View Full Version : using hqv test disk: purevideo dxva vs ffdshow seesaw
Jeremy Duncan
22nd August 2008, 00:03
no postprocessing
http://thumbnails.imagebam.com/1168/cf6e1111671896.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/cf6e1111671896)
lanczos resize
http://thumbnails.imagebam.com/1168/c38c4d11671899.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/c38c4d11671899)
lanczos resize luma .20
http://thumbnails.imagebam.com/1168/d9d76a11671901.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/d9d76a11671901)
seesaw
http://thumbnails.imagebam.com/1168/693df811671905.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/693df811671905)
purevideo dxva on ati 2600xt pcie
http://thumbnails.imagebam.com/1168/a0861111671907.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/a0861111671907)
no postprocessing
http://thumbnails.imagebam.com/1168/2ec8a111671909.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/2ec8a111671909)
lanczos resize
http://thumbnails.imagebam.com/1168/f9160f11671912.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/f9160f11671912)
lanczos resize luma .20
http://thumbnails.imagebam.com/1168/96c62e11671914.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/96c62e11671914)
seesaw
http://thumbnails.imagebam.com/1168/63b47711671917.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/63b47711671917)
purevideo dxva on ati 2600xt pcie
http://thumbnails.imagebam.com/1168/cdf01e11671920.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/cdf01e11671920)
link to folder with pictures
http://files.filefront.com/detailzip/;11567083;/fileinfo.html
i set the purevideo to raw aspect, film, vmr9
i used ffdshow version 2079 clsid, media player classic home cinema version 1.1.604.0, avisynth and plugins found in the sticky.
i used these ffdshow settings:
http://thumbnails.imagebam.com/1168/eeac5d11672854.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/eeac5d11672854)
mpc was set to use vmr9 windowed.
the first picture is noise, the second detail.
Ranguvar
22nd August 2008, 00:58
Is there any way to increase sharpening on PureVideo?
Personally, I think SeeSaw did the best, though I think a light denoise should be run before the sharpen anyways.
Sagekilla
22nd August 2008, 01:26
I believe you can adjust the sharpening parameters for PureVideo through the nivida control panel. I believe it's under right click desktop --> Nvidia Control Panel --> Video & Television --> Adjust Video Image Settings --> Edge Enhancement. There's also the noise reduction there, and the option of enabling Inverse Telecine (this bothers me a bit though, I don't know why they wouldn't autodetect for this)
Jeremy Duncan
22nd August 2008, 03:10
Is there any way to increase sharpening on PureVideo?
Personally, I think SeeSaw did the best, though I think a light denoise should be run before the sharpen anyways.
no postprocessing
http://thumbnails.imagebam.com/1168/2ec8a111671909.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/2ec8a111671909)
lanczos resize
http://thumbnails.imagebam.com/1168/f9160f11671912.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/f9160f11671912)
lanczos resize luma .20
http://thumbnails.imagebam.com/1168/96c62e11671914.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/96c62e11671914)
seesaw
http://thumbnails.imagebam.com/1168/63b47711671917.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/63b47711671917)
purevideo dxva on ati 2600xt pcie
http://thumbnails8.imagebam.com/1169/5e98db11681038.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/5e98db11681038)
purevideo with detail edge enhancement at 40
http://thumbnails8.imagebam.com/1169/b26a6611681039.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/b26a6611681039)
link to folder with pictures
http://files.filefront.com/hqv+detailzip/;11568514;/fileinfo.html
here's the pictures but with purevideo edge enhancement.
same pictures as before, but the purevideo are difference, with it set to smart deinterlace not film as before.
i could not get the edge enhancement to work in any other disk since i use progressive disks and the hqv is interlaced.
i tried everything i could to get the same amout of detail enhancement on a regular movie dvd as was on the hqv test disk,
but regardless of how i set it it did not happen.
i think edge enhancement only happens when the purevideo coded is setup to use smart deinterlacing and the film is interlaced.
Sagekilla
22nd August 2008, 04:05
Wow, that edge enhancement really does look better.
Jeremy Duncan
22nd August 2008, 04:15
yeah. :)
Sagekilla
22nd August 2008, 04:22
Can we have some sample pictures of the edge enhancement + noise reduction on that roller coaster image? I'm curious as to how well it works there.
Ranguvar
22nd August 2008, 04:39
Err... are you guys joking about the edge enhancement? To me, it looks wretched :p Blockish, and artificial.
Sagekilla
22nd August 2008, 04:49
Relatively speaking, the edge enhanced version looks MUCH better than without it. It's no where near as good as Seesaw is doing, but it's certainly an improvement. Also, I don't see the blocking you're describing, but I do find it an improvement over the default purevideo settings.
Ranguvar
22nd August 2008, 05:13
Relatively speaking, the edge enhanced version looks MUCH better than without it. It's no where near as good as Seesaw is doing, but it's certainly an improvement. Also, I don't see the blocking you're describing, but I do find it an improvement over the default purevideo settings.
Oh, okay, over the old PureVideo, maybe. Personal preference; to me, edge enhancement makes it look unnatural. Look closely... everything looks made up of blocks! Perhaps we should call it microblocking :p
Jeremy Duncan
22nd August 2008, 06:07
Can we have some sample pictures of the edge enhancement + noise reduction on that roller coaster image? I'm curious as to how well it works there.
well it's a interlaced picture and my seesaw config doesn't deinterlace, so i dunno what good this comparison is.
purevideo dxva with 40 edge enhancement
http://thumbnails4.imagebam.com/1170/90376c11690479.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/90376c11690479)
seesaw
http://thumbnails4.imagebam.com/1170/693df811690480.gif (http://www.imagebam.com/image/693df811690480)
Sagekilla
22nd August 2008, 06:11
I was more interested in the denoising / EE capabilities of purevideo than deinterlacing ;) Not so great it seems on either front. I'll stick to ffdshow + avisynth.
@Ranguvar: It probably doesn't help that I'm viewing these images on a 15.4" laptop with a 1920x1200 screen. Everything looks much more compact and it's hard to see those artifacts on this laptop! Kind of a blessing sometimes.
Jeremy Duncan
22nd August 2008, 06:16
i turned off the denoising and only used ee. if i use denoising then the picture will blur.
in my experience, ati denoising is either at 64 or nothing, and 64 totally blurs the details out, so i just turned denoisng off so the picture wouldn't llook all blurred out.
Sagekilla
22nd August 2008, 06:20
What surprises me is they still use spatial smearing filters, instead of investing some logic into some temporal based ones. Even with a window of 1, forwards and backwards, like what MVDegrain1 does, you can smush a lot of artifacts and keep 95% of the detail.
Jeremy Duncan
22nd August 2008, 06:29
here's my seesaw script in case anybody wants to know. this was a copy and paste from a thread i started in avsforum.com
that's why i mention sticky in the op.
SetMemoryMax(1024)
MT("
a= last
b=a.Spresso(limit=1, limitC=1, bias=27, biasc=27, rgmode=17, rgmodec=17)
SeeSaw(a, b, NRlimit=0, NRlimit2=5, Sstr=1.60, Szp=1, Slimit=9, Sdamplo=16, Spower=1, sootheT=95, SdampHi=39)
",3)
aWarpSharp(depth=20, blurlevel=2, thresh=0.21, cm=0)
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.