Log in

View Full Version : rip quality or...


remiche
27th November 2008, 16:13
If you rip 1 dvd9 with 2GHz for 4 hours
and rip same dvd9 for 2 hours with dual core 2GHz...

who is the best, first rip or second...
or both rips is same quality...

sorry for my bad english.

Guest
27th November 2008, 16:17
If by "rip" you mean decrypt and copy files to your hard disk, then the quality is the same.

CWR03
27th November 2008, 17:26
Or if by "rip" you mean convert from DVD9 to AVI, and you use the exact same procedures and softwares on two different machines, also the quality will be the same. The only difference is the length of time the process takes.

remiche
27th November 2008, 19:47
neuron2:
"rip" DVDRip from DVD to .avi DivX or XviD...

...but DivX is better than XviD?

den78
27th November 2008, 20:02
better
u shouldn't use that word m8 :D
anyway, xvid is prefered, just browse the forum & u'll c 4 yourself.

remiche
27th November 2008, 21:22
den78:
xvid is prefered, but "the scene" want xvid...

i think DivX is better... but not sure...

"the scene" say all music rips to be .mp3 (is prefered)
but flac is... :))

den78
27th November 2008, 22:02
well, in that case u obviously need 2 use x264 ;)

CWR03
28th November 2008, 00:17
xvid is prefered, but "the scene" want xvid...
I'm pretty sure asking for help with copyrighted material that you intend to share falls under forum rule 6.