View Full Version : AudioPlayer: DirectShow based audio player
(*|*)
8th June 2010, 10:39
AudioPlayer:
http://audioplayer.sourceforge.net/
Screen Shot:
http://audioplayer.sourceforge.net/AP_eng_XP.png
Download:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/audioplayer/AudioPlayer_0.985_NTXP.zip
Source Code:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/audioplayer/AudioPlayer_0.985_src.zip?download
namaiki
8th June 2010, 12:14
Mpc-hc?
(*|*)
8th June 2010, 14:11
no, only audio.
namaiki
8th June 2010, 14:12
For what purpose, or what would distinguish it from MPC-HC?
If all fails, you can use MPC-HC and set video renderer as null. :P
Keiyakusha
8th June 2010, 15:17
What is the point in using directshow interface when normal audio players able to work with all more or less popular formats/containers natively or with plugin?
Anyway, afaik there was DS input component for fb2k from haali. But not sure if it compatible with recent versions. It was made to support mkv but now player has native mkv support so component is outdated.
Mark_A_W
9th June 2010, 00:44
I also want a directshow based audio player which is capable of gapless/seamless playback of separate AUDIO tracks (other than WMP).
This is so I can use Reclock and Convolver Filter/Wrapper (Digital Room Correction).
Whether it plays video or not is kinda irrelevant.
And no, neither MPC-HC or Zoom Player will do what I want.
Foobar will play seamlessly, but it won't load the DS filters I want (AFAIK).
So no, the "normal" audio players do not work, for me, at least.
Keiyakusha
9th June 2010, 00:59
Foobar will play seamlessly, but it won't load the DS filters I want (AFAIK).
What do you mean? It will or will not load filters, and what filters used should be controlled by merits like everywhere else (and by new restrictions in win7 :P)
Mark_A_W
9th June 2010, 01:15
Foobar is not a directshow player.
Until you mentioned a "DS input component" above, I thought it was completely impossible.
Can you explain how the "DS input component" works?
Astrophizz
9th June 2010, 01:33
There is a convolver plugin for foobar2k. I'm not sure why you would want/need reclock for audio only?
Mark_A_W
9th June 2010, 02:05
The convolver plugin in foobar (which I'm using now), is very limited.
It only works for 2 channels, and 1 sample rate (the sample rate used to generate the convolved file).
I cannot play 6 channel 24 bit, 96khz audio for instance.
It works, as far as it goes, but it's very, very limited.
The Directshow Filter "Convolver", is far, far more flexible. It allows you to use a look up table, to match the number of channels and sample rate to a list of per channel impulse files. I can play 2 channel 44.1, 6 channel 96, or when watching video 7 channel 48, or 5 channel 96 - or any combination thereof.
Reclock is only necessary when using a directshow player, to get Wasapi playback. Foobar has Wasapi or Asio inbuilt, I guess that's ok. But I'm not comfortable with foobar in general, as I don't know what it does "under the hood" - if I play back a 24 bit FLAC file, does it stay 24bit all the way?
Using madFLAC and Reclock, I KNOW it is 24 bit all the way.
(*|*)
9th June 2010, 03:52
just like foobar, but directshow based.
focus on audio features only.
supports directx effects & vst plug-ins.
name: AudioPlayer-> Audio Player HD: AP-HD
here is a directshow audio player:
AudioPlayer 0.985
Release Date: 4th January 2007
Release Status: Beta Release
http://audioplayer.sourceforge.net/
AudioPlayer Source Code:
File Size: 159.5KB / 0.17MB
0.985 Source Code
Midzuki
9th June 2010, 05:21
here is a directshow audio player:
AudioPlayer 0.985
Release Date: 4th January 2007
Release Status: Beta Release
http://audioplayer.sourceforge.net/
AudioPlayer Source Code:
File Size: 159.5KB / 0.17MB
0.985 Source Code
I wasn't aware of that. :o
:thanks: for the information.
Mark_A_W
9th June 2010, 05:27
just like foobar, but directshow based.
focus on audio features only.
supports directx effects & vst plug-ins.
name: AudioPlayer-> Audio Player HD: AP-HD
Media Player Classic Home Cinema -> Media Player Modern HD: MPM-HD.
here is a directshow audio player:
AudioPlayer 0.985
Release Date: 4th January 2007
Release Status: Beta Release
http://audioplayer.sourceforge.net/
AudioPlayer Source Code:
File Size: 159.5KB / 0.17MB
0.985 Source Code
Gapless/Seamless playback?
(*|*)
9th June 2010, 05:31
I wasn't aware of that. :o
:thanks: for the information.
you're welcome
Gapless/Seamless playback?
what do you mean?
(*|*)
9th June 2010, 06:32
Only 1 standard (DirectShow), instead of multiple standards like Winamp, foobar2000 & other proprietary standards.
You can change anything you want, unlike other media players
All popular audio formats are available in DirectShow.
Using DirectShow filters as Winamp plug-in. (Like MPC-HC external filters.)
(*|*)
9th June 2010, 07:44
anyone interested?
Mark_A_W
10th June 2010, 01:50
you're welcome
what do you mean?
I mean, that if I have an album ripped to individual lossless flac or wma tracks, that it will play them continuously through without pause.
Windows Media Player and Foobar will do this.
Zoom Player and MPC will not.
(*|*)
10th June 2010, 03:42
I mean, that if I have an album ripped to individual lossless flac or wma tracks, that it will play them continuously through without pause.
Windows Media Player and Foobar will do this.
Zoom Player and MPC will not.
i don't know
Astrophizz
10th June 2010, 08:53
A solution to that would be to rip the whole album as a single flac with a cue file. Well assuming the player can handle a cue file.
(*|*)
10th June 2010, 09:33
the ages of winamp & foobar is over.
video player modern hd only for video.
audio player modern hd only for audio.
only directshow multimedia framework.
no proprietary stuff.
from info@all4mp3.com:
Hi, It’s coming soon ;-). (mp3-hd directshow filter)
Mark_A_W
10th June 2010, 10:41
A solution to that would be to rip the whole album as a single flac with a cue file. Well assuming the player can handle a cue file.
Yes.
But it's too late now....
(*|*)
10th June 2010, 19:59
any programmer interested?
clsid
10th June 2010, 20:24
any programmer interested?
No. You asking for a square wheel when there are already perfectly good round ones available.
(*|*)
10th June 2010, 21:01
No. You asking for a square wheel when there are already perfectly good round ones available.
like what?
clsid
10th June 2010, 21:11
Several have already been mentioned in this topic.
You should realize that nobody gives a shit about the fact that you don't like them, certainly not when you come up with crappy arguments for doing things differently. A programmer is not suddenly going to invest a couple hundred hours of work without pay just to satisfy some random n00b here on the forum.
Mark_A_W
11th June 2010, 00:50
Yeah, I can't figure out if this thread is a request or spam for vapourware.
leeperry
11th June 2010, 07:51
anyone interested?
allow gapless, VST plugins(in 64bit float),volume attenuation(in 64bit float too), Reclock support....and we'll bite http://forum.slysoft.com/images/smilies/agreed.gif
setarip_old
11th June 2010, 22:21
@(*|*)
Exactly what, if any, is your involvement in this apparently stagnant project?
(*|*)
12th June 2010, 08:15
@(*|*)
Exactly what, if any, is your involvement in this apparently stagnant project?
Simple powerful audio player. 1 universal standard (DirectShow) for playback, DirectX plug-in support (Audio processing).
ranpha
12th June 2010, 10:17
Simple powerful audio player. 1 universal standard (DirectShow) for playback, DirectX plug-in support (Audio processing).
If you want a DirectShow media player, buy JetAudio (piss-poor performance with large media database) or use MediaPortal.
(*|*)
12th June 2010, 11:12
If you want a DirectShow media player, buy JetAudio (piss-poor performance with large media database) or use MediaPortal.
no, thanks.
i want a clean-light-audio-player only like foobar, but directshow player, not a proprietary audio player.
ranpha
12th June 2010, 11:59
no, thanks.
i want a clean-light-audio-player only like foobar, but directshow player, not a proprietary audio player.
Then you never use JetAudio then. Just like foobar2k (its Media Center capabilities) but can use DirectShow filters.
(*|*)
12th June 2010, 12:06
jetaudio is bloatware.
namaiki
12th June 2010, 12:17
0/10
.
ranpha
12th June 2010, 12:18
jetaudio is bloatware.
Spoken by someone who never use Jetaudio.
Its only drawback is that the software is payware, else it is just like foobar2k.
Or do you think foobar2k is bloatware too?
(*|*)
12th June 2010, 12:22
Spoken by someone who never use Jetaudio.
Its only drawback is that the software is payware, else it is just like foobar2k.
Or do you think foobar2k is bloatware too?
foobar is liteware.
ranpha
12th June 2010, 12:25
foobar is liteware.
Then JetAudio is also the same. It is very obvious you never use JetAudio.
(*|*)
12th June 2010, 12:48
Then JetAudio is also the same. It is very obvious you never use JetAudio.
there are 2 version:
basic version sucks.
plus vx is bloatware: Video encoding, MP3/mp3PRO encoding Pack, Special Sound Effect (BBE) Pack, Sound Pack, Enhanced Recording Pack, Application Pack.
jetAudio 8.0.6 Basic 32 MB Free
jetAudio 8.0.6 Plus VX 32 MB $29
the ages of proprietary standards is over.
ranpha
12th June 2010, 14:59
there are 2 version:
basic version sucks.
plus vx is bloatware: Video encoding, MP3/mp3PRO encoding Pack, Special Sound Effect (BBE) Pack, Sound Pack, Enhanced Recording Pack, Application Pack.
jetAudio 8.0.6 Basic 32 MB Free
jetAudio 8.0.6 Plus VX 32 MB $29
the ages of proprietary standards is over.
Did you know that you can disable all those features?
And since when DirectShow has become proprietary standard anyway? Did I already said that Jetaudio is a DirectShow player?
And the basic version is still vastly better than AudioPlayer any day.
Ah BTW, please do not forgot that JetAudio, basic or not, is still a DirectShow player no matter how you look at it.
setarip_old
12th June 2010, 18:22
@(*|*)
Again, exactly what, if any, is your involvement in this apparently stagnant project?
Are you the author/developer?
Are you the publisher?
Do you own the website?
Have you been asked by the developer to solicit help to further develop this product?
Etc...
(*|*)
12th June 2010, 20:34
Did you know that you can disable all those features?
And since when DirectShow has become proprietary standard anyway? Did I already said that Jetaudio is a DirectShow player?
And the basic version is still vastly better than AudioPlayer any day.
Ah BTW, please do not forgot that JetAudio, basic or not, is still a DirectShow player no matter how you look at it.
i'll try jetaudio.
leeperry
12th June 2010, 20:40
Does JetAudio support gapless and VST plugins? I'll drop them an email :)
PS: they do crossfade hah: http://www.jetaudio.com/products/jetaudio/features_12.html
(*|*)
13th June 2010, 12:12
tested jetaudio.
jetaudio is %100 bloatware, just like winamp.
iron2000
13th June 2010, 15:34
tested jetaudio.
jetaudio is %100 bloatware, just like winamp.
I don't think Winamp is bloatware.
Its a very customizable and modular piece of software.
You can actually make it pretty minimal.
I would say Windows Live Messenger is bloatware but thats not an audio player.
Atak_Snajpera
13th June 2010, 15:53
the ages of winamp & foobar is over.
Stop trolling ok?
ranpha
13th June 2010, 17:40
tested jetaudio.
jetaudio is %100 bloatware, just like winamp.
Jetaudio, or Winamp for the matter, is not bloatware. WMP or iTunes, now that's bloatware.
Midzuki
13th June 2010, 18:12
I don't think Winamp is bloatware.
Its a very customizable and modular piece of software.
My FOOBAR2K folder contains 11,520,390 bytes.
During my pre-XP-SP3 days, my Winamp 5.35 directory contained over 35MB (default install).
You can actually make it pretty minimal.
Talking about Winamp 2.x ?
Midzuki
13th June 2010, 18:21
<!-- trolling snipped -->
Hi, It’s coming soon ;-). (mp3-hd directshow filter)
"Marketing is the art of lying". :devil: 2 channels @ 16-bit @ 48kHz maximum is not "HD" in my books. :)
Atak_Snajpera
13th June 2010, 18:36
During my pre-XP-SP3 days, my Winamp 5.35 directory contained over 35MB (default install).
This says guy who has probably 500 GB hard-drive ;)
Midzuki
13th June 2010, 18:58
This says guy who has probably 500 GB hard-drive ;)
Only 120GB, actually
(I'm still too old for accepting the SATA standard).
Anyway, tons of RAM and tons of HDD space are not
(and will never be) an acceptable excuse for inefficient coding.
In the 70s, if a programmer decided to tell his colleagues his
"prophetic dream" about a thing called "dot net artwork",
I bet he would be duly "eliminated" in less than 24 hours. :)
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.