Log in

View Full Version : Feature Reencoding?


rack04
6th December 2006, 13:58
Can anyone explain why DVD Rebuilder thinks that the feature does not required reencoding? VTS_01 is 7,227MBytes and would required reencoding to fit on a DVD-5. Thanks.

[06:49:21] One Click encoding activated...
-----------------
[06:49:22] Phase I, PREPARATION started.
- DVD-RB v1.20.4
- AVISYNTH 2.5.6.0
- ProCoder selected.
- "Movie and Menus Only" mode is enabled.
- Source: PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN
- VTS_01: 3,631,076 sectors.
-- Scanning and writing .D2V & .AVS files
-- Processed 216,789 frames.
-- Building .AVS and .ECL files
- VTS_02: 2,056 sectors.
-- Scanning and writing .D2V & .AVS files
-- Processed 226 frames.
-- Building .AVS and .ECL files
- VTS_03: 164,276 sectors.
-- Scanning and writing .D2V & .AVS files
-- Processed 15,540 frames.
-- Building .AVS and .ECL files
- VTS_04: 54,919 sectors.
-- Scanning and writing .D2V & .AVS files
-- Processed 6,925 frames.
-- Building .AVS and .ECL files
- VTS_05: 16,060 sectors.
-- Scanning and writing .D2V & .AVS files
-- Processed 1,581 frames.
-- Building .AVS and .ECL files
- VTS_06: 8,591 sectors.
-- Scanning and writing .D2V & .AVS files
-- Processed 1,060 frames.
-- Building .AVS and .ECL files
- Reduction Level for DVD-5: 60.4%
- Overall Bitrate : 3,788/3,030Kbs
- Space for Video : 3,735,662KB
- Blanking all EXTRA Segments
-- Feature before/after: 3,139 / 3,420 Kbs
-- FEATURE does not require reencoding.
[06:53:58] Phase I, PREPARATION completed in 4 minutes.

jdobbs
6th December 2006, 14:38
Certainly odd -- and the message is clearly shown in error, because if you run the ENCODE phase it still calls the encoder to make it fit... I'll check it out and see what's up.

[Edit] Yep. I found it. There's an error in the "Extra Blanking" routine that sets a flag incorrectly when any individual segment falls into the "no need to reencode" category. It, in fact, should only be set if that were true for ALL THE SEGMENTS in the feature. It shouldn't hurt anything and will work ok -- it's just reporting incorrectly. I'll fix it for the next release.

rack04
6th December 2006, 14:59
Thank your very much for you time. I pretty much knew everything was being encoded correctly but I figured I'd bring it to your attention.