Marsu42
9th October 2005, 22:37
Dear Dr. H264/AVC,
while x264 encoding dvd material two questions occurred to me:
1. Afaik, the only difference between last pass (--pass 2) and n-th pass (--pass 3) ist that the latter does update the stats file. I am wondering what performance penalty this has, if it is small I'd just always use --pass 3 as second stage, have a look at the encoded file and then decide whether to run another --pass 2 on it.
2. Which should usually give more quality when encoding your average hollywood movie, 3 passes w/ a fast first pass using reduced motion search and partitions followed by a second and third medium speed pass (e.g. --me umh), or 2 passes w/ the same high quality settings (e.g. --me esa)? The total processing time would be equal in both cases.
...to me as a long-time XviD user the underlying question is: In which cases does a 3rd pass do some good and what does it do anyway?
Concerning Dr. Doom9, please note that I am not asking which is better, but which is more likely to result in a higher quality encode.
TIA for your input :-)
while x264 encoding dvd material two questions occurred to me:
1. Afaik, the only difference between last pass (--pass 2) and n-th pass (--pass 3) ist that the latter does update the stats file. I am wondering what performance penalty this has, if it is small I'd just always use --pass 3 as second stage, have a look at the encoded file and then decide whether to run another --pass 2 on it.
2. Which should usually give more quality when encoding your average hollywood movie, 3 passes w/ a fast first pass using reduced motion search and partitions followed by a second and third medium speed pass (e.g. --me umh), or 2 passes w/ the same high quality settings (e.g. --me esa)? The total processing time would be equal in both cases.
...to me as a long-time XviD user the underlying question is: In which cases does a 3rd pass do some good and what does it do anyway?
Concerning Dr. Doom9, please note that I am not asking which is better, but which is more likely to result in a higher quality encode.
TIA for your input :-)