compusic
7th March 2008, 10:02
we know that a encoder based on MPEG compressing technology requires that video frame's pixel number should be integer times of 16. For example a 480X272 video frame, both 480 and 272 are integer times of 16.
for vegas 7 and previous version, for a 480X270 project ( a 16:9 project), if I want to render the video using mp4 or 264 encoder, even I set the frame to 480X270 in the encoder's setting tab, the encoder will change the frame to 480X272. I thought I knew why, since it's a MPEG encoder.
but waite, now the same project in VEGAS 8, render using mp4 or 264 encoder, if I set the output frame to 480X270 in the encoder, the encoder will not change it. the rendered video is definitely 480X270! I have cheked it using Gspot.
then why? how can this happen? does VEGAS 8 have another advanced encoder? or the MPEG compressing standard has changed or improved?
thanks.
for vegas 7 and previous version, for a 480X270 project ( a 16:9 project), if I want to render the video using mp4 or 264 encoder, even I set the frame to 480X270 in the encoder's setting tab, the encoder will change the frame to 480X272. I thought I knew why, since it's a MPEG encoder.
but waite, now the same project in VEGAS 8, render using mp4 or 264 encoder, if I set the output frame to 480X270 in the encoder, the encoder will not change it. the rendered video is definitely 480X270! I have cheked it using Gspot.
then why? how can this happen? does VEGAS 8 have another advanced encoder? or the MPEG compressing standard has changed or improved?
thanks.