Resize calculator PHP

[smok3]

windows standalone version (wapache stuff)
request it
(only tested with win xp)

install/run
1. unpack to some dir
2. run resizeCalc.exe

[krosswindz]

^ :thanks: wicked :p

[smok3]

10000 hits! :P

[krosswindz]

^ congrats :p

[b66pak]

windows standalone version (wapache stuff)
request it
(only tested with win xp)

install/run
1. unpack to some dir
2. run resizeCalc.exe


is this still available?...i don't find the link (on the first page)...
_

[smok3]

b66pak: link is in your pm.

[b66pak]

thanks a lot...
_

[Nightshiver]

Could I have the link as well? The old hasn't been working for me for months, and I didn't know if you were still working on it or if the site had just gone done for some other reason.

[Guest]

Could it be this:

http://smok3.t35.com/resize/

smok3, if you didn't want that public let me know and I will nuke my post.

[smok3]

the two working mirrors are in the 1st post (the section named 'running at').
edit: wapache = windows.exe version also reuploaded, see 1st post.

[smok3]

have managed to get it running at sourceforge, hopefully this will be a bit more faster/permanent, see 1st post for url :)

[smok3]

beta15 now online (reports "human DAR"), see 1st post for url.

[b66pak]

thanks a lot...
_

[smok3]

thanks a lot...
_

your welcome ...

btw,
the new human DAR display is now 'fully' integrated.
One usable feature would be to display that DAR after pad/crop as well, but i haven't found time yet to do that. Meantime any bug reports are welcome (for this beta). Source code is also there (link in the 1st post + usual ugliness warning).

[asteri]

Hello,

I need help with correct settings for ResizeCalc. I am confused about set proper option in Source - PAR.

In what cases should i use PAL(702) vs. PAL(720) and PAL wide (702) vs. PAL wide (720) ?

I encoding mainly HD content where is simple calculate corect resolution but with this old staff I am not sure.

Thanks to anyone for explanation

[smok3]

@asteri, some good reading;
http://lipas.uwasa.fi/~f76998/video/conversion

[asteri]

@asteri, some good reading;
http://lipas.uwasa.fi/~f76998/video/conversion

Hi, I have read it but I am not sure. If I have source PAL 720x576 should I always choose PAR 720 or sometimes 702? Can you please check these few examples (7 pictures) and tell me correct source PAR setting?

Thank you

http://s30.postimg.org/y8v1bmxct/image.png (http://postimg.org/image/y8v1bmxct/)http://s30.postimg.org/3xxh0x8il/image.png (http://postimg.org/image/3xxh0x8il/)http://s30.postimg.org/cl6316wyl/image.png (http://postimg.org/image/cl6316wyl/)http://s30.postimg.org/nol3t1sv1/image.png (http://postimg.org/image/nol3t1sv1/)http://s30.postimg.org/kggmg06l9/image.png (http://postimg.org/image/kggmg06l9/)http://s30.postimg.org/nei6ng3ml/image.png (http://postimg.org/image/nei6ng3ml/)http://s30.postimg.org/os5850di5/image.png (http://postimg.org/image/os5850di5/)

[smok3]

asteri; Seriously in this point in time I would consider SD something not really worth wasting a lot of time with, i'd just use something like

http://resizecalc.sourceforge.net/index.php?ssmw=720&sar=1.459&sar2=&ssmh=576&CT=2&CL=8&CR=8&CB=2&mplayCrop=&trw=&dar=1&dar2=&modw=&modh=&padw=&padh=&css=&doit=true

for everything and be done with it.

Actually I wouldn't scale it at all, just use 16:9 DAR or PAR while transcoding.

Btw; how did you get national geo / discovery to be so stupidly interlaced?

[asteri]

I know SD is dead, but some old movies still need do from SD source, so I would welcome to know how to choose PAR properly. Just for the info, the first example is not WS so use 16:9 generally is not good choice.
So should I choose 702 (PAL/PAL wide) instead of 720? Why? Because of cropping a lot pixels of the borders? So if I am cropping for example more then 8 8 (L R) then should I use 702 for calculation instead of 720?


About interlacing NatGeo and Discovery. It is not question for me. My TV broadcast provider use this method. NatGeoHD and Discovery HD are ok, but there are another tv shows so I cant capture from HD :/

[smok3]

cropping doesn't affect things, since they are PAR based, but from the look of the black borders i'd say the correct version is the 702 method (but there will not be much difference whatever you use).