Z!ppo
29th March 2006, 17:42
I was reading the xvid faq when I noticed this :
B3. Any hardware recommendations for encoding?
Yes. Get a fast machine. How fast? As fast as your money can buy. Easy eh? Encoding speed depends on raw CPU power, CPU-to-Memory busspeed, Memory speed, and Harddisk speed, in that particular order. You can have a fancy Graphics card that cost you $500 but it won't help you encode one bit faster.
Concerning other parts of your machine, it should be noted that every extra component requires at least some CPU power, even if it's not used. Especially sound and network cards (including 'on-board' ones) can depend heavily on the CPU to do much of their processing. And while Creative soundcards tend to have a lower CPU usage, there are many other reasons not to use them. Another thing is historical: XviD tends to be slightly more optimized for AMD CPU's than for Intel CPU's. But that can change any time.
ok, so you need as many cpu power as possible, but does that improve encoding speed or quality ?
B3. Any hardware recommendations for encoding?
Yes. Get a fast machine. How fast? As fast as your money can buy. Easy eh? Encoding speed depends on raw CPU power, CPU-to-Memory busspeed, Memory speed, and Harddisk speed, in that particular order. You can have a fancy Graphics card that cost you $500 but it won't help you encode one bit faster.
Concerning other parts of your machine, it should be noted that every extra component requires at least some CPU power, even if it's not used. Especially sound and network cards (including 'on-board' ones) can depend heavily on the CPU to do much of their processing. And while Creative soundcards tend to have a lower CPU usage, there are many other reasons not to use them. Another thing is historical: XviD tends to be slightly more optimized for AMD CPU's than for Intel CPU's. But that can change any time.
ok, so you need as many cpu power as possible, but does that improve encoding speed or quality ?