SMH.com.au article "Cracking Hollywood's code"

[casio7131]

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2007/03/14/1173722475394.html

They describe doom9.org as "a famous haunt for crackers and pirates" (not quite the high point, but close :) [see news 25/2/2007]).

[kumi]

Can you imagine what they'd describe doom9.org if rule 6 weren't so strictly enforced?

"...doom9.org, a famous haunt for terrorists and cannibals..."

[foxyshadis]

Hmm. That's a very good point. We need to add a clause on the consumption of flesh, that way we have some legal authority for when the inevitable zombie hordes attack the forum. Being caught unaware in an outbreak could be the end of the forum as we know it.

[shevegen]

I totally object to their statements.

But anyway, I think I'd rather want to be called a pirate than a
suckdog for lobbyists like... some others are.
;-)

Maybe they should try to understand what a forum is...

(But ok to be more fair, the article isnt that bad as I depicted here ;P)

[Doom9]

Isn't that the same article the BBC ran with? I read the first sentence and thought it sounded familiar... and so did the description of this forum.

[Shinigami-Sama]

Hey doom9 ever consider trying to slam them for slander of your good name ;)

[zambelli]

I wonder if MS printing services would let me put "cracker and pirate" on my Microsoft business card. :D

[Mug Funky]

@ Zambelli: you should totally do that.