View Full Version : DV capture, but no interlacing artifacts !
ariga
23rd November 2005, 16:47
I capture analog video from TV with TRV-355E camcorder. When playing the DV avi in VDub, I noticed two clips that did not exhibit any interlacing artifacts. It appeared as though they had already been deinterlaced. All the captures are from the same TV channel. How is it possible ?
More importantly, what deinterlacing (avisynth) filters should I use on such clips?
Jalavera
23rd November 2005, 18:09
Not always TV is really interlaced. Sometimes films are false interlaced. Look at 100fps.com
jggimi
23rd November 2005, 18:18
Moving to DV forum.
ariga
24th November 2005, 09:49
Does that mean if I capture progressive analog content with my camcorder, the DV avi will also be progressive ? I am confused since my camcorder only shoots interlaced. :confused:
Kika
24th November 2005, 10:02
You are right: If the source is progressive, it will stay progressive. Interlaced only means - in this case -, that a picture will be splitted into two fields. But both fields are from the same picture and as a result, you have a progressive movie.
ariga
24th November 2005, 14:13
Thanks a lot Kika. I thought interlaced video only was field based. Well, now it saves me some time since I don't need to run any deinterlacing filters on it.
bb
24th November 2005, 19:32
But you may wish to use Telecide (either the AviSynth or the VirtualDub version) in case of field swaps occuring now and then.
bb
ariga
25th November 2005, 14:47
Telecide would be for NTSC DV only I guess ?
Guest
25th November 2005, 15:07
Telecide would be for NTSC DV only I guess ? No. Telecide by itself is a general field matcher. It doesn't care about frame size or frame rate.
You are probably thinking of Telecide followed by Decimate to do IVTC.
ariga
25th November 2005, 17:48
Well, many websites say Telecide = IVTC. :(
My knowledge of fields/frames/interlacing is poor. Will read up a little and post more queries (here or on the newbies forum. ?)
ariga
29th November 2005, 11:24
Well, I read a little and had a look at Telecide from Decomb package. But I am not very good at determining whether or not to use Telecide. SeparateFields and AssumeTFF/AssumeBFF both looked same. :stupid: Uploading a few frames from the capture here (http://rapidshare.de/files/8321258/dv_sample.avi.html). Someone pls let me know how to process it.
Guest
29th November 2005, 15:49
>SeparateFields and AssumeTFF/AssumeBFF both looked same.
That is what one would expect with progressive content.
The clip you uploaded is progressive. There's no need to IVTC or deinterlace it.
If you need Telecide() to protect against field phase changes, use BFF for DV.
ariga
29th November 2005, 16:12
SeparateFields and AssumeTFF/AssumeBFF both looked same.
That is what one would expect with progressive content.
NOW I know :thanks:
If you need Telecide() to protect against field phase changes, use BFF for DV.
Whatever that means. But I'll take your word for it ;)
"field phase" <=> "field dominance" (Avisynth terminology) ?
Guest
29th November 2005, 17:53
Try your movie without Telecide. Do you ever see combing? If not, you don't need Telecide(). If you do see combing add Telecide configured for BFF.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.