Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
16th June 2005, 20:20 | #1 | Link |
MSU G&M Lab
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: MSU G&M Lab
Posts: 318
|
MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 video codecs list
We publish 3-rd h.264 codecs comparison test.
Also we collect information about current available codecs and there stage. If you have ANY new information about H.264 codecs please replay this message! LIST of MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 VIDEO CODECS (Last updated 21 June 2007 - 68 items now!) ----------------------------------------------------------
If you know any more information about H.264 codecs, please add information to Compression-links.info H.264 page.
__________________
With regards Dmitriy Vatolin www.compression.ru/video/ (Last updates: MSU Video Quality Metric 10.1 - faster&more useful) Last edited by DmitriyV2; 21st June 2007 at 13:44. Reason: Update! |
16th June 2005, 20:23 | #2 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,770
|
nice overview!
i hope you had a look at my mpeg-4 sticky, cause there you will find hopfully uptodate descriptions of the features supported in all publically available avc codecs
__________________
Between the weak and the strong one it is the freedom which oppresses and the law that liberates (Jean Jacques Rousseau) I know, that I know nothing (Socrates) MPEG-4 ASP FAQ | AVC/H.264 FAQ | AAC FAQ | MP4 FAQ | MP4Menu stores DVD Menus in MP4 (guide) Ogg Theora | Ogg Vorbis use WM9 today and get Micro$oft controlling the A/V market tomorrow for free |
16th June 2005, 20:45 | #4 | Link | |
Pain and suffering
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,337
|
Quote:
x264 is just as it is, its being developed but you can only label it by revision. http://trac.videolan.org/x264/browser/trunk/ for current revision number. When the time is right, i am sure x264 developers may go for a beta 1,2,3 etc.. then release candidate 1,2,3 etc.. and hopelly a "stable", which may be dubbed as "1.0", will amerge. "In early development stage" will be a better way to name it, http://videolan.org/x264.html > BIG FAT WARNING: x264 is still in early development stage Last edited by bob0r; 16th June 2005 at 20:48. |
|
16th June 2005, 20:59 | #5 | Link |
Life's clearer in 4K UHD
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 12,244
|
Great list Dmitriy,
By the way Ateme have/had a hardware std-def 'Developement Kit' called Thunder.... Cheers
__________________
| I've been testing hardware media playback devices and software A/V encoders and decoders since 2001 | My Network Layout & A/V Gear |
|
16th June 2005, 21:08 | #6 | Link | |
MSU G&M Lab
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: MSU G&M Lab
Posts: 318
|
Quote:
__________________
With regards Dmitriy Vatolin www.compression.ru/video/ (Last updates: MSU Video Quality Metric 10.1 - faster&more useful) |
|
16th June 2005, 21:21 | #7 | Link | ||
MSU G&M Lab
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: MSU G&M Lab
Posts: 318
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
With regards Dmitriy Vatolin www.compression.ru/video/ (Last updates: MSU Video Quality Metric 10.1 - faster&more useful) |
||
16th June 2005, 21:23 | #8 | Link | |
MSU G&M Lab
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: MSU G&M Lab
Posts: 318
|
Quote:
__________________
With regards Dmitriy Vatolin www.compression.ru/video/ (Last updates: MSU Video Quality Metric 10.1 - faster&more useful) |
|
16th June 2005, 22:52 | #10 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,770
|
the moonlight/elecard encoder is the same (defacto these two companies are only one company)
the avc alliance decoder is written by philips (a not uninteresting fact imho) sony's psp also supports avc decoding Quote:
defacto its the only publically available avc high profile encoder, its supports as good as all main profile features (an exception is interlacing) and its quality is definitely one of the best (ok, lets not tell the results of the comparison in advance ) so all-in-all i dont see the point why there should be any comment like "early development" be added to it... in contrary it should be mentioned explicitely that its the only publically available high profile encoder...
__________________
Between the weak and the strong one it is the freedom which oppresses and the law that liberates (Jean Jacques Rousseau) I know, that I know nothing (Socrates) MPEG-4 ASP FAQ | AVC/H.264 FAQ | AAC FAQ | MP4 FAQ | MP4Menu stores DVD Menus in MP4 (guide) Ogg Theora | Ogg Vorbis use WM9 today and get Micro$oft controlling the A/V market tomorrow for free Last edited by bond; 16th June 2005 at 22:57. |
|
17th June 2005, 00:03 | #11 | Link |
Pain and suffering
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,337
|
@bond
Tell that to VideoLAN But, its still early, x264 will become A LOT and A LOT better, i am sure! But more seriously, yes x264 is getting better and better, but i just quoted what is on the videolan website. "early" is objective, for some its early, for some its very mature. |
17th June 2005, 01:04 | #12 | Link | ||
MSU G&M Lab
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: MSU G&M Lab
Posts: 318
|
Quote:
Quote:
Also thanks to bob0r!
__________________
With regards Dmitriy Vatolin www.compression.ru/video/ (Last updates: MSU Video Quality Metric 10.1 - faster&more useful) |
||
17th June 2005, 09:28 | #13 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 8
|
There are really plenty HW encoders down there:
- Harmonic - Tut-Systems (formely VideoTele) - Modulus - Tandberg (mentioned) - SCI Atlanta (mentioned) I see really no point in comparing these against software ones. Their main purpose is really to be used by professional broadcasters to deliver Cable/SAT live TV, thus its all CBR, with narrow marigin for bitrate variablitiy. They also make extended use of SEI signalling like "pict_struct" to adapt to the source (automatic telecine detection, field duplication, etc.). I guess you can't really find any decent software CBR encoder down there to compare to HW ones (well, Nero uses Atheme which of course supports CBR, but it's not exposed in the Nero's gui). Also have in mind that HW encoders most commonly use SDI input for video feed, so you would have to arrange some kind of SDI streaming HW (I recomend BlackMagic Decklink), which will arise questions as to how really those frames are passed to the encoder and if they arrive untouched. The next thing is that you would need a decoder which really supports streams generated by those encoders (MBAFF/PAF, open GOP, SEI), which you'll find really hard to acquire (well, impossible at the Open Source market right now). The last thing is that you'll probably run into difficulties into while trying to acquire those encoders, since they are pretty all in their prototyping stage, and trust me or not, those Vendors don't really like to compare them just yet. Best, |
17th June 2005, 12:12 | #14 | Link | |
MSU G&M Lab
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: MSU G&M Lab
Posts: 318
|
Quote:
I found only SDK for chips only, not for PC codec. Can you send URL?
__________________
With regards Dmitriy Vatolin www.compression.ru/video/ (Last updates: MSU Video Quality Metric 10.1 - faster&more useful) |
|
17th June 2005, 12:33 | #15 | Link | ||
MSU G&M Lab
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: MSU G&M Lab
Posts: 318
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
With regards Dmitriy Vatolin www.compression.ru/video/ (Last updates: MSU Video Quality Metric 10.1 - faster&more useful) |
||
17th June 2005, 12:56 | #16 | Link | |
Life's clearer in 4K UHD
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 12,244
|
Quote:
I've just been reading today in one of my satellite magazines that there's a world-wide shortage of Mpeg4 AVC chip-sets for the up-coming European HDTV set-top boxes. Apparently there are only a few hundred "near-prototype" boxes available for testing. Premiere may have to delay their planned November 1 launch date. Euro 1080 (HD1 and 2) plan to start Mpeg4 AVC HD in September. BskyB are in a flap because they can't get chips.... And Sigma (the chip-set manufacturer) have completely missed the boat, as their Mpeg4 AVC HD chip-set wont be available until Aug/Sep 05. Cheers
__________________
| I've been testing hardware media playback devices and software A/V encoders and decoders since 2001 | My Network Layout & A/V Gear |
|
|
17th June 2005, 22:07 | #17 | Link | |
MSU G&M Lab
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: MSU G&M Lab
Posts: 318
|
Quote:
It's really difficult to compare HW codecs, so I collect there links, but for testing...
__________________
With regards Dmitriy Vatolin www.compression.ru/video/ (Last updates: MSU Video Quality Metric 10.1 - faster&more useful) |
|
21st June 2005, 05:57 | #19 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Malaysia!
Posts: 11
|
Hi!
Great to hear that the comparison is coming back for 2nd round! Here is my suggestion, how about include the codecs's compressibility and performance (speed) in the comparison? Coz in the last comparison, only the codecs's quality is tested. In my opinion, the compressibility and performance also is an important part of the codec (also the part we interested, besides quality). In the last comparison, you guys said is too early to test the codecs's compatibility, so how about this time? In last comparison, Ateme MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 beat all the codecs who took part, let see what will happens this time when x264 kick in! |
24th June 2005, 20:54 | #20 | Link | |
MSU G&M Lab
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: MSU G&M Lab
Posts: 318
|
Quote:
BTW Intel fellow offer us to use Intel codecs from IPP (thay support H.264 decoder in 5.0 beta and going to support encoder). Of course, they suggest to add time measurements.
__________________
With regards Dmitriy Vatolin www.compression.ru/video/ (Last updates: MSU Video Quality Metric 10.1 - faster&more useful) Last edited by DmitriyV2; 24th June 2005 at 21:10. Reason: errors fix :) |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|