new HD x264 video encoding benchmark

[graysky]

Techarp is hosting a new HD x264 benchmark (http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=520). Have a look and run it on your system to help populate the data table.

Basically, you run the test encode of an HD sample (1280x720) and it will report back frames-per-second values for your machine @ it's clock/overclock level. You can run it at your stock settings and at your overclock settings to see how your machine compares to others in the database.

My goal is to have a representative set of data for many different chips and chipsets. Please just report your results here in this thread. I will keep the data at that url to keep things simple.

Thanks all and enjoy!

The following image will be updated automatically as new data comes in. It doesn't display any results, but it does show the number of data points collected so far and how they break down by CPU type:

http://www.techarp.com/x264_Benchmark/hd//gfx/histo.gif

[Guest]

Please just report your results here in this thread. I will keep the data at that url to keep things simple. I don't get it. It seems simpler to me if we enter our results directly at the site. Why do you want to be a middleman?

[graysky]

@neuron2 - Please feel free to do so if you have an account on techarp (accounts are free). Some people don't like to register at new places when they already have accounts. By asking peeps to post to the doom9 thread, it just makes it easier for them to post results at all.

I'm not the middleman, I'm the only person compiling the data. The good folks at TA have graciously agreed to host the file and the results.

[Guest]

I see. Thank you for your explanation.

[graysky]

@neuron2 - no problem. Thank you for your work with dgindex :)

[graysky]

...3 days and no one has an interest?

[Konrad Klar]

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 32.37 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 32.78 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 32.47 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 32.65 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 8.26 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 8.26 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 8.29 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 8.28 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

E6600, 9x333, P965, DDR2, 5-5-5-15 @ 416 MHz, Windows 2003 Server Enterprise Edition SP2.

[lucassp]

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 18.54 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 19.20 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 19.21 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 19.13 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.46 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.46 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.46 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.46 fps, 3942.92 kb/s


TL-58, 9.5x200, RS690M, 2GB DDR2@667 5-5-5-15 2T, Windows XP Pro

[Dr.Khron]

Eh, ever since I built the new PC, I've been catching up on all the games from the last two years that my PC was too slow to play... Hell, I havn't even OC'ed the new box yet, havn't needed to. :D

I'm in the midst of a QuakeWars addiction right now, when it dries up in a few days, I'll give your new benchmark a go. It'll be a good excuse to do some OCing and tweaking. I should be able to get a significant boost out of my machine with the stock cooler.

[graysky]

thanks for the data, guys. Will update shortly.

[Southstorm]

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 12.84 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 12.88 fps, 3904.07 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 12.89 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 12.89 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 3.30 fps, 3941.77 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 3.31 fps, 3942.27 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 3.30 fps, 3941.77 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 3.30 fps, 3941.77 kb/s


Prescott 550, 17x200, 915G, DDR, 3-3-3-8 @ 200MHz, XP Home SP2

[deekey777]

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.62 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.77 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.83 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.80 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.67 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.67 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.68 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.68 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

A64 X2 3600+ (S939), 10x200, DDR400, WinXP SP2, ASRock 939DUAL-VSTA (ULi 1695)

[graysky]

@deekey777- which 3600+ do you have (codename)?

[deekey777]

@deekey777- which 3600+ do you have (codename)?

It's A64 X2 3600+ wit 2x2,0 GHz and 2x256 kB L2 cache for S939.
Codename? Hm, Everest says, it's a Manchester.

[DD51]

CPU Q6600
MB Asus P5K Deluxe P35
9x373
3357MHZ
5-5-5-12 @447Mhz 5:6
Windows XP SP2 x32

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 68.98 fps, 3904.67 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 68.77 fps, 3904.67 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 69.29 fps, 3904.67 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 69.86 fps, 3904.67 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 18.93 fps, 3952.97 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 18.97 fps, 3952.97 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 18.96 fps, 3952.97 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 18.95 fps, 3952.97 kb/s

[graysky]

It's A64 X2 3600+ wit 2x2,0 GHz and 2x256 kB L2 cache for S939.
Codename? Hm, Everest says, it's a Manchester.

Cool, can you give me the memory timings and final memory speed?

[deekey777]

Cool, can you give me the memory timings and final memory speed?


Dual DDR400, 200 MHz, 2.5-3-3-7 CR1

[graysky]

Thanks man, will update the table shortly.
@DD51 and southstorm - thanks for the data also :)

[breez]

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 32.48 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 32.74 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 32.56 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 32.51 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 8.23 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 8.30 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 8.18 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 8.29 fps, 3942.92 kb/s


E4300, 9x333, P35, 4GB DDR2 @ 800MHz 18-5-5-5, Vista x64

[Manao]

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 58.67 fps, 3904.94 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 58.56 fps, 3904.94 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 58.67 fps, 3904.94 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 58.71 fps, 3904.94 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 28.74 fps, 3974.08 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 28.73 fps, 3974.08 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 28.70 fps, 3974.08 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 28.73 fps, 3974.08 kb/s

2 x Xeon E5420 @ 2.5 Ghz, 4GB DDR2 @ 333 MHz 5-5-5-15, Windows 2003 Server

[Digga]

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 21.10 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 21.40 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 21.31 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 21.47 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.90 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.91 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.90 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.88 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

CPU:
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ (Windsor, Socket AM2) 10x200.9
RAM:
DDR2 2x1024 (dual) 5-5-5-18 @ 200.9
MB:
NVIDIA SPP190 (C51XE)
NVIDIA nForce 570 SLI
OS:
Win XP x64 SP2

[Blue_MiSfit]

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.44 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.38 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.47 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.33 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 5.09 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 5.09 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 5.09 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 5.09 fps, 3942.92 kb/s


Little laptop that could... Core 2 Duo (merom) 1.8 GHz - 200 MHz FSB (800 effective), 2 GB DDR2 @ 667MHz - 5/5/5/15.

Hitachi 120GB SATA HD - I think it's 5400RPM.

XP 32 bit

Not too bad!!

~MiSfit

[graysky]

Thanks for the new data everyone! I will update shortly.

@MiSfit - is that a T5600?

[bond]

i have avisynth installed, still your tool doesnt detect it. i have not installed avisynth in the standard folder

[graysky]

@bond - yeah, the batch file as you can see looks the avisyth in the standard folder:

%PROGRAMFILES%\AviSynth 2.5 (if using a x86 architecture)
%PROGRAMFILES(x86)%\AviSynth 2.5 (if using an x64 architecture)

Since you have it installed to a non-standard location, it'll fail the check. You can simply edit the batch file and delete both the :avisynth_check32, :avisynth_check64, and :error sections. Leave everything under the :start section alone.

The beginning of your batch file should look like this:cls
@echo off
cd test

:start

That should work :)

[bond]

here are my old fat ladies' results:


---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 2.87 fps, 3902.58 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 2.87 fps, 3902.58 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 2.89 fps, 3902.58 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 2.89 fps, 3902.58 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 0.73 fps, 3936.11 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 0.73 fps, 3936.11 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 0.73 fps, 3936.11 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 0.72 fps, 3936.11 kb/s
Pentium 3 EB Coppermine Brand ID 2, 6.5x133, VIA Apollo Pro Chipset, SDRAM, Timings 3-3-3-6, WinXP Pro 2002 SP2

[Blue_MiSfit]

Thanks for the new data everyone! I will update shortly.

@MiSfit - is that a T5600?

T7100 actually :)

2MB cache

[kurt]

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 18.73 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 19.22 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 19.19 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 19.18 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.58 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.61 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.60 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.60 fps, 3942.92 kb/s
Intel core duo T2500 2x2.0 GHz, 12x166, i945PM, DDR2 5x5x5x15 @ 333 MHz, XP Pro SP2

[smok3]

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.32 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.30 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.31 fps, 3905.26 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.28 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG

encoded 1442 frames, 4.78 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG

encoded 1442 frames, 4.78 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG

encoded 1442 frames, 4.79 fps, 3942.79 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG

encoded 1442 frames, 4.78 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

cpu - Opteron 170 (Denmark), 10x201
ram - DDR 2048 MBytes, Dual @ 167.5Mhz 4-4-7-10
chipset - nForce4

[graysky]

Thanks for the data, all. Will update shortly.

@bond - is that SDRAM in your machine and what speed does it run @ (CPU-Z (http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php) can tell you the answer to both questions)

@smok3 - which o/s and 32 or 64 bit?

[smok3]

xp pro sp2 (32bit :P), opteron is 64 (socket 939)

[aicjofs]

Hey long time no see...good to see the benchmark in HD...hehe. Got a new rig to test out here.

Vista x64....I believe the rest is in the screenshot(except it's the Special Edition Maximus Formula). Always a great benchmark...Cheers!!

EDIT: The 2nd result down(Yorkfield) in the master list seems to have a ridiculous 2nd pass, is it correct? which forum did that come from I'd like to see that configuration?

http://home.comcast.net/~aicjofs/Untitled.jpg

http://www.algidpc.com/Retouched/thumbs/07SideFullOpenthumb.JPG

[smok3]

hem, and i thought my lil opteron is kinda cool, :)

[bond]

@bond - is that SDRAM in your machine and what speed does it run @ (CPU-Z (http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php) can tell you the answer to both questions)yes, as i wrote its sdram. what exactly do you mean with speed? (ie which field in cpuz?), i already posted some under "timings": CL till tRAS

[Inventive Software]

Speed I think he refers to is the clock speed the RAM's at. From the FSB you're running, I'd guess 133 MHz?

[Inventive Software]

Results from my trusted laptop! :D


---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 16.23 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 16.25 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 16.26 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 16.27 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 3.70 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 3.69 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 3.69 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 3.69 fps, 3942.92 kb/s


AMD Turion64 X2 Mobile TL-50, 1.6 GHz, 90nm, Chipset: ATI Xpress 200 (RS480), 1GB DDR2 @ 266 MHz, 4-4-4-12, XP MCE 2k5 32bit. Any more info I missed? ;)

[graysky]

@IS - Got it, thanks. I'll update the tables soon.
@bond - sorry I missed it in your post. Yeah, I'm just wondering what speed the memory is running at. If you look in the "Memory" tab of CPU-Z, it should tell you under the "Timings" section in a field called, "DRAM Frequency."

[bond]

@IS - Got it, thanks. I'll update the tables soon.
@bond - sorry I missed it in your post. Yeah, I'm just wondering what speed the memory is running at. If you look in the "Memory" tab of CPU-Z, it should tell you under the "Timings" section in a field called, "DRAM Frequency."dram frequency is greyed out

[graysky]

@bond - ok.. it's very likely the same as your FSB. Thanks!

[jay78]

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 73.59 fps, 3905.42 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 71.82 fps, 3905.42 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 72.27 fps, 3905.42 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 71.60 fps, 3905.42 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.21 fps, 3952.85 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.14 fps, 3952.85 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.17 fps, 3952.85 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.15 fps, 3952.85 kb/s

@aicjofs
same case here too bud and wat kind of rad is that ??
http://maxupload.com/img/61F1E16B.png

[graysky]

@jay - can you give me the system specs?

[Japhsoncross]

Phenom 9750 12x200 2.40G
DDR2 800 5-5-5-18
RD780 HT 1.8G
Windows XP SP2 32bit

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 53.38 fps, 3905.32 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 52.65 fps, 3905.32 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 53.04 fps, 3905.32 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 52.86 fps, 3905.32 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 12.86 fps, 3953.23 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 12.86 fps, 3953.23 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 12.86 fps, 3953.23 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 12.84 fps, 3953.23 kb/s

[aicjofs]

@aicjofs
same case here too bud and wat kind of rad is that ??

That's the swiftech. A thermochill is far and away better rad, but I had never tried a Swifty so I gave it a shot on this build. Allows better spacing for cable/tubing runs since it's thinner. Much dirtier then any thermochill I have had, required numerous flushings.

Gray already asked above, but what are you running there?

[Blue_MiSfit]

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 57.39 fps, 3904.94 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 58.19 fps, 3904.94 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 58.34 fps, 3904.94 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 58.22 fps, 3904.94 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 28.68 fps, 3974.08 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 28.59 fps, 3974.08 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 28.62 fps, 3974.08 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 28.65 fps, 3974.08 kb/s



On an octo-core (2x quad) Xeon X5355 2.66 GHz on Server 2003 32 bit. 2 GB FB-DIMM 667 MHz @ 4/4/4/12

Pretty zippy!
~MiSfit

[jay78]

mobo = Asus P5E3 Deluxe wifi
CPU = Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4ghz OC at 400fsb 3.6ghz
Ram = 2x1gb patriot pc10666 1333mhz 7-7-7-20 OC at1603mhz
Ram = 2x2gb Corsair xms3 12800 1600mhz 7-7-7-20 oc at1603mhz
both ram set at 9-9-9-24 cpu-z show 800mhz
Video = Nvidia 8800GTX
Sound = Auzentech X-Fi Prelude 7.1
HDD = 150gb Raptor, 500gb Segate 7200rpm
Speakers = Logitech z5300
Monitor = Envision 22"
PS = OCZ 850watts

WC system
CPU = EK-Supreme
GPU = Danger Den
Pump = Laing D5
RES = EK-Multioption 250 Rev2
Rad = Thermochill 120.3
Fans = Silverstone FM123
Tubing = Tygon 1/2"

for more pics ck out the link
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?p=2740391#post2740391

[Blue_MiSfit]

Results for x264.exe v0.58.747
encoded 1442 frames, 57.00 fps, 3904.94 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 58.63 fps, 3904.94 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 58.41 fps, 3904.94 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 58.67 fps, 3904.94 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 28.65 fps, 3974.08 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 28.56 fps, 3974.08 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 28.58 fps, 3974.08 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 28.50 fps, 3974.08 kb/s

Results for x264.exe v0.59.819M
encoded 1442 frames, 58.74 fps, 3895.56 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 59.16 fps, 3895.96 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 59.05 fps, 3894.82 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 59.16 fps, 3895.56 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 31.92 fps, 3981.22 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 31.91 fps, 3981.30 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 31.89 fps, 3981.63 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 31.99 fps, 3981.30 kb/s


System Details
--------------
Name Intel Xeon X5355
Name Intel Xeon X5355
Codename Clovertown
Codename Clovertown
Specification Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5355 @ 2.66GHz
Specification Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5355 @ 2.66GHz
Core Stepping B3
Core Stepping B3
Technology 65 nm
Technology 65 nm
Stock frequency 2666 MHz
Stock frequency 2666 MHz
Core Speed 2660.4 MHz (8.0 x 332.5 MHz)
Core Speed 2660.4 MHz (8.0 x 332.5 MHz)
FID range 6.0x - 8.0x
FID range 6.0x - 8.0x

Northbridge Intel 5000X rev. 12
Southbridge Intel 6321ESB rev. 09

Memory Frequency 266.0 MHz (5:4)
Memory Type FB-DDR2
Memory Size 2048 MBytes

Windows Version Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition (Build 3790)

max VID 1.350 V
max VID 1.350 V
Number of processors 2
Number of threads 8
Number of threads 4 (max 4)
Number of threads 4 (max 4)
L2 cache 2 x 4096 KBytes, 16-way set associative, 64-byte line size
L2 cache 2 x 4096 KBytes, 16-way set associative, 64-byte line size
Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EM64T
Instructions sets MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EM64T
Package Socket 771 LGA (platform ID = 6h)
Package Socket 771 LGA (platform ID = 6h)

Temperature sensor 0 59°C (138°F) [0x29] (core #0)
Temperature sensor 1 59°C (138°F) [0x29] (core #1)
Temperature sensor 2 57°C (134°F) [0x2B] (core #2)
Temperature sensor 3 56°C (132°F) [0x2C] (core #3)
Temperature sensor 0 67°C (152°F) [0x21] (core #0)
Temperature sensor 1 67°C (152°F) [0x21] (core #1)
Temperature sensor 2 62°C (143°F) [0x26] (core #2)
Temperature sensor 3 61°C (141°F) [0x27] (core #3)



New benchmark :)

[Adub]

That sucker runs hot!

[Blue_MiSfit]

Yeah she does, but its a Dell system in a fat server room that's also a tad hot ;)

Shouldn't be an issue when we move soon

~MiSfit

[graysky]

@jay - thanks... running Vista x64 or XP x64?
@blue_misfit - thanks... for the data dude!

To everyone else - blue_misfit ran the "new" version of the benchmark that is available publicly now!

There are two major changes:

1) CPU-Z outputs the hardware details automatically and the batch file greps out what I need so you don't have to manually provide me with details (see the report in blue's post above for a sample).

2) I included a newer version of x264 that is a bit faster than the version that was included back in the first part of March when the benchmark launched. I'll ALWAYS keep that original version so you can compare back to historical data, after all, the magnitude of the data isn't that important to see which system is faster than another, but it is kinda cool to see the speed increases as the software matures.

Quads tend to run 9-10 % faster with the new version.
Single core chips are anywhere from 5-15 % faster. I'll be sure to select some representative examples (AMD/Intel Quads, Duals, singles, etc.) and highlight them in the excel spreadsheet I've been maintaining and that is freely available at the techarp website.

Here are the comparative data for a Q6600 and Q9300 for now:

http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/6619/graphfg0.gif
As I said, about 9-10 % faster.

[jay78]

graysky
@jay - thanks... running Vista x64 or XP x64?



answer is all of em...

i am running
xp 32bit and xp64bit both.....
and
also vista ultimate 32bit
used xp 32bit to run the banchmark....