View Full Version : New x264 FAQs added. If you have any suggestions, post them here.
Sharktooth
10th October 2006, 01:55
Link: http://forum.doom9.org/showpost.php?p=696689&postcount=5
akupenguin
10th October 2006, 02:19
Now might be the time to remove "interlacing" from the list of unsupported features.
typos: (normally I wouldn't bother, but since it's a sticky...)
...Are yours offcial builds...
...Also i use my own compiler optimizations to get sligthly better encoding performances...
...If you want more speed do not enable all the bells and wisthles and keep settings to a sane level...
...MeGUI is no longer included in my builds. Please unistall x264, get and install latest...
...VFW support was removed because it was no longer mantained and because...
...Do x264 or your builds support multiprocessor systems os multicore CPUs...
...GUIs that support x264 come with a bunce of presets...
Sharktooth
10th October 2006, 02:22
thanks. going to correct the spelling, etc right now.
EDIT: Done.
OT: Is there any opera plugin/widget for spell checking? --- never mind... found it :) Opera supports Aspell...
Kurtnoise
10th October 2006, 06:20
Q22: Are there any other OpenSource h.264 encoders other than x264?
A: As far as i know, no.
What about :
JM Reference Encoder : http://iphome.hhi.de/suehring/tml/
DM-QCif-Codec : http://sourceforge.net/projects/dm-qcif-codc
Hdot264 : http://sourceforge.net/projects/hdot264
T264 : http://sourceforge.net/projects/t264 (command line and DShow encoder)
ChronoCross
10th October 2006, 06:32
Can you really count things that aren't being developed? Some of their CVS's haven't changed in quite some time. One is basline only in pure C.
It would be odd to put things that are crippleware other than the JM Reference encoder.
Kurtnoise
10th October 2006, 06:39
hdot264 seems to be not developped anymore indeed but by *definition* an open-source project is not dead... :)
Plus, it's just a FAQ.
akupenguin
10th October 2006, 07:14
Open-source projects can be just as dead as anything else. They just have more of a chance to get resurrected later, if and only if someone is sufficiently interested.
hdot264 is not only not developed anymore, it's... a vfw frontend for jm and xvid?
afaict, dm-qcif hasn't released any source code, despite being gpl'ed. And it's baseline and C only.
t264 is a fork of some early version of x264, and hasn't been updated in 16 months.
Sharktooth
10th October 2006, 12:29
I knew those projects. The fact is they're pretty dead and incomplete (JM apart).
The JM reference encoder is just what the name says... a reference encoder. It's so slow it's not good for everyday encoding.
Kurtnoise
10th October 2006, 13:13
dead or alive...Whatever, this is the wrong discussion imo.
btw, I suppose that you won't mention the FFmpeg h.264 compressor also even if it's only available via the ML...
Sharktooth
10th October 2006, 13:17
If it's not updated or easily accessible even for lazy windows users i wont mention it... otherwise my mailbox will get instantly filled with questions...
EDIT: Reworded Q22. It now looks like this:
Q22: Are there any other usable OpenSource h.264 encoders other than x264?
A: Yes and no. There are other OSS h.264 encoders but their development is discontinued or incomplete. However the Xvid dev team is working on Xvid AVC but they didn't release any code yet.
Kurtnoise
10th October 2006, 15:31
Ok...sounds better. :)
Manao
10th October 2006, 16:06
I don't think XviD AVC source code will ever be released.
Sharktooth
10th October 2006, 17:32
IIRC they said it will be OSS, but things may have changed.
The lack of official statements is not helping though...
Manao
10th October 2006, 19:50
If it was going to be OSS, source code would have been released when they said it would. That was 8 months ago. Anyway, all that is pure supposition, since, as you said, there were no official statements. Which, incidentally, tends to confirm my point...
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.