Night_Raven
10th October 2005, 17:48
Oh, joy, the 5 days 'look but don't touch' are over. I can post.
First of all, sorry if this is not the appropriate section for this topic.
Quite some time ago I recorded the Oscars 2004 on a video tape and now I captured it to my PC. Because my hard disk space is a bit of a problem and since the whole broadcast was more than 3 hours I captured at MPEG2 at the highest bitrate possible, and not huffyuv or MJPEG. Question 1: DVD2AVI reports PROGRESSIVE video, while GSpot reports INTERLACED. Which is more trusted? I suppose GSpot should be but still, better safe than sorry.
I ask in order to know if I should de-interlace. Finally, after a lot of browsing in the internet, I came to the conclusion I seem to always arrive to: try for yourself. I cut out a small part of the video file and tried encoding it with and without deinterlacing. Except for some of those blocks due to the compression I noticed no difference between the deinterlaced and non-interlaced video. They both seemed the same as the original MPEG2. The resolution is 768x576. The source is the german Pro7 television (PAL_B). Should I see a difference and if not, should I de-interlace? The file is aimed for viewing mainly on PC.
The second issue: I have two possible ways to go
1) crop out commercials (duh) and then encode using the MPEG version of VirtualDub with some filters
or
2) crop out commercials (duh), use dvd2avi to demux the audio and do all the processing in AviSynth and then mux the audio and video back together via VDub. Of course audio will be compressed. (the dvd to avi way?)
Which of these two choices is better in terms of quality and speed?
I guess #2 should be better but i'm asking just in case.
All those guides and topics confused me instead of making it clear what should be done. That's why I'm asking.
It would also be simply great if someone could suggest a nice chain of filters I should use.
Edit: missing info.
First of all, sorry if this is not the appropriate section for this topic.
Quite some time ago I recorded the Oscars 2004 on a video tape and now I captured it to my PC. Because my hard disk space is a bit of a problem and since the whole broadcast was more than 3 hours I captured at MPEG2 at the highest bitrate possible, and not huffyuv or MJPEG. Question 1: DVD2AVI reports PROGRESSIVE video, while GSpot reports INTERLACED. Which is more trusted? I suppose GSpot should be but still, better safe than sorry.
I ask in order to know if I should de-interlace. Finally, after a lot of browsing in the internet, I came to the conclusion I seem to always arrive to: try for yourself. I cut out a small part of the video file and tried encoding it with and without deinterlacing. Except for some of those blocks due to the compression I noticed no difference between the deinterlaced and non-interlaced video. They both seemed the same as the original MPEG2. The resolution is 768x576. The source is the german Pro7 television (PAL_B). Should I see a difference and if not, should I de-interlace? The file is aimed for viewing mainly on PC.
The second issue: I have two possible ways to go
1) crop out commercials (duh) and then encode using the MPEG version of VirtualDub with some filters
or
2) crop out commercials (duh), use dvd2avi to demux the audio and do all the processing in AviSynth and then mux the audio and video back together via VDub. Of course audio will be compressed. (the dvd to avi way?)
Which of these two choices is better in terms of quality and speed?
I guess #2 should be better but i'm asking just in case.
All those guides and topics confused me instead of making it clear what should be done. That's why I'm asking.
It would also be simply great if someone could suggest a nice chain of filters I should use.
Edit: missing info.