Log in

View Full Version : which codec do you prefer and why?


fenomeno83
8th March 2007, 14:45
Choose your prefered video codec

DeeGee
8th March 2007, 15:07
Asking this in the MPEG-4 AVC part of the forum "might" skew the results...

bob0r
8th March 2007, 16:08
:stupid:

bond
8th March 2007, 21:08
moved

e-Pawel
8th March 2007, 22:01
I chose x264, but If I could I would mark both x264 and Xvid. They are both great codecs, but intended for slightly different purposes (I guess :) ). x264 and Xvid prove open-source applications not only to be able to keep up with but also to be superior to commercial solutions!

LoRd_MuldeR
9th March 2007, 00:09
When I started with video encoding, I used DivX (as many people, I guess)
Later I switched to Xvid for a while, but then I came across x264.

Since that day, I never used any other codec :D

Mazer Rackham
9th March 2007, 06:36
I use Xvid because I encode some of my MPEG2 DVB-S recordings to AVI to watch them on my standalone DVD player. I could use DivX instead but AutoGK doesn't seem to recognize the new version 6.5 of DivX.

Appu
9th March 2007, 08:16
x264 ofcourse.. Produces better quality video compared to its closest rival xvid for a given bitrate. Encoding speed is bit low for x.264 now, but that is just a matter of time...

e-Pawel
9th March 2007, 14:22
x264 ofcourse.. Produces better quality video compared to its closest rival xvid for a given bitrate. Encoding speed is bit low for x.264 now, but that is just a matter of time...

x264 isn't Xvid's rival. x264's rival is e.g. Nero Digital AVC, while Xvid's rivals are DivX and Nero Digital ASP.

fenomeno83
9th March 2007, 14:28
In many forum there is a "war" between h264(x264-nero avc-etc...)and vp7(there isn't an mpeg4 compression)...Can you compare these 2 compression stardard?

Sirber
9th March 2007, 21:22
I moved from RealVideo to x264.

smok3
9th March 2007, 21:39
x264, because.

Brother John
10th March 2007, 01:04
Toying around with x264 from time to time, but for serious DVD backups Xvid exclusively.

My only computer and only playback device is a laptop. Xvid is clearly superiour to x264 because of its lesser decoding CPU load, which means shorter fan running time. I prefer the quieter viewing environment, and at 1/2 DVD size both encoders produce great results anyway.

If not for the fan issue I'd probably use both encoders, depending on the actual film.

gameplaya15143
14th March 2007, 02:05
at the time of the poll.. x264.. the benefits simply outweigh the costs

I hope to switch to a wavelet codec if any ever become more usable/compatible/etc.

celtic_druid
14th March 2007, 04:36
Errr, technically x264 isn't a codec. It is an encoder only.

kurt
14th March 2007, 07:39
:D

switched a while ago from xvid to x264 and didn't regret it...

falcon2000eg
15th March 2007, 09:50
first it was wmv7 then xvid and vp6 sometimes, then x264 since rev109