new x264 feature

[max-holz]

What about this new command "--enable-gprof"?

[bob0r]

What about this new command "--enable-gprof"?

check http://x264.nl :)

http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/manual/gprof-2.9.1/html_mono/gprof.html#SEC1

Also change the title of this post to: new x264 feature --enable-gprof
or something, so people can search for it, and for general purposes.

[IgorC]

I want to ask about other new feature --subme 7
Here is note http://students.washington.edu/lorenm/src/x264/x264_p8rd.2.txt
RD subpel refinement of the best inter mode (suboptimal when combined with mixed-refs)

What does it mean? It's not optimal --subme 7 + mixed refs? For quality or/and for speed?

[Kopernikus]

--subme 7 is not available in Rev 333. It may be included in the future (or not).

[Sirber]

What does it mean? It's not optimal --subme 7 + mixed refs? For quality or/and for speed?For quality. No feature brings speed :p

[IgorC]

--subme 7 is not available in Rev 333. It may be included in the future (or not).

but there is a patch in 333C if I´m not mistake

[DryFire]

I want to ask about other new feature --subme 7
Here is note http://students.washington.edu/lorenm/src/x264/x264_p8rd.2.txt
RD subpel refinement of the best inter mode (suboptimal when combined with mixed-refs)

What does it mean? It's not optimal --subme 7 + mixed refs? For quality or/and for speed?

If they're not optimal together with respect to quality why is that the case?

[Sharktooth]

Please, dont mix the builds names with the SVN revision.
The SVN rev. 333 does not contain what's under "Applied patched" in x264 sticky while my 333C build does.
The note on subme 7 is pretty clear, though. Subme 7 is still not optimal in conjunction with mixed reference frames.
Not optimal doesnt mean it's useless/b0rks/etc... it means its efficiency can be still tweaked to gain more compression with mixed refs.

[IgorC]

Thank you for clearing things.