benwaggoner
8th March 2010, 20:51
Running through some tests of different profiles targeting different devices, I realized I was assuming an answer to an unasked question:
To what degree can we expect the same CRF setting to provide the same visual experience with the same source, but with different profiles, or with other parameters different? I assume they wouldn't be identical (8x8 blocks aren't going to be pixel identical to 4x4), but how close is a reasoanble expectation?
Setting aside places where max bitrate/VBV would constrain things, should Baseline CRF 23 and High CRF 23 look pretty much the same, and thus the ratio of files sizes be said to be its compression efficiency advantage in that comparison?
When a VBV constraint kicks in, and if the same VBV is used for Baseline and High, we'd certainly expect a smaller file size gap, but the High encode to look better in places where Baseline is constrained by VBV.
To what degree can we expect the same CRF setting to provide the same visual experience with the same source, but with different profiles, or with other parameters different? I assume they wouldn't be identical (8x8 blocks aren't going to be pixel identical to 4x4), but how close is a reasoanble expectation?
Setting aside places where max bitrate/VBV would constrain things, should Baseline CRF 23 and High CRF 23 look pretty much the same, and thus the ratio of files sizes be said to be its compression efficiency advantage in that comparison?
When a VBV constraint kicks in, and if the same VBV is used for Baseline and High, we'd certainly expect a smaller file size gap, but the High encode to look better in places where Baseline is constrained by VBV.