Log in

View Full Version : keeping vc1 in the same format


rockingstud
10th May 2009, 03:32
Hello People...


I was trying to encode a movie to fit a 23bg disc. I've gotten the movie to fit the disc but the only problem the video isn't sync with the audio. The original format is vc-1. But when it encoded it used the mpeg4 avc format. Is there a way to keep the original video setting, because the setting before it encoded the audio and video worked fine. Can someone please help me? Maybe I'm doing something wrong... thanks..

Capsbackup
10th May 2009, 05:16
For a full movie backup, you have a challenge ahead. For a movie only, there may be a work around. It has been discussed in another thread in this forum. So rather than repeating, check out the other posts -BD-RB with VC1 1080i.

Furiousflea
10th May 2009, 05:16
Hello People...


I was trying to encode a movie to fit a 23bg disc. I've gotten the movie to fit the disc but the only problem the video isn't sync with the audio. The original format is vc-1. But when it encoded it used the mpeg4 avc format. Is there a way to keep the original video setting, because the setting before it encoded the audio and video worked fine. Can someone please help me? Maybe I'm doing something wrong... thanks..

no h264 (mpeg4 AVC) is a far more efficient codec than VC1 which is why it is used by BD-Rebuilder. It supports everything that is needed. If your output has a problem it could be anything but it's got nothing to do with the choice of codec being used to encode.

Adub
10th May 2009, 08:20
This is not entirely true. H.264 is not "far more efficient" than VC1. Currently, I will believe that x264 (not to be confused with H.264, the standard) provides better quality at a specified file size, due to it's AQ and Psy-optimization features.

The reason that BD Rebuilder uses x264 is because it is an open encoder, with numerous tools and utilities available for it's use. VC-1 has one, maybe two tools available for content creation. In addition, x264 is just plain faster than VC-1 when it comes to encoding. This is due largely in part to the numerous hand-coded assembly and C optimizations done by the developers.

In short, the reason BD Rebuilder uses x264 is because it offers more encoding options, is faster, and produces a "more efficient" encode.

NOTE: I didn't say "far more efficient".

Furiousflea
10th May 2009, 19:49
This is not entirely true. H.264 is not "far more efficient" than VC1. Currently, I will believe that x264 (not to be confused with H.264, the standard) provides better quality at a specified file size, due to it's AQ and Psy-optimization features.

The reason that BD Rebuilder uses x264 is because it is an open encoder, with numerous tools and utilities available for it's use. VC-1 has one, maybe two tools available for content creation. In addition, x264 is just plain faster than VC-1 when it comes to encoding. This is due largely in part to the numerous hand-coded assembly and C optimizations done by the developers.

In short, the reason BD Rebuilder uses x264 is because it offers more encoding options, is faster, and produces a "more efficient" encode.

NOTE: I didn't say "far more efficient".


Far more efficient in laymans terms, which the op obviously is. :D

rockingstud
10th May 2009, 22:36
I still dont know wahat to do, can someone explain to me .. Thanks

Furiousflea
10th May 2009, 23:46
I still dont know wahat to do, can someone explain to me .. Thanks

Do....Do what?

Disc? Codecs installed? BDRB version? OS? Pre Processed? Original source exhibit this problem? Anything else we should know?

Come on...geewizz!

Capsbackup
13th May 2009, 15:41
I still dont know wahat to do, can someone explain to me .. Thanks

If your original file is 29.970fps, you can try to open the associated .mpls or the .m2ts file for the movie you want in tsmuxer (The .mpls will have the chapter info if you want that). Use BDInfo to find out which one if you don't know. Once you have that open, click (select) the .m2ts file in the window below the top, and see if you have the option to "change frame rate" and "remove pulldown". If so, select them and make sure you change the frame rate to 24000/1001. Then you can proceed to select ( or deselect) any and all audio tracks and subtitle tracks that you want to keep. Then you can create the new .ts, .m2ts or blueray that you want.
Note: I have only tried this one time and on one movie, and it worked perfectly. But it is only going to work for a movie only, not a full backup of the entire disk. :)

rockingstud
15th May 2009, 04:13
sorry for the delay.. I ran bdinfo. I have vc-1 video 1080p/23/976 fps/ adavanced profile 3. Does that require any special settings to burn to bd25 and play on my ps3? thanks

setarip_old
15th May 2009, 04:48
@rockingstud

Hi!

Am I correct in believing that your original disc is an HD-DVD that you've converted to BluRay format?

If so, what's the title?

rockingstud
15th May 2009, 17:34
Well the movie is a blu- ray movie.. Iam trying to rip the blu- ray to a bd25 ..



Thanks

setarip_old
15th May 2009, 19:54
On the chance that I, or another member, also own(s) the same original BluRay disc, please be good enough to tell us the title of your BluRay disc...

Furiousflea
15th May 2009, 20:15
Do....Do what?

Disc? Codecs installed? BDRB version? OS? Pre Processed? Original source exhibit this problem? Anything else we should know?

Come on...geewizz!

...How infuriating. :stupid:

GaPony
16th May 2009, 00:18
Since you're pointing to your own quote..... wouldn't that make you stupid? :eek: :D :p j/k