View Full Version : 2-pass and decomb filter
redlenses
2nd April 2009, 20:00
I'm encoding TV Show DVDs to H.264 for playback on a PS3
When I used the defaults in Handbrake or RipBot, I'm getting noticeable combing.
My question is: What are the negatives of using the decomb filter and/or 2 pass encoding? Why wouldn't one want these options on all the time? The default Handbrake PS3 profile does not include them.
LoRd_MuldeR
2nd April 2009, 21:31
I guess with "Decomb" you either mean Deinterlacing or Inverse-Telecine (IVTC). Anyway: That is not related to the encoding mode! Given that your source is interlaced/telecined and you don't want to encode it as interlaced, you must deinterlace/IVTC the video before encoding. So that is pre-processing. Encoding modes are a completely different thing! If you want the best quality for a given target filesize (or target bitrate), then you should use 2-Pass mode. If you want to retain a certain level of quality (and don't care about the filesize), then you should use CRF mode. But none of these encoding modes works better/worse with interlaced/telecined material. You must apply the proper pre-processing and choose the suitable encoding mode...
redlenses
2nd April 2009, 21:45
Handbrake says that it's "decomb" setting does the following: When a frame shows a significant amount of combing, decomb runs a tweaked version of HandBrake's "Slower" deinterlacing filter. That's yadif, a spatially (within one frame) and temporally (between several frames) aware deinterlacer. The tweak is that it uses a looks at more pixels when generating the spatial predictions.
When a frame is only very slightly combed, decomb runs a blending deinterlacer called a lowpass-5 filter. This preserves more detail from the image than yadif, and in particular prevents noticeable deinterlacing artifacts on progressive video.
OK so to refine my question: Why wouldn't someone run things through a decombing pre-process step before encoding? Handbrake doesn't have this selected by default for the PS3 profile.
Guest
2nd April 2009, 22:17
The handbrake guys ripped off my name "Decomb" from me. My next filter will be called "Handbrake".
LoRd_MuldeR
2nd April 2009, 22:44
OK so to refine my question: Why wouldn't someone run things through a decombing pre-process step before encoding?
Because somebody has an interlaced/telecined source and wants to encode it as progressive ???
Handbrake doesn't have this selected by default for the PS3 profile.
So what? Whether deinterlacing/IVTC is required or not depends on the type of source, NOT on the target playback device...
The handbrake guys ripped off my name "Decomb" from me. My next filter will be called "Handbrake".
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. :)
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.