redfordxx
31st May 2006, 18:46
I guess this should be same, only the latter is faster:
v2=v1.mt_edge("0 0 0 1 -1 1 0 0 0 1",0,255,0,255,y=3,u=3,v=3)
v2=v1.mt_convolution(horizontal="1 -1 1",vertical="1",total=1.0,y=3,u=3,v=3)
Far from it (at least on my comp;))
Am I missing something, have broken comp, or bug?
(not first time I have similar problem with convolution)
v2=v1.mt_edge("0 0 0 1 -1 1 0 0 0 1",0,255,0,255,y=3,u=3,v=3)
v2=v1.mt_convolution(horizontal="1 -1 1",vertical="1",total=1.0,y=3,u=3,v=3)
Far from it (at least on my comp;))
Am I missing something, have broken comp, or bug?
(not first time I have similar problem with convolution)