View Full Version : Ateme's MPEG-4/AVC Encoder Suite
SeeMoreDigital
28th October 2005, 23:56
As reported on Doom9's news page (Sat 29 Oct)..... Ateme appears to be offering an AVC encoder suite of there own (http://www.ateme.com/products/pcencoder.php) with "high profile" encoding (ie: before Nero7).
At first glance their GUI look very uncluttered... Can anybody add anything more?
Cheers
bond
29th October 2005, 00:09
its not available for the broad public. ateme doesnt even tell how much it costs...
Gendal
29th October 2005, 03:05
Fully multithreaded with farm encoding on remote servers? Yum. Curious as to a ballpark pricing figure. We talking ~$500 or more like ~$20,000?
SeeMoreDigital
29th October 2005, 10:51
I have taken the liberty of enlarging the GUI's (in no particular order).....
01 - The "Job Addition": -
http://img493.imageshack.us/img493/5417/jobedition3yz.png
02 - The "File Preview": -
http://img495.imageshack.us/img495/8868/filepreview8mw.png
03 - The "Decoder Settings": -
http://img472.imageshack.us/img472/8532/atemeencodersettings9oi.png
In the "Decoder Settings" window, under "Motion Estimation".... can you guys see a "Quarter Pixel" option too?
Cheers
Sagittaire
29th October 2005, 10:59
QPel is always the default setting for NDAVC (MP & HP) and x264 (very better than HPel only for H264)
This encoder is certainely the final version of the beta testing here with exactly the same specifications : High Profil, interlaced support, multi-thread support ...
acidsex
29th October 2005, 16:22
Wonder if Ateme will make a free copy availble to us beta testers as a thank you. Hint. Hint.
Latexxx
29th October 2005, 17:08
That bobsledge looks very good indeed as compered to the text. This must be a proof of Ateme's encoder's superiority. ;)
foxyshadis
30th October 2005, 01:32
Does motion range really say "256"? Eep!
I guess the partitions/sub-partitions are the multithreaded support.
ChronoCross
30th October 2005, 01:37
Wonder if Ateme will make a free copy availble to us beta testers as a thank you. Hint. Hint.
That's called being greedy. Beta testers are there to help test software for a company usually as a way to show that we care about what their results are for the community benefit. We shouldn't be asking to get their software for free.
bond
30th October 2005, 01:43
That's called being greedy. Beta testers are there to help test software for a company usually as a way to show that we care about what their results are for the community benefit. We shouldn't be asking to get their software for free.that's called being naive ;)
acidsex
30th October 2005, 01:59
Its not really being greedy. Its not like beta testers get paid for testing. We volunteer to help out. If they volunteer a free license, then cool. Certainly they are under no obligation to provide anything.
But as the saying goes, you never know until you ask. Besids, as it appears, it doesnt look to be offered to the general public. So how else will us hobbyists ever get our hands on a legal copy?
*.mp4 guy
30th October 2005, 02:08
That's called being greedy. Beta testers are there to help test software for a company usually as a way to show that we care about what their results are for the community benefit. We shouldn't be asking to get their software for free.
that's called being naive
that's called being naive ;)
I always thought beta testers beta tested so they could try the software before anyone else could, thats why I've always liked beta testing atleast.
ndkamal
30th October 2005, 02:13
You are alright, but I think strange so no one beta testers have received any information about the end of beta test, this version contains the main features of this beta like multithreading or interlacing support, now there no way to do any beta test. I hope so these new features will be include in Nero Digital soon.
dragongodz
30th October 2005, 02:14
i have done testing for several different companies and sometimes you dont even get a thank you at the end while other times they say how helpful you have been. if you go in to it thinking "i will do this so i get something out of it" you are likley to be dissapointed more times than not. you should take the attitude of "i am getting to test out something new". well thats just my opinion anyway. :)
IgorC
30th October 2005, 02:27
"You Can't Always Get What You Want" . Rolling Stones. :p
ChronoCross
30th October 2005, 03:03
that's called being naive ;)
In your opinion anyway. Perhaps it;s just my point of view. Not a lack of understanding or worldly experience. I'd like to think that beta testers aren't greedy little ******* who want nothing but free software. but rather they are people who like to help out and test things.
acidsex
30th October 2005, 03:34
In your opinion anyway. Perhaps it;s just my point of view. Not a lack of understanding or worldly experience. I'd like to think that beta testers aren't greedy little ******* who want nothing but free software. but rather they are people who like to help out and test things.
We do like to help out where we can but we also like to get free stuff too. Its not like I said I expect it, just wonder if they were thinking about it. Ateme/Nero has always been good to its testers and have always been appreciative. If they offer it, it would be awesome.
Didnt mean to take this thread in this direction. Just was thinking out loud.
reefshark
30th October 2005, 04:13
Don't the beta testers get to keep the encoding/decoding engine? That is what they tested. Isn't that enough. As far as the suite is concerned, with no announced price and features like an encoding farm, it will probably cost at least $2000 or more. It looks to me like it is for broadcast or production of hd-dvd/blue ray commercial disks.
Just my thoughts. Can't say I smoke the stuff myself, but pretty soon h.264 will be as widespread as Xvid is now, IMO.
dragongodz
30th October 2005, 04:17
Its not like I said I expect it, just wonder if they were thinking about it. Ateme/Nero has always been good to its testers and have always been appreciative. If they offer it, it would be awesome.
Just was thinking out loud.
if they are thinking about anything then its best to wait for them to say so. otherwise it sounds like you are asking for it no matter if that was your intent or not.
IvS
30th October 2005, 07:52
Just to make things clear, this isn't "news."
That page has been on Ateme's site for a long time, and nothing has changed since then - they offer their encoder only to companies.
bond
30th October 2005, 11:52
i know that some companies pay quite a lot for beta testers so i wouldnt underestimate the value of the beta testing done here for free
on the other side everyone gets the ateme encoder/decoder for free (but no updates),
i dunno tough if i would prefer the encoder or 10€ per hour i test the encoder ;)
Just to make things clear, this isn't "news."
That page has been on Ateme's site for a long time, and nothing has changed since then - they offer their encoder only to companies.according to atemes press release the software was release on October 26th, 2005. so its definitely not "on atemes site for a long time"
also you can delete your own posts of course ;)
Audionut
30th October 2005, 11:59
The software might have been recently released. But as stated that page has been there for quite awhile.
CruNcher
30th October 2005, 18:22
As bond said don't be so naive it was clear from the beginning that R&D and Bugfixes for the Bugs that we found would also be used for Enterprise Products.
Now we just have to wait for the merge of those into Recode that's the only reason i regular Betatest for Ateme, because the R&D + Bugfixing also slips into Enduser Products (NeroDigital), else i wouldn't attend the current Betatest or the ASP Beta in the past :)
LiFe
1st November 2005, 03:44
The suite would be available to anyone who asked.
The quote I receivered was EU$9,000 which is US$11,000 or AU$14,500.
This includes a software licence to run one seat (either PC or Server). 1 year of technical support, and 1 year of maintenance (which I would assume means free upgrades for a year).
The util is obviously targetted at businesses, but is probably one of the most feature complete, fastest, and standards complaint encoder out there (if the beta run is anything to judge by). For us Doom9 readers, it's a little more cost effective to download a Nero keygen :P
PDF Specifications (as per their website) are attached.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.