View Full Version : meGUI DVD Ripping Guide
check
17th June 2006, 15:38
Hi all, I've been doing a bit of work on a meGUI tutorial for users which is located here: http://mewiki.project357.com. It's still very much in development, but all feedback and suggestions are welcome (even those that involve me rewriting everything :p).
Especially I'm interested in feedback about the direction people would like to see this go in. Would a huge detailed guide be good, or something simple which resizes to 640x___ and includes stereo mp3 just to serve as a primer be a better starting point?
:thanks:
buzzqw
17th June 2006, 16:36
not bad... not bad !
for newby i think is preferable a guide for the "1 Click Encoding" and not how to write an AVS :p
but a good compendium of all possibility can help always
BHH
berrinam
17th June 2006, 22:13
Great work so far!
DGIndex can be done by MeGUI, I don't see why not
As buzzqw said, why not use the One Click Encoder?
Failing that, at least use AutoEncode -- it'll join the last three steps into one.
There's no need to manually input the info from the d2v into the AviSynth script creator -- MeGUI does that for you
You say follow the instructions in blue for x264, but they're in green
There's not really a need to put useless track names like you did in the Adaptive mux window -- you might as well leave it blank.
check
18th June 2006, 05:07
Thanks for the feedback.
For the one click encoder, I had considered using it, but decided against it, as it gives the user no knowledge to expand, everything is effectively 'hidden'. Also, I would have to make up my own 1-clicks, which would have taken real work :p. It's probably a good idea to do a quick writeup of how to use 1-click / autoencode though, I'll try to add it soon
The only real problem I had with not using the meGUI d2v creator was that there is no progress bar and it didn't tell you the info I thought you needed. Will rewrite this too now - progress bar is reasonably unneccesary.
I'll implement the other changes too.
brumfondl
18th June 2006, 07:54
Thanks for the guide, Check. I found it very useful. I was trying to encode 'The Jacket' but found that using the One click encoder I was getting a file that was the right size but had a black bar at the top and the equivalent sized chunk missing off the bottom but your full instructions helped me get around the problem.
Having done a rip out in full I now know a little bit more about what I am doing so again thanks, and thanks to the crew who have gone to all the effort of making MeGui a great program :)
brumfondl
jellysandwich
18th June 2006, 08:06
Questions:
ND AAC: Nero AAC encoder. AAC is probably the highest quality format available for stereo files. Use adaptive bitrate.
-Adaptive = ABR? If so, why do you prefer it over VBR?
-Why do you recommend using q=3.0 for Vorbis but don't recommend any particular bitrate settings for AAC/MP3?
-Why do you use directshowsource("*.ac3",video=false) instead of just loading the ac3 directly into MeGUI's input?
Comments:
mkvtoolnix: Install this into "C:\Program Files\megui\tools\mkvmerge" and create a shortcut to mmg.exe
-No need to mention this on the first page; adaptive muxer and autoupdate features take care of it.
-You describe Xvid encoding but don't include it in your setup page.
-Anamorphic encoding -> Briefly compare overcrop and non-mod16.
js
check
18th June 2006, 09:10
brumfondl, thanks for the feedback :)
jellysandwich, I ended up writing in recommendations to use ABR for all formats (bar vorbis of course) because it will hopefully be easier to understand this way. I'll write a rationale for this... sometime in the future.
I implemented the rest of your suggestions, apart from the xvid setup thing. xvidencraw is part of the meGUI autoupdate package, so I don't need to include it there, or am I missing something?
PS, i'm thinking of migrating to a wiki, can people think of any problems from the end-user's perspective?
berrinam
18th June 2006, 10:08
A wiki would be great..... I asked Richard Berg to set up one on http://megui.org , but it seems that he didn't finish. I think, if possible, it would be better to use an "official" wiki set up at megui.org, because people would trust it better, and it would also help to group the efforts. I'll talk to Richard Berg about setting it up again if there is some interest in it.
check
18th June 2006, 10:38
Well, I decided to take the plunge, and will try to migrate what I have into http://www.project357.com/meGUIwiki tonight. Importing and exporting wiki pages is dead simple, so if that wiki is ever set up, I'll see if he'll take the walkthrough. At least I can dump frontpage now :D
Edit: Wiki finished! Old site dead and buried
danpos
20th June 2006, 00:24
@check
What did happen with new tutorial on Wiki? I went there and didn't see nothing !!!
check
20th June 2006, 02:24
Sorry, I had been messing around with the mediawiki configuration and accidentally left it in a broken state - it should be fixed now.
berrinam
20th June 2006, 06:19
As far as I know, the name is MeGUI, not meGUI. I am aware that meGUI is on the sf project, but MeGUI is everywhere else? What shall we stick with, because once it starts getting in the documentation, it'll probably become semi-permanent.
I think MeGUI.
berrinam
20th June 2006, 08:17
I've made a few changes around the guide (just minor wording changes), and I've added a new 'reference' section, which is aimed to explain every option in MeGUI. Basically, I hope that someone else can do the majority of it, but I can fill in the missing bits, etc.
I think that partially answers this question: Especially I'm interested in feedback about the direction people would like to see this go in. Would a huge detailed guide be good, or something simple which resizes to 640x___ and includes stereo mp3 just to serve as a primer be a better starting point?
My answer is that both are necessary, so we can introduce people to MeGUI and then tell them all the details.
check
20th June 2006, 10:58
Yep, I've started work on this section now. A lot of red links are appearing, so anyone willing to help (and to fill in what I don't know) would be much appreciated :).
It's getting bigger!
berrinam
20th June 2006, 12:01
Wow, great work -- you've certainly done a lot of work.
Just don't forget that it's impossible to do everything ourselves -- there are many other valuable sites we should link to often -- Wikipedia, and avisynth.org (especially the new wiki there -- www.avisynth.org/mediawiki/wiki )
check
20th June 2006, 12:11
Never fear, I have no intention of writing up overly extraneous information, and core information will come first.
I pilfered the computer file page from another wiki (which you can see in the page history) which meant I didn't need to do too much work (although I did do a fair bit of work on it there too :p). I'm trying to get the basics up during my time off before I go on a weeks holiday this saturday.
berrinam
20th June 2006, 13:37
Is there any way to add InterWiki support so that we can use [[wikipedia:AviSynth]]-type links?
check
20th June 2006, 14:01
Should be easy enough to import wikipedia's interwiki linkset looking at this page: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Interwiki_links . Just poking around my webpanel now to see how to do this.
jellysandwich
20th June 2006, 17:25
What about a short subtitle guide?
js
berrinam
21st June 2006, 08:07
What's happened to the wiki? I can't access it -- server timeouts :(
check
21st June 2006, 09:45
http://mewiki.project357.com works for me.
berrinam
21st June 2006, 09:51
Hmpf..... it does for me too:o .... maybe you could update your link in the first post?
check
21st June 2006, 10:03
You mean the link that also works? :D I'll rewrite the first post / create a new thread soon, it's already obsolete.
TwoToad
24th June 2006, 15:56
Check, I just wanted to say thanks for that guide... It has helped me tremendously!!!
(and thanks megui team for the auto update =)
Adub
27th June 2006, 23:21
In the settings reference window in the wiki, there is an option described as safe profile alteration. It says that there are bugs still.
0.2.3.2176
Commit by berrinam:
- Add '-threads' option to xvid config
- Fix 'safe profile alteration' feature. Does anyone actually need this?
Can this be updated? I think I know what it does judging by the name, but I am not positive or I would change it myself.
berrinam
28th June 2006, 06:51
I believe I 'fixed' it. But it is a clumsy system and I still don't recommend it. A better approach would be to put a readonly checkbox on the profiles, but again, that's only necessary if people are clumsy enough to alter the wrong profile. Feel free to update that, since it is indeed now fixed.
If you're interested in doing some other stuff on the site, then go ahead. I've done most of the details already (as in the details which may not be completely obvious). I'm happy to read what you write and fix any mistakes/add other info. One thing I started, but don't really have a firm plan with is rewriting my MeGUI Guide sticky on the Wiki. I made an image which could be useful, but it isn't particularly high-quality. If you're any good with images, then feel free to put a better version on the wiki in a new page.
http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/37/creation6zn.th.gif (http://img521.imageshack.us/my.php?image=creation6zn.gif)
check
30th June 2006, 13:45
The guide is pretty goood, but it's convoluted and the topics are all over the shop. The headings I think we can save and move to guides/ FAQ are Using AutoEncode /1Click & AVC Hardware (iPod, etc) and AVC Levels .
I'll get back to writing some stuff on the wiki tomorrow - I have a few ideas to put up on there.
Finally, a request: can people start just sticking questions onto the FAQ page? I've not been reading the general questions thread long enough to know some of the common questions - anyone who wants to add some feel free too. I'll work on the organisation of it once I have an idea of the sort of question that will go there.
berrinam
9th July 2006, 07:11
(I would have posted this in the MeGUI Guide discussion thread, but I can't find it.)
Does anyone see the point in keeping the MeGUI Guide as a sticky in this forum any more? The MeGUI wiki now has definitely superseded the guide, and all the relevant stuff in the guide has been put on the wiki already. I've made a backup of the Guide already, and also dumped it on the wiki, so the good bits can be saved, but what do people think? Get rid of the sticky?
foxyshadis
9th July 2006, 09:20
Only if a link is added to MeGUI (Help->Online Help?). Otherwise no one will ever find the wiki, without stumbling onto it or posting and being told "check the wiki".
check
9th July 2006, 09:47
yep, the next step for the MeGUI wiki is to get it into the public eye a little better. A nicer domain name would be useful (would MeGUIwiki (or something).project357.com be better? MeGUI.com of course would be even nicer).
Once the wiki is being used as the prime source of information hopefully we'll have more people checking it (and probably spam will start appearing soon too :p).
berrinam
9th July 2006, 13:12
yep, the next step for the MeGUI wiki is to get it into the public eye a little better. A nicer domain name would be useful (would MeGUIwiki (or something).project357.com be better? MeGUI.com of course would be even nicer).
Once the wiki is being used as the prime source of information hopefully we'll have more people checking it (and probably spam will start appearing soon too :p).
Richard Berg has already registered and set up hosting on MeGUI.org, which is in fact what is used for AutoUpdate. He even started setting up MediaWiki on it, but it is incomplete and doesn't work. I tried to contact him about it when you started the wiki, but he seems to be away at the moment. When he replies, though, megui.org would certainly be ideal, I think.
berrinam
10th July 2006, 01:15
What is the aim of the Basic Guide on the wiki? I know it came first, but it seems that a lot of it would do better/is already in the options reference. In particular, the section on AviSynth creation.
Also, in my opinion, the guide takes the long way around, when encoding videos. AutoEncoding should suit almost everyone's needs, and sometimes One Click encoding is also possible. While it is good to explain how the manual features work, it should not be recommended by the guide IMHO, but instead explained in some kind of reference, like the options reference.
I certainly agree that a guide of some sort is very important, though. Any thoughts?
check
10th July 2006, 04:46
Don't worry, I won't take offense if you think something should be remade or scrapped (the video file primer was originally a massive document I and some others wrote, but I gave it a little 'corrective surgery' and cut out huge swathes of it when we realised it was getting overly large. It still is a bit pudgy imo) :p.
The basic guide was originally written as a standalone guide, so parts of it are definately useless/redudant/in the wrong location/etc now. For instance, the entire page on installing and configuring the required programs should be part of the main namespace (ie, not part of the guide but the main wiki). I'll try to do this rearranging today, but if it's not done within 24hrs, it's fair game for others to have a go at :D. If we cut out the generic instructions, I think it stands reasonably well by itself, especially if we can complement the manual encoding instructions with Autoencode and the whole thing with a 1click guide too.
The problem with autoencode and 1click is that there are no profiles for anything bar video at the moment, and the people that these two modes are aimed at don't want to have to work out their own. Once the profiles start appearing these two modes will become especially useful, but until then they are largely interesting trinkets for the technologically minded.
In short:
o if time is spent on the guide making it more of a part of the wiki and not as standalone as it is, it should be fine with that. the basic guide does not need to be the only guide, the more guides for different ways to do things the better (think Perl ;))
o the video encoding section can be complemented with a version for autoencode
o oneclick needs 'official' profiles before any sort of guide will be worth writing, but a guide for that too will be nice and easy.
Taxidermista
3rd September 2006, 23:34
About the iPod convertion guide/Video encoding, included in the wiki, I think the resolution issue is not clear.
The iPod resolution constraint is total pixels, not max. resolutions:
h.264 -> 320x240 = 76800 pixels
So these resolutions are valid for h.264 encoding:
320x240 -> 1.33:1 video (4:3)
368x208 -> 1.85:1 video (16:9)
416x176 -> 2.35:1 video
With mpeg4 ASP:
mpeg4 ASP -> 480x480 = 230400 pixels
So these resolutions are valid for mpeg4 ASP encoding:
544x416 -> 1.33:1 video (4:3)
624x352 -> 1.85:1 video (16:9)
720x304 -> 2.35:1 video
Of course those "high resolutions" encodings are interesting for the iPod TV-OUT.
So you can go above the 320x240 and 480x480 resolutions.
check
4th September 2006, 12:39
Thanks for the tips. Out of interest, do you know the native resolution of the ipod screen? Also, any additional feedback on the encoding options in use, in particular the xvid settings?
~bT~
4th September 2006, 12:48
Thanks for the tips. Out of interest, do you know the native resolution of the ipod screen?I believe it is 320x192. Well thats what most of the vids I have are.
Taxidermista
4th September 2006, 12:54
Thanks for the tips. Out of interest, do you know the native resolution of the ipod screen? Also, any additional feedback on the encoding options in use, in particular the xvid settings?
The native resolution is 320x240. About the options, nothing in particular.
Adub
6th September 2006, 02:04
Oh okay. I think I will steal this from you.
Adub
6th September 2006, 02:07
Neeeeeveeerrr mind. I see that it has already been done. Thanks.
Edit:Actually it looks like somethings were missed. I will clean them up.
check
6th September 2006, 11:07
uh oh - you edited the old wiki :(
I changed the site address and still haven't killed off the old one yet :P New address is http://mewiki.project357.com
AjnabiZ
6th September 2006, 12:23
Hi
Can anyone explain to me this part from the Guide
To encode in x264:
On the third page (RC & ME):
Set keyframe interval to ten times your framerate (which you got from DGIndex).
I still did not understand as how to get the framerate from DGIndex. and how to multipy etc.
Sharktooth
6th September 2006, 12:31
x264 Config -> RC & ME -> Keyframe Interval: 250 for PAL 300 for NTSC (the rule of thumb is source framerate * 10).
AjnabiZ
6th September 2006, 15:04
x264 Config -> RC & ME -> Keyframe Interval: 250 for PAL 300 for NTSC (the rule of thumb is source framerate * 10).
Thank you very much for the explanation, i did not change the default setting, it was at 250 since it is Pal.
I think this should be explained a bit in the Guide.
Sharktooth
6th September 2006, 16:11
well it has not so much importance.
even if you set it at 300 the rate control will almost always place a keyframe before hitting the max interval.
~bT~
7th September 2006, 13:09
Can someone provide more info on the 2 setting marked in the image below please?
Thanx.
http://img97.imageshack.us/img97/7179/bilderman20060907125946pa1.png
check
7th September 2006, 13:41
http://mewiki.project357.com/Glossary#Analysis_Pass
For a pre-render job - I'm not sure sorry. I think I used to know, but I've forgotten :P
~bT~
7th September 2006, 14:09
http://mewiki.project357.com/Glossary#Analysis_Pass
For a pre-render job - I'm not sure sorry. I think I used to know, but I've forgotten :PWhat i want to know is when would I use this analysis pass? I normally do 2 pass automated rip. If I did an analysis pass would that make my 1st pass quicker?
At the moment, my 1st pass is taking the same time as my 2nd pass. :confused:
Sharktooth
7th September 2006, 15:00
The pre-rendering job does a lossless compression with huffyuv.
It's usefull when you have heavy avisynth scripts and you plan to use multiple passes for encoding, so the filtering is done only once.
~bT~
7th September 2006, 15:26
The pre-rendering job does a lossless compression with huffyuv.
It's usefull when you have heavy avisynth scripts and you plan to use multiple passes for encoding, so the filtering is done only once.This sounds good. So is this the right way to do it?
Keep the pre-rendering job ticked. Have automated 2 pass selected and the just press enqueue? Or am I wrong? Ive noticed it adds 3 jobs to the queue that way.
Sharktooth
7th September 2006, 18:25
Yes, but as i said it's usefull only if the avisynth script is "heavy" enough to slow down the encoding process.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.