bkman
19th August 2006, 05:20
Ok, this idea may be a bit out there, so don't be too harsh in shooting it down...
So, we all know that DVD's are interlaced in all sorts of funny ways, and yet the visual result is not usually distracting on the most basic of intended output devices: the 480i (or 576i) CRT TV. Now why is that? As far as I know this is due to the particular characteristic of CRT displays, and in particular to how scanlines fade gradually even while the next set is drawn, leading to a kind of interpolation effect for the viewer.
Now this obviously doesn't work on progressive displays, which leads to all the problems with deinterlacing, etc. The question I am posing however, is why not simulate this CRT fadeoff effect during realtime playback on progressive diplays by dimming odd and even field pixels in the time after they are first drawn? Like give each pixel a "life" expectation, and fade them off upto that point at a higher-than-original framerate. Would such a system not nullify the need for many and sundry deinterlacing methods?
Thoughts, please.
So, we all know that DVD's are interlaced in all sorts of funny ways, and yet the visual result is not usually distracting on the most basic of intended output devices: the 480i (or 576i) CRT TV. Now why is that? As far as I know this is due to the particular characteristic of CRT displays, and in particular to how scanlines fade gradually even while the next set is drawn, leading to a kind of interpolation effect for the viewer.
Now this obviously doesn't work on progressive displays, which leads to all the problems with deinterlacing, etc. The question I am posing however, is why not simulate this CRT fadeoff effect during realtime playback on progressive diplays by dimming odd and even field pixels in the time after they are first drawn? Like give each pixel a "life" expectation, and fade them off upto that point at a higher-than-original framerate. Would such a system not nullify the need for many and sundry deinterlacing methods?
Thoughts, please.