Log in

View Full Version : DumpHD - a HD-DVD / Blu-Ray Decrypter


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9

KenD00
15th December 2008, 22:59
Iron Man is fully BD-J, only first play (which just jumps to the first BD-J title) and topmenu (which does NOP and is hopefully prohibited) are Movie Objects, everything else is BD-J and the disc even seems to download additional BD-J's through BD-Live (because there are more BD-J objects defined than actually are on the disc).


@sl1pkn07:
First, this is an aacskeys related issue and this is not the aacskeys thread, please post in the proper thread next time. Second, my spanish isn't that good, but fortunately googles spanish is better :D


src/aacskeys.cpp:167: aviso: se descarta el valor de devolución de ‘char* getcwd(char*, size_t)’, se declaró con el atributo warn_unused_result

This *may* become a problem but so far it never has


In function ‘char* fgets(char*, int, FILE*)’,
inlined from ‘int process_media_key_block(int, bool)’ at src/aacskeys.cpp:871:
/usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:253: aviso: la llamada a ‘__fgets_chk_warn’ se redecló con aviso de atributo: fgets called with bigger size than length of destination buffer

Thats a stupid error i have missed, it doesn't hurt until you haves lines longer than 1024 chars in ProcessingDeviceKeysSimple.txt


src/aacskeys.cpp:2065: aviso: conversión obsoleta de una constante de cadena a ‘char*’

The usual deprecation warning for string literals, can be safely ignored.

Anyway, i have corrected all these warnings but because they are not a real issue i won't make a new release just for them. They will be included in a later update.

:rolleyes:

evdberg
15th December 2008, 23:52
Iron Man is fully BD-J, only first play (which just jumps to the first BD-J title) and topmenu (which does NOP and is hopefully prohibited) are Movie Objects, everything else is BD-J and the disc even seems to download additional BD-J's through BD-Live (because there are more BD-J objects defined than actually are on the disc).

To actually figure out what exactly is played back in what order i think there is no other way than to either analyse the code or execute and trace it.

Iron Man plays 00000.mpls for the main feature, so no need to analyse the code or other difficult stuff. Maybe I should refrase my question; do you know a movie title for which we should analyse BD-J code to find what to playback and in which order?

KenD00
16th December 2008, 15:31
Figuring out the main m2ts for Iron Man is indeed simple, there is only one big file and only one playlist refers it (looks like we have different discs because on mine its 00000.m2ts which is played back by 00002.mpls).

I think you are referring to these seamless branching discs where the main movie is split across several files, i don't own any of these discs but from what i have heard its usually one playlist which plays the main title, usually the biggest one, so in this case you can figure out again everything by just analysing playlists.

But i think that was not loo3aem3ON's question, i think he wants to know which playlist is active while specific content is beeing played back. And thats not so easy to see by just looking at the playlists. Ok, you are fine if most of the m2ts files are only referenced by one playlist, but its more difficult if not.

Take my I Am Legend for example. It has one m2ts for the main title, 00000.m2ts, (ok, actually two. For some stupid reason instead of using seamless branching for the alternative ending they encoded both versions as independent file so i have two 17 GB files) but there are three playlists which refer to this file, 00000.mpls, 00003.mpls, 00004.mpls, almost identical except some flags and subpaths (whatever this is, i don't know the BD specs). Now how do i know which playlist is active while watching the main title? This is not important for most of us, but maybe for someone who wants to know what BD+ content code actually announces when playing back a file ;).

:rolleyes:

chavonbravo
19th December 2008, 09:37
What would prevent this from compiling with jdk 1.4.2? Just curiosity as it would be easier for my setup to compile as such.

Doom9
19th December 2008, 12:16
DumpHD uses generics.. a Java language feature introduced in the 5.0 release (and that was released a long long time ago).

ggking7
19th December 2008, 23:05
I just tried to use dumphd-0.6 for the first time with a BD+ disc (What Happens In Vegas) and it just pegs one of my CPU cores (after: "[I] TRAP_LoadContentCode: Loading BDSVM/00001.svm (block 7)") and there doesn't seem to be any disc activity. Is this one of the discs the BDVM Debugger can't handle yet? I did notice this:


Loading BDVM... [W] No 'player/player_executable.bin' found! TRAP_DiscoveryRAM might give wrong results!
[W] No 'player/mem_area_02.bin' found! TRAP_DiscoveryRAM might give wrong results!
[W] No 'player/mem_area_03.bin' found! TRAP_DiscoveryRAM might give wrong results!
[W] No 'player/mem_area_04.bin' found! TRAP_DiscoveryRAM might give wrong results!
[W] No 'player/mem_area_05.bin' found! TRAP_DiscoveryRAM might give wrong results!
[W] No 'player/mem_area_07.bin' found! TRAP_DiscoveryRAM might give wrong results!

dirio49
19th December 2008, 23:24
I just tried to use dumphd-0.6 for the first time with a BD+ disc (What Happens In Vegas) and it just pegs one of my CPU cores (after: "[I] TRAP_LoadContentCode: Loading BDSVM/00001.svm (block 7)") and there doesn't seem to be any disc activity. Is this one of the discs the BDVM Debugger can't handle yet? I did notice this:


Loading BDVM... [W] No 'player/player_executable.bin' found! TRAP_DiscoveryRAM might give wrong results!
[W] No 'player/mem_area_02.bin' found! TRAP_DiscoveryRAM might give wrong results!
[W] No 'player/mem_area_03.bin' found! TRAP_DiscoveryRAM might give wrong results!
[W] No 'player/mem_area_04.bin' found! TRAP_DiscoveryRAM might give wrong results!
[W] No 'player/mem_area_05.bin' found! TRAP_DiscoveryRAM might give wrong results!
[W] No 'player/mem_area_07.bin' found! TRAP_DiscoveryRAM might give wrong results!


those files are found in the zip that containts the debuger

http://uploaded.to/?id=xcco6l

ggking7
20th December 2008, 00:56
I had extracted the .7z archive with '7z e *.7z' instead of '7z x *.7z' so it didn't extract the full paths.

I did it correctly this time and I don't see the same errors, but it still just pegs my CPU with no disc activity after:

[I] TRAP_LoadContentCode: Loading BDSVM/00001.svm (block 7)

I notice this in the output:

Loading BDVM... OK
BDVM 0.1.5
[snip]
BD+ protection : YES
Conversion Table : MISSING

KenD00
20th December 2008, 17:35
BD+ protection : YES
Conversion Table : MISSING


That output is ok, it indicates that you haven't supplied a Conversion Table manually and results in the BDVM beeing executed ;).

If you have full CPU load and don't get any further output most probably the BDVM can't handle your disc. To be sure, use the BDVM Debugger directly, if it behaves the same report back in the BDVM thread about your disc, maybe they can help you there.

:rolleyes:

ggking7
20th December 2008, 18:04
Thanks, I'll investigate the disc.

omikron
22nd December 2008, 09:46
Hi
I just tried to process new BD+ disk and it worked but the main file work fine in few first minutes and then glitches in the picture will appear. It's Planet of Apes - A. Any idea to fix it?

Doom9
22nd December 2008, 13:08
Planet of the Apes is on the list of "advanced" BD+ titles (http://forum.slysoft.com/showthread.php?t=21985) so don't even bother trying it. The authors of the debugger have been less than enthusiastic about the prospect of tackling the new code and seeing as Slysoft is taking quite a while I wouldn't expect any free solution to the problem within the next few months.

loo3aem3ON
22nd December 2008, 14:12
Hi
I just tried to process new BD+ disk and it worked but the main file work fine in few first minutes and then glitches in the picture will appear. It's Planet of Apes - A. Any idea to fix it?
The debugger seems to pass all tests of the content code but the segment keys are wrong (so the repair descriptors are wrong too). It almost certainly means at least one of the system calls used for segment key calculation is incorrectly implemented. Once AnyDVD-HD adds support for these new movies we will start working on this issue. It has been by decision not to compete with SlySoft so we stay behind. If any of the older movies doesn't work properly please report the problem.

ggking7
22nd December 2008, 14:43
loo3aem3ON, I can't get "What Happens in Vegas" to work but it's the first one I've tried. Is running the BDVM Debugger manually the next thing to do?

loo3aem3ON
22nd December 2008, 15:32
I can't get "What Happens in Vegas" to work but it's the first one I've tried. Is running the BDVM Debugger manually the next thing to do?
Yes. Open the resulting conv_tab.bin with KenD00's ConvTableView and see if you get any warnings. If you should get warnings upload the hash_db.bin and the content of the BDSVM directory from the disc please so i can take a look (switch to the other thread please because its then not dumphd related). If you don't get warnings then the conversion table is most likely correct and you probably do something wrong with dumphd.

sl1pkn07
24th December 2008, 14:48
It means your drive refuses to send you the volume id of the disc because the certificate which is used by dumphd/aacskeys has been revoked.

Now you can:
1. get a valid certificate(pub key)/private key pair
2. patch your firmware to bypass authentication
3. obtain the volume id by logging the communication between a licensed software player and your drive (sniffing)
4. use utilities like DumpVID
5. ask somebody who has the same disc, google, ...

I recommend to patch your drive but this option is only a few drives (LG, Plextor,...)


howto in linux?¿

i have a LG GGC-H20L 1.03 OFW and linux. not use windows

ggking7
24th December 2008, 17:10
Use wine.

Doom9
24th December 2008, 17:49
The thread you posted into first contained a lenghty discussion on how to flash your drive on Linux - and, Linux is the posterchild for RTFM so I'm surprised that you come here claiming Linux and don't know the number one rule that applies when asking for help in a Linux community. We're no different with respect to that and even have even formalized the "read first, try, then ask questions" in our forum rules.

sl1pkn07
24th December 2008, 20:05
sorry that this all in perfect English


sorry for all

bazzerr
25th December 2008, 21:17
HI , I am having problems getting DumpHD to load the BDVM debugger . I get the following message from DumpHD :
DumpHD 0.6 by KenD00

Opening Key Data File... OK
Initializing AACS... OK
Loading aacskeys library... OK
aacskeys library 0.3.6 by arnezami, KenD00
Loading BDVM... FAILED
bdvm.vm.BDVM cannot be cast to bdvm.vm.BDVMInterface
Automatic BD+ removal disabled, specify a Conversion Table manually to remove BD+ if necessary

I am using Java Version 6 update 11 , build 1.60_11-b03 and DumpHD works except for this .
All Debugger files re in the DumpHD directory as per the readme and I have also tried putting the Java files all through the subfolders but to no avail .
Any ideas ?

Cheers

Doom9
25th December 2008, 21:48
Did you unpack the official debugger 0.1.5 release into the same directory you unpacked dumphd, including subfolders? can you run the debugger manually (double click on the jar file if you're on Windows)?

KenD00
26th December 2008, 04:06
It looks like (s)he is not using the 0.1.5 release, only this version implements the interface that DumpHD needs. A direct link to the BDVM Debugger 0.1.5 can be found on the first page of this thread.

:rolleyes:

bazzerr
26th December 2008, 06:24
HI ,
I am using debugger 0.1.5 and have it in the same directory as DumpHD ( ie bdvmbg JAR file , sh file and the 3 BIN files are in the DumpHD directory ) .
I can run the debugger file manually and get a conv_tab.bin file to be created into the dumpHD directory but even then it doesn't see the file and doesn't remove the BD+

Cheers ( he is most appreciative of this assistance ) .

bazzerr
26th December 2008, 06:59
Hi KenD00 / Doom9 ,

I went back and deleted my folder and re unpacked everything again and this time it loads everything up correctly .
Cheers for the replies .

teox99
1st January 2009, 14:55
Hi people!
i've to burn a dumped m2ts on BD-R disc (using Nero Linux 3.5) it's works perfect for PC but it can't be read by a normal TV blu-ray player.
My question is, have I to make the foder structure contains the m2ts file (/BDMV/STREAM/) or what? Any suggestion please?!
thanx!

KenD00
14th January 2009, 00:48
This new version decodes the offset field into Repair Descriptor Type and Repair Descriptor Address and checks if the former one is of the valid Type 1 or Type 2.

:rolleyes:

loo3aem3ON
14th January 2009, 13:31
This new version decodes the offset field into Repair Descriptor Type and Repair Descriptor Address and checks if the former one is of the valid Type 1 or Type 2.
Thank you for this very useful tool. Also thanks for the source code! :thanks:

gonwk
27th January 2009, 03:53
Just a Question ... are there any other Download Sites for the programs on Page 1 ... besides RapidShare!?!?

Thanks,

G!:)

KenD00
27th January 2009, 04:33
There are no other "official" download sites, however DumpHD is mirrored on Softpedia. Is there a problem with the downloads? I used to upload the programs on SendSpace too but i am saving this work now because RapidShare has proven to be (more) reliable.

:rolleyes:

gonwk
27th January 2009, 04:46
There are no other "official" download sites, however DumpHD is mirrored on Softpedia. Is there a problem with the downloads? I used to upload the programs on SendSpace too but i am saving this work now because RapidShare has proven to be (more) reliable.

:rolleyes:

Hi KenD00,:)

First of all THANKS for your program. I tried the Free User deal and keep telling me that I was already downloading something which was not true.

Oh ... I was not aware Softpedia has it. Thanks!

Ken ... can you have VideoHelp to host it for you. They have your program except ... only download is Author's Home Page ... which is here Doom9!!!

G! :thanks:

mshilly
5th February 2009, 07:44
First try and had to use dumpvid and aacskeys manually. Worked perfectly. Compared output to file extracted with AnyDVD HD (before trial was over) everything matched perfectly.

Great tool. Ran it in a P4 2.8Ghz and it only used ~80% CPU so it did pretty well. It at least kept up with the LG BD/HD-DVD drive.

teox99
5th February 2009, 21:56
is there any planning to upgrade DumpHD for MKBv 9? i think there are enough movie (about 100)
http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=143491&highlight=MKBv9
with MKBv9... how long we have to wait?! thanx for the relpy.

kkloster21
5th February 2009, 22:41
@teox99:

there is no doubt that it would be worth it to "upgrade" DumpHD to be able to handle MKBv9 discs - this is not the issue. the problem is that we just don't have the ability to decrypt MKBv9 discs**. we don't have a processing key that can get version 9 (or above) media keys. in fact "upgrading" DumpHD would require nothing more than to add a working processing key to the ProcessingDeviceKeysSimple.txt file.

by the way, if anyone has one of those keys just lying around, we could sure use it.

**we don't have the ability to do it in linux using DumpHD or any other open-source software.

teox99
15th February 2009, 11:52
i bought BD movie with MKBv9,
is there a way to get the key hammering the BD with some code? i could use a very powerful workstation...

Adub
15th February 2009, 12:06
Trust me, if it was as simple as "using a powerful workstation", someone with an even more powerful workstation would have done it already.

teox99
18th February 2009, 12:33
hi
it happened a couple of time that using dumpHD-0.6 with mplayer(VDPAU) the system hang up and reboot itself just 5 minutes before the end of the movie.

(this is very very bad!!!) couse i've to break watching the movie! and dump it on h.d. (couse is not possible reach the point dumping on the fly... right?!?)

using mplayer directly on a dumped BD on hard disk it never happen.

i can't report any logs or feedback, sorry.

lchiu7
19th February 2009, 04:07
Advance apologies if this has been asked and answered but I couldn't find an answer after some time reading the various threads

In Windows I am trying to backup my Live Free and Die Hard (US). This apparently is a BD+ protected disc.

To complicate matters my drive has had its key revoked. But I was able to use dumpvid and PowerDVD7 to retrieve Volume ID. Then used aacskeys to find and then insert the Volume ID and Disc ID into the keydb.cfg database

But when I run dumphd (0.6 with the BDVM Debugger in the same directory) I get these errors

DumpHD 0.6 by KenD00

Opening Key Data File... OK
Initializing AACS... OK
Loading aacskeys library... OK
aacskeys library 0.4.0 by arnezami, KenD00
Loading BDVM... OK
BDVM 0.1.5

Initializing source...
Disc type found: Blu-Ray BDMV
Collecting input files...
Source initialized
Identifying disc... OK
DiscID : FBFC7D5019DD4840FDD57E3B32895CE927A1E12B
Searching disc in key database...
Disc found in key database
Disc is BD+ protected and the Volume ID is not present in the key database
Retrieving keys from source...
aacskeys 0.4.0 by arnezami, KenD00

Current path: C:\apps\dumphd

MKBv: 4
Processing key: F190A1E8178D80643494394F8031D9C8
Encrypted C-value: 762E82CE5355137318D9BB3264F755D3
Corresponding uv: 000000A0

Decrypted C-value: 22DD2D7E8003E3F11E2E8F4BBAC228F3
Media key: 22DD2D7E8003E3F11E2E8F4BBAC22853

Encrypted verification data: C5A6A378B7CFE2BD3D39EE4F4898E205
Decr verif data should be: 0123456789ABCDEF
Decrypted verification data: 0123456789ABCDEFD68E9DD33A278642

Drive FW info: 1.004
AACS Version: 01
Number of concurrent AGIDs: 1
Supports BN generation: YES
BN Block Count: 1
Inserted medium AACS protected: YES

AGID: 00

Host Private Key (Hpriv): 4737676058D7029452514F0AB186DC4CCA8C578F
Host certificate (Hcert): 0200005CFFFF0000000C00006E3DEB679B9A16AD
FAA8E30878767BA6EB2A9B415385AD1181B4446C
31E9A5DD2AB808B364FF15885BAC490964318C9B
F8029FCF76F688A54FBDA03F6D9332EF04E5A613
12DA85880A4D9CBB79D8602E
Host Nonce (Hn): 2923BE84E16CD6AE529049F1F1BBE9EBB3A6DB3C

AGID: 00

The given Host Certficate / Private Key has been revoked by your drive.


ERROR: SENDHOSTCHAL: SK: 0x5, ASC: 0x6F, ASCQ: 0x00, errnr: -2


aacskeys ERROR: SENDHOSTCHAL: SK: 0x5, ASC: 0x6F, ASCQ: 0x00, errnr: -2
Warning! Failed retrieving keys from source


Reading this it seems that dumphd found the Disc ID in the key database but could not correlate that with a Volume ID it could pass to the BDVM debugger


The format I have for the BD title in the keydb.cfg database is

FBFC7D5019DD4840FDD57E3B32895CE927A1E12B=Live Free or Die Hard |V|MM/DD/YY| 9862395514619483D28AB9B5C3B4BAE8



Yet if I invoke the BDVM debugger directly and pass in the Volume ID and drive letter it does appear to produce a conv_tab.bin file

Not sure how I can direct dumphd to use that.

Any help or pointers to other threads I might have missed would ben appreciated

Thanks

[EDIT]

I see that dumphd for BD movies has a new key format that I might not be using. I will try that out. Just got confused because I had gotten keys for Cars and Ratatouille (not BD+ protected that I could see) and inserted them into keydb.cfg and dumphd found them fine and processed the titles

[Update]

Guess I should RTFM! Put the three keys into the keydb.cfg in the new format and now dumphd appears to handle the disc with no errors. Haven't ripped the entire disc yet but it looks good so far

lchiu7
19th February 2009, 09:54
Does Dumpvid work with WinDVD9? I ask because I have a drive that has the key revoked but I only have the OEM PDVD7 software that came with the drive and it can only play BD titles, not HD-DVD's?

Looks like WinDVD9 can play HD-DVD's but not sure if dumpvid would work with it

Thanks

KenD00
19th February 2009, 17:30
DumpVID does not require any special software player, it should work with every player. It may be possible that a player detects that it is running and refuses to operate, but i haven't heard of any case this happened.

Another thing i want to correct is that your drive does not have any keys. aacskeys uses keys that have been revoked, not your drive.

:rolleyes:

lchiu7
19th February 2009, 19:22
DumpVID does not require any special software player, it should work with every player. It may be possible that a player detects that it is running and refuses to operate, but i haven't heard of any case this happened.

Another thing i want to correct is that your drive does not have any keys. aacskeys uses keys that have been revoked, not your drive.

:rolleyes:

Thanks for the clarification. Once I was able to patch the drive, I have no further need for dumpvid. I has reservations about patching the drive and thought that using dumpvid and a player would get around it. It seemed to - well for BluRay but I hadn't realised that the OEM PDVD7 BD edition that came with the drive could not play HD-DVD's.

So this key revocation would apply to all drives? Or could you get a brand new drive off the shelf, never actually play a BD or HD-DVD in it so there was no chance for the key to be revoked and aacskeys should work? Or is the act of actually putting a disc in the drive and have it read, enough to have the drive revoke the key?

KenD00
21st February 2009, 06:25
I don't know how many times i have answered this question now, well, i will take it as exercise to optimize my answer.

Basically there are two types of keys with two different revocation schemes and all this in one MKB.

We have the Processing Keys which can be revoked implicit with a new MKB version which just can't be decrypted with the ones we have. This doesn't hurt that much, we can't watch the new movies but still our old ones.

Then there are the Certificates that we need to get some information from the discs (Volume ID) to decrypt its keys (Volume Unique Key). And these certificates can be revoked explicit by putting them on a blacklist. And this list gets updated at least when you try to get this information from the disc, but it may get updated as soon as you put the disc into the drive, this is still unknown (to me :D). And if your Certificate is revoked then you can't playback even your old movies anymore.

So no, you can't avoid revocation, buying a new drive won't help and of course new drives come shipped with an actual blacklist so im pretty sure you won't find an actual drive which still ships with the working MKBv1 blacklist. But you can avoid the effect of explicit revocation by using a patched drive, however this doesn't help you with implicit revocation.

:rolleyes:

lchiu7
22nd February 2009, 02:34
Actually I might be stupid but this is still not 100% clear. But don't worry. For me the outcome is more important than how it works! For me the outcomes is, without having to use AnyDVD, with a patched drive and dumphd (with the aacskeys and BD+ removal integration) I can backup any of my HD-DVD's (no more titles are coming out with new encryption here!) and most of my BD's apart from those which have mkbv9. That is just fine for me. Those I can't backup - I will just bring out the BD to play.

setarip_old
22nd February 2009, 03:08
@lchiu7

Hi!

Although (presently FREEWARE) MakeMKV does not yet deal with the BluRay BD+ protection mechanism the authors have stated that it is able to deal with the Media Key Block 9 (MKBv9) in AACS technology.

After ripping (Does NOT need AnyDVD HD) and creating an MKV, you can, with very little effort, convert it to a "movie-only" BluRay by briefly processing it in "tsMUXER"...

lchiu7
22nd February 2009, 11:15
@lchiu7

Hi!

Although (presently FREEWARE) MakeMKV does not yet deal with the BluRay BD+ protection mechanism the authors have stated that it is able to deal with the Media Key Block 9 (MKBv9) in AACS technology.

After ripping (Does NOT need AnyDVD HD) and creating an MKV, you can, with very little effort, convert it to a "movie-only" BluRay by briefly processing it in "tsMUXER"...

What about a title that has BD+ and MKBv9. Are you then stuck and have to continue play the original disc instead of a backup!?

ggking7
22nd February 2009, 15:04
MakeMKV doesn't decrypt though right? It transcodes an MKBv9 video to an MKBv9 video?

setarip_old
22nd February 2009, 20:02
@ggking7

Hi!MakeMKV doesn't decrypt though right?WRONG!

As I said in my previous post, after using MakeMKV to both "rip" (MakeMKV does NOT need AnyDVD HD) and create an MKV...

"Rip", as in "decrypt"...

setarip_old
22nd February 2009, 20:09
@lchiu7

Hi!What about a title that has BD+ and MKBv9.To reiterate, MakeMKV presently cannot process ANY BluRay discs containing BD+ - whether or not they also contain MKBv9.

On the other hand, the publisher of MakeMKV claims that it CAN presently process BluRay discs that contain MKBv9 - as long as they DO NOT also contain BD+...

ggking7
23rd February 2009, 17:21
Wow, isn't that really big news? MakeMKV doesn't seem to work in Linux via wine unfortunately.

may24
24th February 2009, 00:42
Hi, I run into a problem and neither google nor the forum search turned out anything. Can you help me out:

DumpHD 0.6 by KenD00

Opening Key Data File... OK
Initializing AACS... OK
Loading aacskeys library... OK
aacskeys library 0.4.0 by arnezami, KenD00
Loading BDVM... OK
BDVM 0.1.5

Initializing source...
Disc type found: Blu-Ray BDMV
Collecting input files...
Source initialized
Identifying disc... OK
DiscID : F3604D1DDFB5A852566BAD37F14814145119DAE1
Searching disc in key database...
Disc not found in key database
Retrieving keys from source...
aacskeys 0.4.0 by arnezami, KenD00

Current path: /root/work/dumphd-0.6

MKBv: 3
Processing key: 455FE10422CA29C4933F95052B792AB2
Encrypted C-value: 0E8F739AFACD3129192B6CBC6BE58A86
Corresponding uv: 00000049

Decrypted C-value: E954DA0B1FF1F2F8AD514CA6B5A02541
Media key: E954DA0B1FF1F2F8AD514CA6B5A02508

Encrypted verification data: FAFBB2D347DA8F455889A3ADC68BDF0F
Decr verif data should be: 0123456789ABCDEF
Decrypted verification data: 0123456789ABCDEFABD2BE60E34D8FA7

Drive FW info: 4109
AACS Version: 01
Number of concurrent AGIDs: 1
Supports BN generation: NO
BN Block Count: 0
Inserted medium AACS protected: YES

AGID: 00

Host Private Key (Hpriv): 4737676058D7029452514F0AB186DC4CCA8C578F
Host certificate (Hcert): 0200005CFFFF0000000C00006E3DEB679B9A16AD
FAA8E30878767BA6EB2A9B415385AD1181B4446C
31E9A5DD2AB808B364FF15885BAC490964318C9B
F8029FCF76F688A54FBDA03F6D9332EF04E5A613
12DA85880A4D9CBB79D8602E
Host Nonce (Hn): 2923BE84E16CD6AE529049F1F1BBE9EBB3A6DB3C

AGID: 00

Drive certificate (Dcert): ########################################
########################################
########################################
########################################
########################
Drive Nonce (Dn): ########################################

Drive key point (Dv): ########################################
########################################
Drive key signature (Dsig): ########################################
########################################

Host key (Hk): 5613E7F89B11D9CAA27B610A1096332BEED86BC4
Host key point (Hv): 8A60C80BD60C23605FBE90B27BF96B2DB38195C1
801F54EB29E0F6EC57AC2B9168E88B2D56977508
Host key signature (Hsig): ########################################
########################################

Problem with verifying the drive signature.


ERROR: AACSVERYIFDRIVE, errnr: -1


aacskeys ERROR: AACSVERYIFDRIVE, errnr: -1
Failed retrieving keys from source

Actually running Yellowdog 6.1 on PPC-Core Playstation 3
IBM PPC Java 1.6.0

880
24th February 2009, 03:55
AACSKeys failed. I think it is not supported on PS3 Linux. So you have to find out the keys another way: either look in the Volume Unique Keys thread for your movie, or get a PC.