View Full Version : How to best convert 720x480 60i to 320x240 30p?
adoniscik
26th April 2006, 03:30
I am encoding for the Web, so I need to reduce the size of my videos. I thought a good idea would be to somehow combine the 360x480 fields to get 30P then to correct the aspect ratio to get a 320x240.
I would prefer to do this in Vegas or After Effects.
Mug Funky
26th April 2006, 08:35
if you're after combining the fields, just do a straight resize. bicubic if you can.
halving the vertical res means field 1 gets mushed into field 2, but in a way that doesn't bollock anything up.
this'll be the fastest method.
adoniscik
27th April 2006, 00:12
Are you saying that simply resizing 720x480 to 320x240 is the optimal solution? What about the frame rate conversion? After resizing I will still have a 60i file...
Mug Funky
27th April 2006, 10:32
if your footage is interpreted as progressive, the resize will turn 60i (60 fields interlaced into 30 full frames) into 30p - the interlace is destroyed by the resize.
Guest
27th April 2006, 13:26
How to best convert 720x480 60i to 320x240 30p? Please read and follow forum rules, specifically, rule 12: do not ask what's best. Thank you.
adoniscik
27th April 2006, 14:05
I forgot about that one! For this particular case of halving the resolution I think there was a recommended procedure, and I could not remember it.
Backwoods
28th April 2006, 03:43
Please read and follow forum rules, specifically, rule 12: do not ask what's best. Thank you.
Do you search for "best" every so often?
Guest
28th April 2006, 04:15
Do you search for "best" every so often? I read every post. :)
Sulik
28th April 2006, 06:20
In some cases, there is a valid 'best' answer, or in this case three with different tradeoffs:
1. no loss of spatial or temporal resolution: deinterlace to 480/60p then downsample to 240/60p. Unfortunately, this is impractical sonce 60Hz encoding doesn't make sense at such low resolutions (probably implies a low bitrate as well).
2. (preferred): deinterlace 480i to 480/30p, then downsample to 240/30p. This is the most common way, and the quality will be as good as the deinterlacer can provide (the only loss here is temporal resolution, no different than DivX/WMV etc).
3. (different tradeoff): directly scale from 480i to 240p, blending both fields together. This has the advantage of making fast motion appear smoother, by creating a blur-like effect, but will also produce ghosting artifacts, that are usually more annoying than #2.
LocalH
28th April 2006, 07:01
Also be sure to crop to 704px width before resizing to 320px, to preserve proper aspect.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.