Didée. Can I ask you for a denoiser ?

[Jeremy Duncan]

Didée. Can I ask you for a denoiser ?
I would like a denoiser to run in real time that denoises the spatial and temporal noise.
It needs to be fast since it would be used in realtime.

What I'm thinking is maybe a mix of Spresso and Fluxsmooth, or something like that.

I'm hoping that you can make something that's Fast.
I'm using Spresso and Fluxsmooth now in the guides I make and it's kinda slow. Denoises real nice though.

[Didée]

Browsing through your guides gives me headaches. Endless meters of text, sometimes interrupted by endless meters of screenshots ... and all those meters & meters contain dozens & dozens of different setups. I won't even try to figure what is what.

I found several code segments where you're using either FluxSmooth or SPresso.
The only one I stumbled about, where you're using both, is this:

a = last
b = a.FluxSmoothT(11)
SeeSaw(a, b, NRlimit=2, NRlimit2=1, Sstr=1.4, Slimit=7, Spower=2, Sdamplo=8, SdampHi=10, Szp=10, bias=1, sootheT=30)
SPresso(limit=2, limitC=2, bias=76, biasC=76, RGmode=4, RGmodeC=4)

In this case, nothing can be done: FluxSmooth is applied before & used in SeeSaw, SPresso only comes after that whole. No combination possible.

If there is a particular combination of FluxSmooth & SPresso that you're aiming at, post it here.
However: generally, FluxSmooth is as fast as it can be, as is SPresso. Any combination of both will require additional script code to actually do the combination, and therefore won't be any faster, but will be even slower instead. :)

Frankly, I don't see you in need of faster filters, but rather in need for some good medicine against

"realtimeprocessing-itis" ...

:)

[Jeremy Duncan]

Browsing through your guides gives me headaches. Endless meters of text, sometimes interrupted by endless meters of screenshots ... and all those meters & meters contain dozens & dozens of different setups. I won't even try to figure what is what.

I found several code segments where you're using either FluxSmooth or SPresso.
The only one I stumbled about, where you're using both, is this:

a = last
b = a.FluxSmoothT(11)
SeeSaw(a, b, NRlimit=2, NRlimit2=1, Sstr=1.4, Slimit=7, Spower=2, Sdamplo=8, SdampHi=10, Szp=10, bias=1, sootheT=30)
SPresso(limit=2, limitC=2, bias=76, biasC=76, RGmode=4, RGmodeC=4)

In this case, nothing can be done: FluxSmooth is applied before & used in SeeSaw, SPresso only comes after that whole. No combination possible.

If there is a particular combination of FluxSmooth & SPresso that you're aiming at, post it here.
However: generally, FluxSmooth is as fast as it can be, as is SPresso. Any combination of both will require additional script code to actually do the combination, and therefore won't be any faster, but will be even slower instead. :)

Frankly, I don't see you in need of faster filters, but rather in need for some good medicine against

"realtimeprocessing-itis" ...

:)

Well said, Didée. Thank you. :)

[Adub]

Personally I love the real time stuff. If I can watch movies just that much sharper, without any frame drops, than I am golden.