Log in

View Full Version : Increasing the private messages quota


Hard Core Rikki
8th May 2008, 14:28
Possible?
100 sounds a little low a limit, and deleting possibly sensitive messages or ones more desirable to be kept would be cool.

jeffy
8th May 2008, 14:37
Do you know you can
Download all Private Messages as:
XML | CSV | Text

Hard Core Rikki
8th May 2008, 16:38
Yes, I do. Keeping the messages associated with the forum account is neater though. Not everyone really would keep carrying their PM history in usb keys.

I myself have very few PMs, but those who reached the 100 PM quota cannot receive any further ones.

Shinigami-Sama
8th May 2008, 23:02
yeah I've had that happen a few times myself
was lame

you could probably help this cause by mailing a nice big harddrive to swede to put in the server just for that ;)

Dark Shikari
8th May 2008, 23:03
I agree, it'd be damn nice to have a larger quota. I keep having to clear mine out.

Sharktooth
9th May 2008, 02:45
the limited quota is particularly usefull... at least for me...

foxyshadis
9th May 2008, 10:48
Become a moderator, get as many PMs as you want. :p Seriously, I'm of the opinion that PMs should be unlimited (with an option to simply turn them off for people like sharktooth) since they take up no more space than any forum post, but doom9 doesn't see it that way.

Inventive Software
10th May 2008, 22:34
The issue there though, is cost. If you, for example, double the PM allocation, you've potentially doubled your costs, certainly in the case of the 500 or so regular users. Cost is always at the forefront of things. The more space you need, the more it'll cost.

Case in point: my serial downloading of both useful tools and university programs, and other random s**t, has more than doubled my space needs, and that's doubled again because I've got to back that up somewhere. It all costs money (but less because hard drive prices keep coming down), which is something I'm a lil short of, being a student without a job, but good placement prospects for 2008/09. :)

Dark Shikari
10th May 2008, 22:51
The issue there though, is cost. If you, for example, double the PM allocation, you've potentially doubled your costs, certainly in the case of the 500 or so regular users. Cost is always at the forefront of things. The more space you need, the more it'll cost.

Case in point: my serial downloading of both useful tools and university programs, and other random s**t, has more than doubled my space needs, and that's doubled again because I've got to back that up somewhere. It all costs money (but less because hard drive prices keep coming down), which is something I'm a lil short of, being a student without a job, but good placement prospects for 2008/09. :)If there was a cost issue, doom9 would start deleting old posts, or perhaps a few of those gigantic attachments (each of which is probably equal to a few dozen threads in terms of size).

PMs are cheap.

Hard Core Rikki
11th May 2008, 00:08
o.O PMs take virtually no space o.O
Just denying avatars to people with less than 5 posts could save more enough to compensate, lol

If anything, normal members could be separated into 2 usergroups with different quotas (for uploads, PMs, etc...). Not like people under 50 posts should really have a high PM quota...

Shinigami-Sama
11th May 2008, 00:51
o.O PMs take virtually no space o.O
Just denying avatars to people with less than 5 posts could save more enough to compensate, lol

If anything, normal members could be separated into 2 usergroups with different quotas (for uploads, PMs, etc...). Not like people under 50 posts should really have a high PM quota...

a better way would be having a few 'high traffic' people, like the devs of things like imgburn, x264, xvid, the decypters ect...
because they're the ones that would benefit most; except for shark, it'd just mean more deletion for him :P

Swede
13th May 2008, 21:48
Just because I'm in a good mood as the load has dropped quite a bit since the upgrade I've doubled the amount of PMspace. It's not really a question of space as much as time to backup the 1.5GB database. As it is now I only shut it down once a week since it takes some 10 minutes to backup and I don't want that time to increase.