Log in

View Full Version : pictures to disk.


abmay
28th April 2006, 22:42
Hi,Can anybody help me with a small problem please.
I have many pictures of family in a file and recently decided to see if I can put them on disk (CD) it worked great,now I can only get approx 10 pics per disk,so is there a way to shrink photos (a bit like MP3's) to get more pics on the disks.
thank you.........bob k.:o

setarip_old
28th April 2006, 22:48
Hi!

Just about any "Paint" or "Graphics" program should provide you with the ability to compress and/or reduce the resolution of your images.

What format are they in?

HardwareGeek
30th April 2006, 03:26
Hi bob,is there a way to shrink photosWhat type of files are they? JPEGs?

I use the queen of graphics programs, Paint ;).

I go to > Image > Stretch / Skew and change the horizontal and vertical percentages to something like 50% for both. This makes the pictures smaller tho'. You can save as gif, jpg, tiff, or png. JPGs tend to be rather small.

Would like to hear from those who know of other good imaging programs that don't cost. thx!

SallyDog
30th April 2006, 03:41
Use batch processing in IrfanView to resize and save.

siddharthagandhi
30th April 2006, 03:45
I reccomend Interactive JPEG Optimizer, a freeware program that is intended specifically to control JPEG compression and quality. Absolutely fantastic results.

Soulhunter
30th April 2006, 16:55
I use the queen of graphics programs, Paint ;).

I go to > Image > Stretch / Skew and change the horizontal and vertical percentages to something like 50% for both...
Ouch, iirc paint resizes without interpolation aka. nearest-neighbor resizing... :s


Bye

HardwareGeek
30th April 2006, 17:07
Ouch, iirc paint resizes without interpolation aka. nearest-neighbor resizingIt does drastically reduce the size of pics. By alot more than 50%, too. You recommend?

Soulhunter
30th April 2006, 17:49
It does drastically reduce the size of pics. By alot more than 50%, too. You recommend?
The filesize is reduced because you downsize the image, not because you dont use interpolation! Downsizing to 50% with something like lanczos resampling will result in much better quality (less jaggy edges) and the resulting filesize will be still the same as without interpolation (for png probably slightly bigger, for jpeg probably slightly smaller).

Small compare: Source (http://img172.imageshack.us/img172/636/source3ai.png) / Paint resized (http://img290.imageshack.us/img290/7681/nnr5qr.png) / Lanczos resized (http://img290.imageshack.us/img290/7775/lancr7hk.png)

EDIT: Seems paint uses different resampling methods for up/down-sizing! Something close to nearest-neighbor for upsizing and something close to bicubic for downsizing... ms suckage, lol!

HardwareGeek
30th April 2006, 17:58
thanks!

ultimatebilly
1st May 2006, 15:29
Use Gimp (http://www.gimp.org/)!
It takes a little time to get used to, but is very, very powerfull!

HardwareGeek
2nd May 2006, 00:13
thx again

Mug Funky
2nd May 2006, 10:01
now I can only get approx 10 pics per disk

yikes! 70 meg jpegs?? damn, those are some high res photos :)

or are you using floppy discs? :)