jfsecure
12th January 2006, 19:15
We are setting up a test station to start our testing with h264 and have three requirements.
1.) Single pass high quality capture
2.) Reasonable File Size
3.) Hardware based capture from sVideo source (don't ask - outside our control)
The video footage is high motion sports video from a long distance away.
I have been testing the x264 software with mixed results and realize it is time to throw some hardware at this to increase the performance.
While I don't mind testing software settings, hardware can get expensive if we decide to make changes.
Here is what I am thinking,
AMD 64Bit processor
1GB ram
SATA drives
ATI x1600 video card with h264 assisted encoding - we would have to use the ATI software which makes me nervous but the transcoding speeds if needed in the future and the hardware assistance will hopefully make up for it.
From my research this hardware should give us a good base to setup our capture system but I thought I would sound off to hear what other people think.
1.) Single pass high quality capture
2.) Reasonable File Size
3.) Hardware based capture from sVideo source (don't ask - outside our control)
The video footage is high motion sports video from a long distance away.
I have been testing the x264 software with mixed results and realize it is time to throw some hardware at this to increase the performance.
While I don't mind testing software settings, hardware can get expensive if we decide to make changes.
Here is what I am thinking,
AMD 64Bit processor
1GB ram
SATA drives
ATI x1600 video card with h264 assisted encoding - we would have to use the ATI software which makes me nervous but the transcoding speeds if needed in the future and the hardware assistance will hopefully make up for it.
From my research this hardware should give us a good base to setup our capture system but I thought I would sound off to hear what other people think.