rotty
18th June 2010, 22:26
Now who remembers the days when we were told that VR (Virtual Reality) would be the big thing?
Well perhaps in a way they were right.
3D is now a reality for anybody that wants it.
BUT the problem with 3D TV is that the image has of course to be within the rectangle of the TV screen.
The 3D image can be perceived in front or behind the plane of the screen, but still confined to the boundaries of the rectangle, (even on a large TV this is restricting)
SO, perhaps, the best way to enjoy 3D TV/BD is via an improved version of the "Visors" designed for VR.
After all, we have to wear shutter glasses anyway so why not go the whole hog and wear the Visor, the left and right images would be presented simultaneously without switching (no flicker), another advantage.
The visual field would be completely filled and would give complete immersion of the 3D display.
I would be interested to hear what do you think?
I can think of one fly in the ointment with this but dont want to cloud any replies.
Well perhaps in a way they were right.
3D is now a reality for anybody that wants it.
BUT the problem with 3D TV is that the image has of course to be within the rectangle of the TV screen.
The 3D image can be perceived in front or behind the plane of the screen, but still confined to the boundaries of the rectangle, (even on a large TV this is restricting)
SO, perhaps, the best way to enjoy 3D TV/BD is via an improved version of the "Visors" designed for VR.
After all, we have to wear shutter glasses anyway so why not go the whole hog and wear the Visor, the left and right images would be presented simultaneously without switching (no flicker), another advantage.
The visual field would be completely filled and would give complete immersion of the 3D display.
I would be interested to hear what do you think?
I can think of one fly in the ointment with this but dont want to cloud any replies.