View Full Version : Too much megabyte wasted...
PiPPoNe92
4th September 2009, 17:31
Hello people!
Here my problem:
When I use avc2avi for convert *.264 to a x264 the file increase of 3 mb size.
Then, when i use virtualdub for mux audio AAC with video .avi (fourcc x264) the file increase of 1 mb size.
At end, when i cut video (credits are deleted) the file increase of 2 mb size.
So, there are 6 mb wasted. How i can resolve this problem??
P.S. I done this because mp4player and mobile phone don't read my mp4 files. I add also that i mux AAC file and .264 with mp4box.
So, I have a file .mp4 with codec video of avc1 and codec audio aac.
Many thanks.
Atak_Snajpera
4th September 2009, 17:36
You better use mkv instead of avi!
PiPPoNe92
4th September 2009, 17:44
are you sure that any mp4player can open it??
detmek
4th September 2009, 18:13
AVI container has large overhead,
You can try XMedia Recode as it has many presets for mobile phones and other devices.
Adub
4th September 2009, 18:22
are you sure that any mp4player can open it??
Okay, fine. Then use the MP4 container. Problem solved.
PiPPoNe92
4th September 2009, 18:29
if i write .*.mp4 output file in the command line of x264, vlc don't can open it..
P.s. I ma trying XMedia Recode
nm
4th September 2009, 18:32
And if you use MP4Box to mux .264 elementary stream and AAC audio, what's wrong then?
nakTT
4th September 2009, 18:36
AVI container has large overhead,
You can try XMedia Recode as it has many presets for mobile phones and other devices.
How about MKV vs mp4, any idea which one have the lower overhead?
:thanks:
PiPPoNe92
4th September 2009, 19:30
with XMedia Recode i have a video of avc1 video codec and aac audio codec, is identical...
I have another question..
but..is avc1 of mp4box, identical to avc1 of mkv (in command line outputfile is *.mkv)?
Atak_Snajpera
4th September 2009, 19:37
P.S. how I mux audio to video .mkv??
Download MKVToolnix and use mmg.exe
PiPPoNe92
4th September 2009, 19:47
yes already found
MrCommunistGen
4th September 2009, 21:22
How about MKV vs mp4, any idea which one have the lower overhead?
:thanks:
Pretty sure that mkv has a lower overhead than mp4, but both are low and the difference should be very small (a few kB per file or so). I'm on my work machine and don't have access to files to test this at the moment.
-mcg
Forteen88
4th September 2009, 21:30
How about MKV vs mp4, any idea which one have the lower overhead? :thanks:
http://www.alexander-noe.com/video/amg/en_overhead_comparison.html
multimediaman
4th September 2009, 22:01
Muxer alone is probably the most important factor.
Just compare lavf vs libeml, libmatroska (mkvmerge) vs gpac filesizes by remuxing.
Lavf's overhead is usually "much" bigger (includes mkv and mp4).
nakTT
4th September 2009, 22:36
http://www.alexander-noe.com/video/amg/en_overhead_comparison.html
Thanks mate.
:thanks:
halsboss
5th September 2009, 04:20
When I use avc2avi for convert *.264 to a x264 the file increase of 3 mb size.
Then, when i use virtualdub for mux audio AAC with video .avi (fourcc x264) the file increase of 1 mb size.
At end, when i cut video (credits are deleted) the file increase of 2 mb size.
So, there are 6 mb wasted. How i can resolve this problem??
Er, are you still in the 70's ??? 6 Mb ??? I bought a 4 Gigabyte SD card for my phone the other day and it was cheap. I think you're wasting your time.
nakTT
5th September 2009, 06:12
http://www.alexander-noe.com/video/amg/en_overhead_comparison.html
I get overhead of 2.3MB with mp4 container for 1:26:22 movie length. Will try with mkv container.
Er, are you still in the 70's ??? 6 Mb ??? I bought a 4 Gigabyte SD card for my phone the other day and it was cheap. I think you're wasting your time.
I guess everyone value 6MB differently depending on their usage. So I think you should cool down a bit mate.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.