straubgx
8th September 2009, 21:00
Hello, I have a Camcorder Sanyo Xacti 2000 and created a short test clip in 1080p60 @24Mbit AVC/H264.
If I play it back it with either:
1) VLC-Player
2) Mplayer
3) ffdshow with a DirectShow Player (Mediaplayer (classic), Zoomplayer) or
4) use the x264 VfW interface with Virtualdub
the video looks like this (cut out detail of HD video frame):
http://www.esatori.de/pics/decoded with VLC-SMPlayer-ffshow-x264.png
If I use the CoreAVC DirectShow Filter with a DirectShow Player (Mediaplayer (classic), Zoomplayer) the video looks like this (cut out detail of HD video frame):
http://www.esatori.de/pics/decoded with CoreAVC.png
While the overall video decoding also looks good with the opensource decoders, only with CoreAVC I am able to see the whole level of detail (phone display)!
Since I am editing Video with Virtualdub (or Avidemux) these program import it with the lower quality of Picture 1, since they use the opensource implementations for decoding.
Anyone knows why CoreAVC does so much better here ??
I would really like to get the video into the programs in the best possible quality and CoreAVC has no VfW interface.
Thanks a lot for any advice!
Gerry
If I play it back it with either:
1) VLC-Player
2) Mplayer
3) ffdshow with a DirectShow Player (Mediaplayer (classic), Zoomplayer) or
4) use the x264 VfW interface with Virtualdub
the video looks like this (cut out detail of HD video frame):
http://www.esatori.de/pics/decoded with VLC-SMPlayer-ffshow-x264.png
If I use the CoreAVC DirectShow Filter with a DirectShow Player (Mediaplayer (classic), Zoomplayer) the video looks like this (cut out detail of HD video frame):
http://www.esatori.de/pics/decoded with CoreAVC.png
While the overall video decoding also looks good with the opensource decoders, only with CoreAVC I am able to see the whole level of detail (phone display)!
Since I am editing Video with Virtualdub (or Avidemux) these program import it with the lower quality of Picture 1, since they use the opensource implementations for decoding.
Anyone knows why CoreAVC does so much better here ??
I would really like to get the video into the programs in the best possible quality and CoreAVC has no VfW interface.
Thanks a lot for any advice!
Gerry