Log in

View Full Version : MSU MPEG-2 Video Decoders Comparison


DmitriyV2
29th May 2006, 14:21
MSU MPEG-2 Video Decoders Comparison

The main goal was to comparatively evaluate quality of MPEG-2 decoders while decoding distorted streams. This question is topical for satellite broadcasting (poor weather conditions, or satellite signal) and, to a lesser degree, for DVD video playback (scratched DVD disk).

Main idea:
We prepared damaged stream and decompressed this stream with every tested decoder (so decoders was compared on the same damaged stream). Such comparison was done 100 times for every error probability to received reliable results.

See comparison chart:

http://www.compression.ru/video/codec_comparison/images/scheme_eng.png

Tested decoders:
* bitcontrol MPEG-2 Video Decoder
* DScaler MPEG2 Video Decoder
* Elecard MPEG-2 Video Decoder
* ffdshow MPEG-4 Video Decoder (libavcodec)
* InterVideo Video Decoder
* Ligos MPEG Video Decoder
* MainConcept MPEG Video Decoder
* Pinnacle MPEG-2 Decoder

See all detailes on comparison page (http://www.compression.ru/video/codec_comparison/mpeg-2_2006_en.html). All results are presented in PDF (2Mb) (http://www.compression.ru/video/codec_comparison/pdf/msu_mpeg_2_decoder_comparison_2006_eng.pdf).

This was "small" comparison to test new methodology. We plan more extended comparisons this year.

Enjoy! :)

DmitriyV2
9th June 2006, 15:47
We try to find similar comparisons (when codecs compared on broken data). If anybody know such comparisons - please let us know!

xyloy
9th June 2006, 20:27
ffdshow MPEG-4 Video Decoder (libavcodec)
why not also compare with libmpeg2, wich is also in Media Player Classic(although it's only based on it) ?
I find it very clean and fast. I hoped it was in the comparison, but libavcodec's performances are as much interesting. :)

edit: I've read why in the .PDF, nevermind the question. ^^

DmitriyV2
22nd June 2006, 11:26
why not also compare with libmpeg2, wich is also in Media Player Classic(although it's only based on it) ?
I find it very clean and fast. I hoped it was in the comparison, but libavcodec's performances are as much interesting. :)

edit: I've read why in the .PDF, nevermind the question. ^^
Thanks for careful reading! :)

faam
30th September 2007, 19:46
I am woundering Sir why this comparison does not encluded four of the famoust widely used decoders :
Sonic cinemaster(Cineplayer)
Gabest MPV (MPC internal decoder)
Nvidia Purevideo Decoder
ATI MPEG2 Video Decoder

Adub
30th September 2007, 21:39
faam,
This comparison is a year old. Last year, ATI Mpeg2 was still bugging out left and right. I am not quite sure about the others, but I do remeber that ATI was not a very strong contender.

faam
3rd October 2007, 23:46
faam,
This comparison is a year old. Last year, ATI Mpeg2 was still bugging out left and right. I am not quite sure about the others, but I do remeber that ATI was not a very strong contender.

Thanks for reminding but if there will be next comparison
to include these decoders

Regards

DmitriyV2
4th October 2007, 13:16
Thanks for reminding but if there will be next comparison to include these decoders
Good idea. We have no financing to provide this comparison very often, but we plan regulary update them.

In March 2007 we published updated comparison of lossless codecs for example. Also we organize annual H.264 codec's comparison.