Log in

View Full Version : Current Patches, Where to get them, How they affect speed/output


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 [64] 65 66 67 68 69

Atak_Snajpera
14th April 2010, 18:15
I always use ffshow.

Blue_MiSfit
15th April 2010, 07:52
@Roozhou:

Suppose you had a very high quality ~10-20mbps 480p H.264 file (or a whole giant lot of them, in my case), and you wanted to transcode them to various CBR bitrates as quickly as possible without totally looking like crap. A good way to do this is via 1 pass CBR encodes with --preset veryfast, or thereabouts. It works very well for my purposes anyway, and you can get insanely high transcoding speeds this way.

While it's true that my testing has only been via FFMS2 in AviSynth, my script is usually otherwise empty. Therefore, I would expect similar performance when using x264 directly on the sources, via its internal FFMS2 when built with ffmpeg-mt.

~MiSfit

roozhou
15th April 2010, 09:33
While it's true that my testing has only been via FFMS2 in AviSynth, my script is usually otherwise empty. Therefore, I would expect similar performance when using x264 directly on the sources, via its internal FFMS2 when built with ffmpeg-mt.
~MiSfit
FFMS2 needs extra indexing so it is not suitable for high-speed transcoding.

And if you have a lot of videos, spawning multiple encodings gives faster speed and better quality because you don't have to use multi-threaded encoding.

Blue_MiSfit
15th April 2010, 09:49
Maybe true, but indexing the source can sometimes be worth the additional time.

Regarding the whole "spawn multiple encodes vs use more threads" debate, I dunno... I've always been more comfortable with the idea of being able to rush through a single file if I needed to, versus always running a bunch of single or lightly threaded encodes.

I do totally agree that in theory it should be faster / better quality to do the latter, but I would bet the differences would be minor, especially since on a large scale, you would cause a lot more random I/O activity. But, I'm getting off-topic.

Regardless, I think ffmpeg-mt is very nice to have in x264 when I simply want to take an existing H.264 file and transcode to a lower bitrate as quickly as possible. I actually use this same method to transcode content from unrestricted / High@4.1 down to a lower level for device compatibility (iPhone etc). I do this alllll the time when I'm in a hurry, and headed to the gym, laudromat, or airport in need of new media to consume. :)

~MiSfit

rack04
19th April 2010, 21:16
Toolchain:
gcc 4.4.3
gpac 0.4.6-dev revison 5
pthreads 2.9.0.0 gc-static
yasm 1.0.0
x264_x86_r1542M_Generic (http://www.multiupload.com/TUI1S1IW3D)

Platform: X86
System: MINGW
asm: yes
avs input: yes
lavf input: yes
ffms input: yes
mp4 output: yes
pthread: yes
debug: no
gprof: no
PIC: no
shared: no
visualize: no

Patches:
x264.open-gop.19_r1542 (http://pastebin.com/MbKdh684) <Trahald>
ffmpeg_static_pthreads_r22912 (http://pastebin.com/xyQiwPYD) <angustia>
ffms2_threads_fix_r309 (http://pastebin.com/FppV5KE6) <komisar>
x264_x86_r1542M_Generic (http://www.multiupload.com/OOBVLDAYLL)

Platform: X86
System: MINGW
asm: yes
avs input: yes
lavf input: yes
ffms input: yes
mp4 output: yes
pthread: yes
filters: resize select_every
debug: no
gprof: no
PIC: no
shared: no
visualize: no

Patches:
x264.open-gop.19_r1542 (http://pastebin.com/MbKdh684) <Trahald>
x264_filtering_r1542 (http://pastebin.com/Xqv2G1bS) <kemuri-_9>
ffmpeg_static_pthreads_r22912 (http://pastebin.com/xyQiwPYD) <angustia>
ffms2_threads_fix_r309 (http://pastebin.com/FppV5KE6) <komisar>

outlaw.78
21st April 2010, 00:39
x264 0.93.1542 x64 & x86 (http://www.mediafire.com/?m5rghmbjxyz)

gcc 4.5.0
ffmpeg svn 22926
swscale svn 31053
ffms2 svn 309
pthreads 2.9.0.0 static
x264 0.93.1542 x86,x64,amdfam10,fprofiled

bob0r
21st April 2010, 01:56
pthreads 2.9.0.0 static
Where does this made up version come from?

kemuri-_9
21st April 2010, 02:43
Where does this made up version come from?

pthread.h:

/*
* See the README file for an explanation of the pthreads-win32 version
* numbering scheme and how the DLL is named etc.
*/
#define PTW32_VERSION 2,9,0,0
#define PTW32_VERSION_STRING "2, 9, 0, 0\0"

roozhou
21st April 2010, 04:51
pthread.h:

/*
* See the README file for an explanation of the pthreads-win32 version
* numbering scheme and how the DLL is named etc.
*/
#define PTW32_VERSION 2,9,0,0
#define PTW32_VERSION_STRING "2, 9, 0, 0\0"


Where can i get the source code of pthreads-win32 2.9.0.0?

Audionut
21st April 2010, 06:46
x264_x86_r1542M_Generic

Platform: X86
System: MINGW
asm: yes
avs input: yes
lavf input: yes
ffms input: yes
mp4 output: yes
pthread: yes
filters: resize select_every
debug: no
gprof: no
PIC: no
shared: no
visualize: no

Patches:
x264.open-gop.19_r1542 (http://pastebin.com/MbKdh684) <Trahald>
x264_filtering_r1542 (http://pastebin.com/Xqv2G1bS) <kemuri-_9>
ffmpeg_static_pthreads_r22912 (http://pastebin.com/xyQiwPYD) <angustia>
ffms2_threads_fix_r309 (http://pastebin.com/FppV5KE6) <komisar>

Hi rack04, any chance of a 64bit build with these patches?

LoRd_MuldeR
21st April 2010, 11:01
Where can i get the source code of pthreads-win32 2.9.0.0?

http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/pthreads/?cvsroot=pthreads-win32

alexins
21st April 2010, 11:48
Where can i get the source code of pthreads-win32 2.9.0.0?

http://sources.redhat.com/pthreads-win32/
cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@sourceware.org:/cvs/pthreads-win32 login
{enter ``anoncvs'' for the password}
cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@sourceware.org:/cvs/pthreads-win32 checkout pthreads

rack04
22nd April 2010, 03:00
Toolchain:
gcc 4.4.3
gpac 0.4.6-dev revison 5
pthreads 2.9.0.0 gc-static
yasm 1.0.0
LAVF/FFMS Builds:
ffmpeg svn22939 and libswscale svn31054 (http://www.multiupload.com/8MEH109002)
ffms2 svn310 (http://www.multiupload.com/M7ITP46POL)
x264 Builds:
x264_x86_r1542M (http://www.multiupload.com/VNMD003PNB)

Platform: X86
System: MINGW
asm: yes
avs input: yes
lavf input: yes
ffms input: yes
mp4 output: yes
pthread: yes
filters: resize select_every
debug: no
gprof: no
PIC: no
shared: no
visualize: no
x264_x64_r1542M (http://www.multiupload.com/IEIPFI7PMR)

Platform: X86_64
System: MINGW
asm: yes
avs input: yes
lavf input: yes
ffms input: yes
mp4 output: yes
pthread: yes
filters: resize select_every
debug: no
gprof: no
PIC: no
shared: no
visualize: no
Patches:
x264.open-gop.19_r1542 (http://pastebin.com/MbKdh684) <Trahald>
x264_filtering_r1542 (http://pastebin.com/Xqv2G1bS) <kemuri-_9>
ffmpeg_static_pthreads_r22912 (http://pastebin.com/xyQiwPYD) <angustia>
ffms2_threads_fix_r309 (http://pastebin.com/FppV5KE6) <komisar>

outlaw.78
24th April 2010, 23:08
x264 0.94.1564 x64 & x86 (http://www.mediafire.com/?nqjdmmm2ilm)

gcc 4.5.0
ffmpeg svn 22960
swscale svn 31067
ffms2 svn 310
pthreads 2.9.0.0 static
x264 0.94.1564 x86,x64,amdfam10,fprofiled

alwa
28th April 2010, 15:43
Hello,
i've tried today to compile x264 with the new 2.7 release of the GCC frontend for llvm. (http://llvm.org/releases/download.html#2.7)
It produces a smaller executable than GCC, that sadly crashes immediately (standard configuration no ffmpeg stuff). But if asm is disabled the executable works (at least with the default x264 stettings so far).
The the first speed impressions are disillusioning.
With the x264 default settings on SOCCER_704x576_30fps.yuv with a Q9550:
~13fps gcc executable
~9fps llvm executable
(i'know no stdev and stuff, but llvm builds still seem to be clearly slower)

Maybe some x264 dev can take a look on compiles with llvm (if not already done) and diagnose the asm problem and figure out if there would be any benefit in supporting llvm.

I'm aware that the compiler is not that important for the speed of x264, i just wanted to put some thoughts out there.

rack04
3rd May 2010, 14:42
Toolchain:
GCC 4.4.3
GPAC 0.4.6-DEV Revison 5
Pthreads 2.9.0.0 GC-static
Yasm 1.0.0
LAVF/FFMS Builds:

ffmpeg SVN-r23012M and libswscale SVN-r31128M (http://www.multiupload.com/YWJ7FHCXS5)
ffms2 SVN-r311M (http://www.multiupload.com/6OJPV3X6LU)
LAVF/FFMS Patches:
ffmpeg_static_pthreads_r23011 (http://pastebin.com/0LMeaBqt) <angustia>
libswscale_x64_fix_r31032 (http://pastebin.com/0yAGkLXC) <BugMaster>
ffms2_threads_fix_r309 (http://pastebin.com/i0M5EuHs) <komisar>
x264 Builds:

x264_x64_r1570M_Generic (http://www.multiupload.com/PBQK3WN7OC)
Platform: X86_64
System: MINGW
asm: yes
avs input: yes
lavf input: yes
ffms input: yes
mp4 output: yes
pthread: yes
debug: no
gprof: no
PIC: no
shared: no
visualize: no
x264_x86_r1570M_Generic (http://www.multiupload.com/3KHHTA89IC)
Platform: X86
System: MINGW
asm: yes
avs input: yes
lavf input: yes
ffms input: yes
mp4 output: yes
pthread: yes
debug: no
gprof: no
PIC: no
shared: no
visualize: no
x264 Patches:
x264_sws_typecast_r1570 (http://pastebin.com/78yXue1H) <komisar>
x264_demuxer_threads_r1570 (http://pastebin.com/rQpuTTAY) <komisar>
x264.open-gop.20_r1570 (http://pastebin.com/LiDUepz8) <Trahald>

kemuri-_9
4th May 2010, 00:29
gcc 4.4.4 and gcc 4.5.0 are out, builders still using 4.4.3 should update to one of them.

Audionut
4th May 2010, 04:51
rack04, could you include this patch, http://x264.fushizen.eu/patches/x264_fade_compensation-1542.diff
in your next build please.

rack04
4th May 2010, 15:58
Toolchain:
GCC 4.4.3
GPAC 0.4.6-DEV Revison 5
Pthreads 2.9.0.0 GC-static
Yasm 1.0.0
LAVF/FFMS Builds:

ffmpeg SVN-r23022M and libswscale SVN-r31137M (http://www.multiupload.com/7NABARIGI0)
ffms2 SVN-r311M (http://www.multiupload.com/APHVP0EDF9)
LAVF/FFMS Patches:
ffmpeg_static_pthreads_r23016 (http://pastebin.com/f8NWT5j5) <angustia>
libswscale_x64_fix_r31032 (http://pastebin.com/0yAGkLXC) <BugMaster>
ffms2_threads_fix_r309 (http://pastebin.com/i0M5EuHs) <komisar>
x264 Builds:

x264_x64_r1570M (http://www.multiupload.com/IZX18M32JD)
Platform: X86_64
System: MINGW
asm: yes
avs input: yes
lavf input: yes
ffms input: yes
mp4 output: yes
pthread: yes
debug: no
gprof: no
PIC: no
shared: no
visualize: no
x264_x86_r1570M (http://www.multiupload.com/2P68UNJPX7)
Platform: X86
System: MINGW
asm: yes
avs input: yes
lavf input: yes
ffms input: yes
mp4 output: yes
pthread: yes
debug: no
gprof: no
PIC: no
shared: no
visualize: no
x264 Patches:
x264_sws_typecast_r1570 (http://pastebin.com/78yXue1H) <komisar>
x264_demuxer_threads_r1570 (http://pastebin.com/rQpuTTAY) <komisar>
x264.open-gop.20_r1570 (http://pastebin.com/LiDUepz8) <Trahald>
x264_fade_compensation_r1570_v2 (http://pastebin.com/dhCNv6bx) <Dark Shikari>

julius666
4th May 2010, 16:13
rack04, could you include this patch, http://x264.fushizen.eu/patches/x264_fade_compensation-1542.diff
in your next build please.

What changes do this patch make?

JEEB
4th May 2010, 19:50
Basically makes use of x264's internal fade-finding mechanism and assigns more bits to those places that are "marked" as fades. Works when mbtree is on with weightp 0 and 2 IIRC.

Adds a setting that controls the strength of this feature (how strong the effect is).

--fade-compensate <float> Allocate more bits to fades [0.0]
Approximate sane range: 0.0 - 1.0

Edit: A small fix pointed out by VFR Maniac. Line 19 on the pastebin'd 1570 patch, change %2.f to %.2f

outlaw.78
5th May 2010, 00:56
x264 0.94.1570 x64 & x86 (http://www.mediafire.com/?wbddnmnwh2a) AMD

gcc 4.5.1 20100429 pre-release
ffmpeg svn 23017
swscale svn 31136
ffms2 svn 311
pthreads 2.9.0.0 static
x264 0.94.1570 x86,x64,amdfam10,fprofiled

Audionut
5th May 2010, 04:51
Thanks rack04. Were you aware of the fix before you made your build?

rack04
5th May 2010, 13:07
Thanks rack04. Were you aware of the fix before you made your build?

No. I will post updated builds soon.

jpsdr
5th May 2010, 13:17
Not too soon maybe, open-gop have seems to have a high probability to update to 21 soon...
BTW, thanks for your builds.

rack04
5th May 2010, 19:18
Not too soon maybe, open-gop have seems to have a high probability to update to 21 soon...
BTW, thanks for your builds.

I edited my previous post with a new x264 build patched with x264_fade_compensation_r1570_v2 (http://pastebin.com/dhCNv6bx)

rack04
6th May 2010, 16:00
Toolchain:
GCC 4.4.3
GPAC 0.4.6-DEV Revison 5
Pthreads 2.9.0.0 GC-static
Yasm 1.0.0
LAVF/FFMS Builds:

ffmpeg SVN-r23034M and libswscale SVN-r31139M (http://www.multiupload.com/ZBG0S2KPMR)
ffms2 SVN-r311M (http://www.multiupload.com/2ANQARVAO1)
LAVF/FFMS Patches:
ffmpeg_static_pthreads_r23016 (http://pastebin.com/f8NWT5j5) <angustia>
libswscale_x64_fix_r31032 (http://pastebin.com/0yAGkLXC) <BugMaster>
ffms2_threads_fix_r309 (http://pastebin.com/i0M5EuHs) <komisar>
x264 Builds:

x264_x64_r1583M (http://www.multiupload.com/QZ3ED30O1S)
Platform: X86_64
System: MINGW
asm: yes
avs input: yes
lavf input: yes
ffms input: yes
mp4 output: yes
pthread: yes
debug: no
gprof: no
PIC: no
shared: no
visualize: no
x264_x86_r1583M (http://www.multiupload.com/UJX3V6BZPV)
Platform: X86
System: MINGW
asm: yes
avs input: yes
lavf input: yes
ffms input: yes
mp4 output: yes
pthread: yes
debug: no
gprof: no
PIC: no
shared: no
visualize: no
x264 Patches:
x264_sws_typecast_r1570 (http://pastebin.com/78yXue1H) <komisar>
x264_demuxer_threads_r1570 (http://pastebin.com/rQpuTTAY) <komisar>
x264.open-gop.20_r1583 (http://pastebin.com/uEsyh9Xf) <Trahald>
x264_fade_compensation_r1583 (http://pastebin.com/bfL8MNgR) <Dark Shikari>

I will post some GCC 4.4.4 builds later to compare to GCC 4.4.3.

EDIT: I get a segmentation fault when trying to build ffmpeg using GCC 4.4.4.

alexins
6th May 2010, 18:11
EDIT: I get a segmentation fault when trying to build ffmpeg using GCC 4.4.4.

I did build x 264, using GCC 4.4.4 (Stable) (http://www.xvidvideo.ru/2009-10-22-10-49-14/doc_details/3567-cross-mingw-x86x64-201004292200-with-gcc-444-stable-pthreads-290-static.html). No error, here's a detailed logs build ffmpeg, ffms2, gpac, x 264 (http://www.mediafire.com/?riz2czdfdnm).

rack04
6th May 2010, 19:56
I did build x 264, using GCC 4.4.4 (Stable) (http://www.xvidvideo.ru/2009-10-22-10-49-14/doc_details/3567-cross-mingw-x86x64-201004292200-with-gcc-444-stable-pthreads-290-static.html). No error, here's a detailed logs build ffmpeg, ffms2, gpac, x 264 (http://www.mediafire.com/?riz2czdfdnm).

This is what I get when i cross compile x64 ffmpeg using GCC 4.4.4.

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a199/rack04/untitled.jpg

kemuri-_9
7th May 2010, 00:18
it works fine here with komisar's gcc 4.4.4 binutil set, so try that instead i guess.

roozhou
7th May 2010, 05:02
This is what I get when i cross compile x64 ffmpeg using GCC 4.4.4.

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a199/rack04/untitled.jpg
Try "make" instead of "make -j2/-j4".

burfadel
7th May 2010, 09:42
Just curious, is it known how useful all the new instructions coming out at the end of the year and next year will be, on processors that support them? Like AvX, CVT16 etc?

bob0r
7th May 2010, 11:20
Also a ffmpeg error here on gcc 4.4.4:


CC libavcodec/dsputil.o
libavcodec/dsputil.c: In function 'put_h264_qpel2_mc10_c':
libavcodec/dsputil.c:2586: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
make: *** [libavcodec/dsputil.o] Error 1


Latest working ffmpeg git revision: 22940

Side note: the same file, dsputil.c segmentation faulted before, then on gcc 4.4.3.
It was fixed 1 days after pasting it in #ffmpeg, but that was a coincidence i guess.
(i have how ever pasted it again :p)

rack04
7th May 2010, 12:07
Try "make" instead of "make -j2/-j4".

I used "make". BTW, I have no problem cross compiling x64 ffmpeg using GCC 4.4.4 in x64 Win7 but I get the error above in x32 WinXP.

roozhou
7th May 2010, 12:57
I used "make". BTW, I have no problem cross compiling x64 ffmpeg using GCC 4.4.4 in x64 Win7 but I get the error above in x32 WinXP.
I got the same error with TDM's GCC 4.4.1 long ago. You can also try qp gcc builds (http://code.google.com/p/qp-gcc/downloads/list).

juGGaKNot
9th May 2010, 20:20
Need a generic gcc 4.4.4 32bit build with fade compensation guys.

anyone ?

[ReX]
9th May 2010, 21:15
Need a generic gcc 4.4.4 32bit build with fade compensation guys.

anyone ?

ffmpeg/ffms2 is a little old, but not too much (not even a month old if I remember).

Only patch used: x264_fade_compensation_r1583
GCC 4.4.4 x86
make fprofiled
http://www.mediafire.com/?zyzymyvyzmn

rack04
10th May 2010, 20:28
I got the same error with TDM's GCC 4.4.1 long ago. You can also try qp gcc builds (http://code.google.com/p/qp-gcc/downloads/list).

Turns out it is a bug in ffmpeg. It has been reproduced and reported by angustia. Evidently it will work if you don't disable filters.

juGGaKNot
11th May 2010, 21:08
;1398603']ffmpeg/ffms2 is a little old, but not too much (not even a month old if I remember).

Only patch used: x264_fade_compensation_r1583
GCC 4.4.4 x86
make fprofiled
http://www.mediafire.com/?zyzymyvyzmn

thnx.

jsday187
12th May 2010, 22:32
Is there a possiblilty of getting an up to date DLL of ffms2 with thread fix patch separate from these builds?

burfadel
13th May 2010, 13:01
You mean an avisynth ffms2 filter so you can us ffvideosource? I second the request with an automated thankyou!

[ReX]
13th May 2010, 14:15
I think it was fixed, so there's no need for patch.
http://code.google.com/p/ffmpegsource/source/detail?r=312

rack04
15th May 2010, 21:16
Toolchain:
GCC 4.4.4
GPAC 0.4.6-DEV
Pthreads 2.9.0.0
YASM 1.0.0
x264 Builds:
x264_x86_r1583M (http://www.multiupload.com/BHUIZOAYGH)

Platform: X86
System: MINGW
asm: yes
avs input: yes
lavf input: yes
ffms input: yes
mp4 output: yes
pthread: yes
debug: no
gprof: no
PIC: no
shared: no
visualize: no
x264_x64_r1583M (http://www.multiupload.com/4LBMK9508B)

Platform: X86_64
System: MINGW
asm: yes
avs input: yes
lavf input: yes
ffms input: yes
mp4 output: yes
pthread: yes
debug: no
gprof: no
PIC: no
shared: no
visualize: no
Patches:
x264_sws_typecast_r1570 (http://pastebin.com/2D94ZEm7) <komisar>
x264_demuxer_threads_r1570 (http://pastebin.com/X8uQdiE9) <komisar>
x264.open-gop.22 (http://pastebin.com/363tDMnb) <Trahald>
x264_fade_compensation_r1583 (http://pastebin.com/yfwNyqxG) <Dark Shikari>

rack04
18th May 2010, 14:56
Toolchain:
GCC 4.4.4
GPAC 0.4.6-DEV Rev 5
Pthreads 2.9.0.0
Yasm 1.0.0
LAVF/FFMS Builds:

ffmpeg SVN-r23156M and libswscale SVN-r31179M (http://www.multiupload.com/60DNAC7CSR)
ffms2 SVN-r312 (http://www.multiupload.com/43NOZEOH35)
LAVF/FFMS Patches:
ffmpeg_static_pthreads_r23179 (http://codetidy.com/42) <angustia>
libswscale_x64_fix_r31032 (http://codetidy.com/44) <BugMaster>
x264 Builds:

x264_x64_r1592M (http://www.multiupload.com/VL5W219EDI)
Platform: X86_64
System: MINGW
asm: yes
avs input: yes
lavf input: yes
ffms input: yes
mp4 output: yes
pthread: yes
debug: no
gprof: no
PIC: no
shared: no
visualize: no
x264_x86_r1592M (http://www.multiupload.com/W2U7A8DF7I)
Platform: X86
System: MINGW
asm: yes
avs input: yes
lavf input: yes
ffms input: yes
mp4 output: yes
pthread: yes
debug: no
gprof: no
PIC: no
shared: no
visualize: no
x264 Patches:
x264_sws_typecast_r1570 (http://codetidy.com/45) <komisar>
x264_demuxer_threads_r1570 (http://codetidy.com/46) <komisar>
x264.open-gop.22_r1592 (http://codetidy.com/47) <Trahald>
x264_fade_compensation_r1583 (http://codetidy.com/48) <Dark Shikari>

rack04
20th May 2010, 18:38
Toolchain:
GCC 4.4.4
GPAC 0.4.6-DEV Rev 5
Pthreads 2.9.0.0
Yasm 1.0.0
LAVF/FFMS Builds:

ffmpeg SVN-r23201M and libswscale SVN-r31186M (http://www.multiupload.com/QSJ47SDG8N)
ffms2 SVN-r312 (http://www.multiupload.com/I9MTBQD10P)
LAVF/FFMS Patches:
ffmpeg_static_pthreads_r23179 (http://pastebin.com/Phx49DGt) <angustia>
llibswscale_x64_fix_r31032 (http://pastebin.com/hNQGLpYm) <BugMaster>
x264 Builds:

x264_x64_r1592M (http://www.multiupload.com/7NR8FBZQLP)
Platform: X86_64
System: MINGW
asm: yes
avs input: yes
lavf input: yes
ffms input: yes
mp4 output: yes
avi output: yes
pthread: yes
filters: resize select_every crop hqdn3d
debug: no
gprof: no
PIC: no
shared: no
visualize: no
x264_x86_r1592M (http://www.multiupload.com/56NLFZ4CUQ)
Platform: X86
System: MINGW
asm: yes
avs input: yes
lavf input: yes
ffms input: yes
mp4 output: yes
avi output: yes
pthread: yes
filters: resize select_every crop hqdn3d
debug: no
gprof: no
PIC: no
shared: no
visualize: no
x264 Patches:
x264_sws_typecast_r1570 (http://pastebin.com/qcNYfXWZ) <komisar>
x264_demuxer_threads_r1570 (http://pastebin.com/G7zjaChB) <komisar>
x264.open-gop.22_r1592 (http://pastebin.com/at39YNXN) <Trahald>
x264_fade_compensation_r1583 (http://pastebin.com/rf9EZfN2) <Dark Shikari>
x264_avi_output.v4_r1592 (http://pastebin.com/xyNNAqy6) <MasterNobody>
x264_filtering_r1592 (http://pastebin.com/98VLM5Pg) <kemuri-_9>
x264_filtering_changes_r1592 (http://pastebin.com/1eiDAmiv) <J_Darnley>

Audionut
21st May 2010, 02:44
Thanks rack04

jpsdr
23rd May 2010, 09:17
I don't know where to put it, just to notify, in the help, the default mode for nal-hrd is not specified.

rack04
24th May 2010, 17:14
Toolchain:
GCC 4.4.4
GPAC 0.4.6
Pthreads 2.9.0.0
Yasm 1.0.0
LAVF/FFMS Builds:

ffmpeg SVN-r23285M and libswscale SVN-r31206M (http://www.multiupload.com/2TYCAHXMLK)
ffms2 SVN-r312 (http://www.multiupload.com/N69SBIXUFP)
Patches:
ffmpeg_static_pthreads_r23179 (http://pastebin.com/LMuCc9hd) <angustia>
libswscale_x64_fix_r31032 (http://pastebin.com/GiDV9aVf) <BugMaster>
x264 Builds:

x264_x64_r1602 (http://www.multiupload.com/ANLADULZG0)
Platform: X86_64
System: MINGW
asm: yes
avs input: yes
lavf input: yes
ffms input: yes
mp4 output: yes
pthread: yes
debug: no
gprof: no
PIC: no
shared: no
visualize: no
x264_x86_r1602 (http://www.multiupload.com/ZIJOZK6PVP)
Platform: X86
System: MINGW
asm: yes
avs input: yes
lavf input: yes
ffms input: yes
mp4 output: yes
pthread: yes
debug: no
gprof: no
PIC: no
shared: no
visualize: no
x264_x64_r1602M (http://www.multiupload.com/PSN6VJ76VS)
Platform: X86_64
System: MINGW
asm: yes
avs input: yes
lavf input: yes
ffms input: yes
mp4 output: yes
avi output: yes
pthread: yes
filters: resize select_every crop hqdn3d
debug: no
gprof: no
PIC: no
shared: no
visualize: no
Patches:
x264_sws_typecast_r1570 (http://pastebin.com/Gj3vR7re) <komisar>
x264_demuxer_threads_r1602 (http://pastebin.com/12ECMUPX) <komisar>
x264_open-gop.22_r1602 (http://pastebin.com/enPSBBGK) <Trahald>
x264_fade_compensation_r1602 (http://pastebin.com/qw8WCBJf) <Dark Shikari>
x264_avi_output.v4_r1602 (http://pastebin.com/4sew624g) <MasterNobody>
x264_filtering_r1602 (http://pastebin.com/KEEGHzBB) <kemuri-_9>
x264_filtering_changes_r1602 (http://pastebin.com/QU9Xwxy6) <J_Darnley>
x264_x86_r1602M (http://www.multiupload.com/NTX2YJVK19)
Platform: X86
System: MINGW
asm: yes
avs input: yes
lavf input: yes
ffms input: yes
mp4 output: yes
avi output: yes
pthread: yes
filters: resize select_every crop hqdn3d
debug: no
gprof: no
PIC: no
shared: no
visualize: no
Patches:
x264_sws_typecast_r1570 (http://pastebin.com/Gj3vR7re) <komisar>
x264_demuxer_threads_r1602 (http://pastebin.com/12ECMUPX) <komisar>
x264_open-gop.22_r1602 (http://pastebin.com/enPSBBGK) <Trahald>
x264_fade_compensation_r1602 (http://pastebin.com/qw8WCBJf) <Dark Shikari>
x264_avi_output.v4_r1602 (http://pastebin.com/4sew624g) <MasterNobody>
x264_filtering_r1602 (http://pastebin.com/KEEGHzBB) <kemuri-_9>
x264_filtering_changes_r1602 (http://pastebin.com/QU9Xwxy6) <J_Darnley>

tormento
24th May 2010, 17:28
@ rack04

Using x264_x64_r1602M I get the error

raw [error]: raw input requires a resolution

rack04
24th May 2010, 17:33
@ rack04

Using x264_x64_r1602M I get the error

raw [error]: raw input requires a resolution

http://doom10.org/index.php?topic=177.msg2130#msg2130