DTS-HD software decoder

[Doug Snake]

I made demux bluray and received dts-hd but at playing goes jerky! Than it is possible to open it? What is it software decoder?

[Blue_MiSfit]

Well... this thread is definitely in the wrong place, but I'll respond anyway :)

So, you demuxed a BluRay, correct? What did you use to do this? What was your exact procedure?

My suggestion would be to use eac3to to rip and demux the BluRay. I would transcode DTS-HD to FLAC, personally.

~MiSfit

[Doug Snake]

I demux all streams in tsMuxer.

Transcode DTS-HD to FLAC deterioration quality means! It's variant but whether decoders is not present?

[LoRd_MuldeR]

You know that FLAC is a lossless compressor ???

[Blue_MiSfit]

In order to transcode DTS-HD you need a capable decoder (like Arcsoft's). This is rather expensive, and may not be worth it for the placebo effect of having "HD Audio".

Personally, I would extract the DTS core, and keep that as-is, or re-encode to AAC. This can all be done for free with eac3to.

I'm not sure where your stuttering comes from. Can your PC play video-only successfully?

~MiSfit

[Doug Snake]

Blue_MiSfit
Very much it would be desirable to leave original quality without coding. Capacities of the personal computer under video HD suffice with interest really will not suffice under audio DTS-HD?

LoRd_MuldeR
You know that FLAC is a lossless compressor ???
Yes, I know. But not so excellent what original (DTS-HD)!

[Atak_Snajpera]

Yes, I know. But not so excellent what original (DTS-HD)!
OMG!!! What are you talking about? FLAC HAS even better compression than DTSMA!

[Fr4nz]

LoRd_MuldeR
You know that FLAC is a lossless compressor ???
Yes, I know. But not so excellent what original (DTS-HD)!

Do you know what means "lossless" ??

[LoRd_MuldeR]

LoRd_MuldeR
You know that FLAC is a lossless compressor ???
Yes, I know. But not so excellent what original (DTS-HD)!

The definition of "lossless" is that the decoded stream is identical to the one the was encoded, so what you say makes no sense :rolleyes:

Whether you decode the original DTS-HD stream at playback time -or- decode it to lossless FLAC first and then listen to that FLAC file later makes absolutely no difference ;)

The bits that will be sent to the DAC of your sound card will be identical in both cases...

[Blue_MiSfit]

Everyone is quite correct here, Doug Snake.

FLAC is 100% mathematically lossless to whatever you feed it. Keeping that in mind, it does compress better than DTS-HD MA, and is therefore a better choice for pc playback.

If you're going to make a BluRay disc or want to bitstream this out to a receiver, you should keep the DTS-HD as-is.

~MiSfit

[Biggiesized]

This guy is definitely running his text through some English translator tool.

[Doug Snake]

Blue_MiSfit
FLAC is 100% mathematically lossless to whatever you feed it. Keeping that in mind, it does compress better than DTS-HD MA, and is therefore a better choice for pc playback.

If you're going to make a BluRay disc or want to bitstream this out to a receiver, you should keep the DTS-HD as-is.
I have understood. Thanks

LoRd_MuldeR
The definition of "lossless" is that the decoded stream is identical to the one the was encoded, so what you say makes no sense

Whether you decode the original DTS-HD stream at playback time -or- decode it to lossless FLAC first and then listen to that FLAC file later makes absolutely no difference

The bits that will be sent to the DAC of your sound card will be identical in both cases...
I have understood. Thx


Any transformation of a sound this already loss! I have in view of carrying over of a sound from one format in another! At studio Sound even recordings at a sound stage are losses! Excepting a digital sound.

I Having read information, I hoped for last 2 years that that there were standard decoders. But it is visible ...
There was nothing also all as it is necessary to transform in flac

[Doug Snake]

Atak_Snajpera
OMG!!! What are you talking about? FLAC HAS even better compression than DTSMA!
What, OMG??!)) Yes, I like Flac from CDDA cd's. But I had a question how to keep an original sound!! ;)

[Chengbin]

Any transformation of a sound this already loss! I have in view of carrying over of a sound from one format in another! At studio Sound even recordings at a sound stage are losses! Excepting a digital sound.

I Having read information, I hoped for last 2 years that that there were standard decoders. But it is visible ...
There was nothing also all as it is necessary to transform in flac

That is NOT true.

FLAC is lossless. So if you convert a sound to FLAC, it is IDENTICAL to the original. Absolutely no change.

What you are thinking is digital to analog.

BTW, I'm surprised this thread hasn't been moved.

[Doug Snake]

What you are thinking is digital to analog.


No. Analog it's analog, digital it's digital.

[robbynaish]

Personally, I would extract the DTS core,

~MiSfit

Hi

With "extract the core" you mean divide video from audio?

Which way is faster and better to extract the core?
Thanks

Ale

[tebasuna51]

With "extract the core" you mean divide video from audio?
No, DTS-HD (MA or HR) have a internal part (core) DTS standard playable with standard DTS decoders and compatible with SPDIF (optical/coaxial digital audio) conexion (you don't need HDMI and DTS-HD decoders).
Which way is faster and better to extract the core?
Like was say in the thread you can use eac3to.