Log in

View Full Version : high quality = not easy to playback


Viechal
21st December 2006, 10:36
Hey as i already said i am making gamemovies for Enemy Territory and i want to get an amazing quality.
I encode the videos with h264 as mp4.

Well everyone releases the movies in a resolution of 800*500 or similar...
The quality is basicly not bad in this resolution but i have already started to work on rendering it with 1280*800.
Well the quality was imho amazing but there still were some problems.
On lower PCs the movie got lags and thats ****.

Is there anything that i can make differenty without a suffering quality?

What i am doing: recording a scene with 120 fps in a res of 1440*900. then i stick the frames together with virtual dub and change the framerate to 30.
In Vegas I change the playback speed to 4 and then render it out with the same resolution.
Finally i encode it with my makemp4batchfile.

Is there anything that i can improve or change to make it easier to view?

Thx a lot
Mfg

check
21st December 2006, 11:21
h264 is a higher quality codec, which requires a higher speed decoder to decode it in real time. If you are not already using coreavc, I'd recommend that, as it has a ~40% boost in decoding performance compared to ffdshow (although it seems this will be cut to 20% soon).

Pookie
22nd December 2006, 04:05
Another Vote for CoreAVC

check - what do you mean by 40%-20% boost difference? Is CoreAVC getting slower or is ffdshow getting faster ?

check
22nd December 2006, 09:13
the latter; coreavc has had no significant speed improvments over its entire lifetime, whereas ffmpeg (and therefore ffdshow) is slowly improving.

Viechal
25th December 2006, 14:57
do you know is it possible that coreavc will be free in the future?
because if it would be i could release my vids with an installer of it...

Pookie
26th December 2006, 07:11
Unlikely CoreAVC will ever be free. Another option is to try Instant Player, which is a version of mplayer that packages your file and player into a single .EXE

http://mulder.brhack.net/public/downloads/InstantPlayer.2006-11-10.exe

Viechal
28th December 2006, 18:44
thanks man

LockoNH
2nd January 2007, 07:57
Going with 24fps or 25fps helps a bit too, smaller file, slightly less taxing. Videogames can be tough in that they are a constantly changing picture, very little static view, constant panning and whipping around.