View Full Version : whats better limitedsharpen or limitedsharpen faster ?
jamieuk
17th August 2006, 21:36
Hi just wondering which will give better results, my HTPC is top the range so can run any type of filters.
thanks
unskinnyboy
17th August 2006, 21:47
Results are the same, bit-to-bit. LimitedSharpenFaster, as the name suggests is just faster. It is a mod of the original LimitedSharpen by mg262, to utilize MaskTools 2.0.
jamieuk
17th August 2006, 21:57
is limitedsharpen still at this moment the best sharpening filter or has there been a new Release of some other filter ?
shaolin95
18th August 2006, 05:44
Is a toss up between LSF and Seesaw IMHO.
Terka
18th August 2006, 08:56
which is faster LSF or Seesaw ?
foxyshadis
18th August 2006, 09:20
The supersampling controls the speed entirely. LSF needs a minimum of 1.1 for non-aliased edges (1.2+ is better), SeeSaw gets by fine with 1.0 with good video, although artifacty video looks better with 1.2+ or simply lsf.
Also, amused by this:
my HTPC is top the range so can run any type of filters.
In that case, feeding seesaw with mvdegrain and a light lremovedust will do nicely.
jamieuk
18th August 2006, 14:52
The supersampling controls the speed entirely. LSF needs a minimum of 1.1 for non-aliased edges (1.2+ is better), SeeSaw gets by fine with 1.0 with good video, although artifacty video looks better with 1.2+ or simply lsf.
Also, amused by this:
In that case, feeding seesaw with mvdegrain and a light lremovedust will do nicely.
thanks for help mate.. If you dont mind me asking and if you do upscale DVD`s your self what are your full settings ?
Wilbert
18th August 2006, 21:43
I cleaned up this thread and handed out a strike for rule 4. Now all of you behave yourself and use the report button if necessary.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.