gm4it
23rd January 2006, 16:34
I have difficult in in the comprension about the compressibility check criteria of gordian konot.
In a Forum in Doom9.org I only found the following about the functionality:
"The test compares what the maximum b/p*f value could possibly be, against the bitrate you've currently configured, usually by selecting a file size. It is that ratio, expressed as a percentage of maximum bitrate, that is important."
But is it correct calculate the RATIO compareing the average value with the maximum?
- If we suppose that only a frame in the output has a value b/p*f equal to the maximum value, the overall loss of information is insignificant, depending on the total number of frames checked and the percentage reported by the compressibilty check (roughly): RATIO * 1/F.
- if we suppose that all the frames in the output have a value b/p*f equal to the maximum value, the loss is (roughly): RATIO * 1.
A better ratio should be weighted, with the number of frames that loss information and the entity of loss. For example a better ratio could be estimated in this way:
1.should be calculated the ratio for each frame checked,
2.the ratios summed,
3.and divided by the number of frames checked.
Regards.
Giorgio
In a Forum in Doom9.org I only found the following about the functionality:
"The test compares what the maximum b/p*f value could possibly be, against the bitrate you've currently configured, usually by selecting a file size. It is that ratio, expressed as a percentage of maximum bitrate, that is important."
But is it correct calculate the RATIO compareing the average value with the maximum?
- If we suppose that only a frame in the output has a value b/p*f equal to the maximum value, the overall loss of information is insignificant, depending on the total number of frames checked and the percentage reported by the compressibilty check (roughly): RATIO * 1/F.
- if we suppose that all the frames in the output have a value b/p*f equal to the maximum value, the loss is (roughly): RATIO * 1.
A better ratio should be weighted, with the number of frames that loss information and the entity of loss. For example a better ratio could be estimated in this way:
1.should be calculated the ratio for each frame checked,
2.the ratios summed,
3.and divided by the number of frames checked.
Regards.
Giorgio