Profil XviD for NB ... ;-)

Sagittaire · 4th June 2004, 00:17

Install XviD 1.0, excecute these reg profil and begin encoding ... ;-)

Best Quality

Unrestricted, Ultra High, VHQ4, Bframe 2/1.50/1.00, AQ, GMC, QPel, Treilli, HVS-Best et interval quant 2-31

http://jfl1974.free.fr/Download/Best-XviD.reg

Quote:

Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\GNU\XviD]
"quant_type"=dword:00000002
"lum_masking"=dword:00000001
"qpel"=dword:00000001
"gmc"=dword:00000001
"use_bvop"=dword:00000001
"max_bframes"=dword:00000002
"bquant_ratio"=dword:00000096
"bquant_offset"=dword:00000064
"packed"=dword:00000001
"closed_gov"=dword:00000001
"motion_search"=dword:00000006
"vhq_mode"=dword:00000004
"chromame"=dword:00000001
"min_iquant"=dword:00000002
"max_iquant"=dword:0000001f
"min_pquant"=dword:00000002
"max_pquant"=dword:0000001f
"min_bquant"=dword:00000002
"max_bquant"=dword:0000001f
"trellis_quant"=dword:00000001
"profile"="(unrestricted)"
"qmatrix_intra"=hex:08,10,10,10,11,12,15,18,10,10,10,10,11,13,16,19,10,10,11,\
12,14,16,19,1d,10,10,12,15,18,1b,1f,24,11,11,14,18,1e,23,29,2f,12,13,16,1b,\
23,2c,36,41,15,16,19,1f,29,36,46,58,18,19,1d,24,2f,41,58,73
"qmatrix_inter"=hex:12,12,12,12,13,15,17,1b,12,12,12,12,13,15,18,1d,12,12,13,\
14,16,18,1c,20,12,12,14,18,1b,1e,23,28,13,13,16,1b,21,27,2e,35,15,15,18,1e,\
27,32,3d,49,17,18,1c,23,2e,3d,4f,62,1b,1d,20,28,35,49,62,81

Best Quality + Hardware Profil Optimisation

AS@L5, Ultra High, VHQ4, Bframe 1/1.50/1.00, AQ, Treilli, HVS-Best et interval quant 3-31

http://jfl1974.free.fr/Download/Kiss-XviD.reg

Quote:

Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\GNU\XviD]
"quant_type"=dword:00000002
"lum_masking"=dword:00000001
"interlacing"=dword:00000000
"qpel"=dword:00000000
"gmc"=dword:00000000
"reduced_resolution"=dword:00000000
"use_bvop"=dword:00000001
"max_bframes"=dword:00000001
"bquant_ratio"=dword:00000096
"bquant_offset"=dword:0000004b
"packed"=dword:00000001
"closed_gov"=dword:00000001
"motion_search"=dword:00000006
"vhq_mode"=dword:00000004
"chromame"=dword:00000001
"cartoon_mode"=dword:00000000
"turbo"=dword:00000000
"max_key_interval"=dword:0000012c
"frame_drop_ratio"=dword:00000000
"min_iquant"=dword:00000003
"max_iquant"=dword:0000001f
"min_pquant"=dword:00000003
"max_pquant"=dword:0000001f
"min_bquant"=dword:00000003
"max_bquant"=dword:0000001f
"trellis_quant"=dword:00000001
"fourcc_used"=dword:00000000
"debug"=dword:00000000
"vop_debug"=dword:00000000
"profile"="AS @ L5"
"qmatrix_intra"=hex:08,10,10,10,11,12,15,18,10,10,10,10,11,13,16,19,10,10,11,\
12,14,16,19,1d,10,10,12,15,18,1b,1f,24,11,11,14,18,1e,23,29,2f,12,13,16,1b,\
23,2c,36,41,15,16,19,1f,29,36,46,58,18,19,1d,24,2f,41,58,73
"qmatrix_inter"=hex:12,12,12,12,13,15,17,1b,12,12,12,12,13,15,18,1d,12,12,13,\
14,16,18,1c,20,12,12,14,18,1b,1e,23,28,13,13,16,1b,21,27,2e,35,15,15,18,1e,\
27,32,3d,49,17,18,1c,23,2e,3d,4f,62,1b,1d,20,28,35,49,62,81

CruNcher · 4th June 2004, 00:29

@Sagittaire

for which bitrate this is optimized and tested ?
and if i see your settings you don't really care about the Speed/Quality factor do you ? So i guess you allready tried my Extra_Detail Profile Test Build and proved that i'ts bad then please write in my thread and say so. Takeing testuser for such a important step in enhanceing Situation based Encoding efficiency is bad of you imho and im shocked about this behaveiour of you

JohnMK · 4th June 2004, 00:35

@Cruncher: Not everyone still uses a Celeron 1.2GHz.

I use similar settings as the original poster (well, I don't use AQ anyone 'cuz of that thread a week or so ago that trashed it) and I'm a little leery of GMC 'cuz I don't know what it's good for or if it really helps, but actually I use identical settings otherwise. I stick to quants 2 & 3 and maybe some 4 (80% compressibility result). It's not accurate to talk bitrates when what really matters is quants IMO. I also keep the keep much of the original resolution, downscaling to no less than 640 resolution horizontally.

CruNcher · 4th June 2004, 00:39

Quote:

I use similar settings as the original poster (well, I don't use AQ anyone 'cuz of that thread a week or so ago that trashed it)

sorry thats lame if you dont prove something yourself what another one is saying is wrong then im sorry for you
Looks like you still dont understand the purpose of what i did for arround 1 year now

Wait till you come into XviD and i chop your head off

JohnMK · 4th June 2004, 07:57

OK, let me invent the 29 hour day here and I'll find time to invent & verify everything on my own.

Teegedeck · 4th June 2004, 08:46

@Sagittaire:...
Thanks for advertising those settings that were recommended to you (after your initial settings had become the object of heavy criticism).

@JohnMK: Nobody 'trashed' AQ - AQ is a great thing. Some blocks in a dark-blue background represent a 'problem sample', they don't render it invalid.

I would also hate to see creators of XviD-profiles/matrices/whatever starting to quarrel about the quality or merits of each other's work. Please don't do that.

Edit: And please, everyone, don't make a downloadable registry-entry if it would be sufficient to just list those settings. Especially if they are so close to the standard-settings as these. Posting a new thread with a downloadable profile sounds like a contribution at first but on second thoughts it isn't much different from posting something like 'hey, try my new and cool XviD settings'... As Cruncher said, something like that would have to be justified by tests or something - in this case though Sagittaire just posted settings that had been recommended in diverse threads over and over (they're my standard settings btw, except for packed bitstream).

jon.schaffer · 4th June 2004, 16:31

a week or so ago and a dark-blue background... I think it's related to my thread (?)...

Well, Teegedeck is right: Adaptive Quantization is not rendered invalid by such a test...
I'm embarassed to see some people draw such a conclusion... I didn't mean it!
I wouldn't like my test to be badly interpreted, JohnMK. Read again the thread, I did not say "AQ is bullshit". On the contrary, I think it is a powerful option... and I persist in using it.

Yours,

Jon

bot · 4th June 2004, 17:03

*groan* Are register entries really necessary? Register entries is the reason why I never more than glanced att RV.

RadicalEd · 4th June 2004, 17:31

Quote:

Originally posted by bot
*groan* Are register entries really necessary? Register entries is the reason why I never more than glanced att RV.

RV doesn't require those

bot · 4th June 2004, 18:16

My apologies. I got that impression from reading about registry tweaks in just about every thread I looked at about RV (and I think it's mentioned the codec comparison too).

(And a second apology for dragging RV into the xvid forum a second time).

RadicalEd · 4th June 2004, 18:30

[RV]
It's easy enough to get confused with all the Helix stuff flying around. Check out Easy RealMedia Producer.
[/RV]

4th June 2004, 00:29	#2 \| Link
CruNcher Registered User Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Germany Posts: 2,704	@Sagittaire for which bitrate this is optimized and tested ? and if i see your settings you don't really care about the Speed/Quality factor do you ? So i guess you allready tried my Extra_Detail Profile Test Build and proved that i'ts bad then please write in my thread and say so. Takeing testuser for such a important step in enhanceing Situation based Encoding efficiency is bad of you imho and im shocked about this behaveiour of you __________________ all my compares are riddles so please try to decipher them yourselves :) current Main XviD PSNRLab version 1.1 current XviD PSNRLab update 1.1.3 MT1389xx Player Infos XviD EDP Build CVS (CruNchers Visual System ©) V 1.4 new with predefined profiles ;) Code: Olivera: "We're expendable assets" "and we've just been expended" "It's not a trick it's a Sony Rootkit" pwnz :devil: :angry: :rolleyes: Last edited by CruNcher; 4th June 2004 at 00:45.

4th June 2004, 08:46	#6 \| Link
Teegedeck Moderator, Ex(viD)-Mascot Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 2,564	@Sagittaire:... Thanks for advertising those settings that were recommended to you (after your initial settings had become the object of heavy criticism). @JohnMK: Nobody 'trashed' AQ - AQ is a great thing. Some blocks in a dark-blue background represent a 'problem sample', they don't render it invalid. I would also hate to see creators of XviD-profiles/matrices/whatever starting to quarrel about the quality or merits of each other's work. Please don't do that. Edit: And please, everyone, don't make a downloadable registry-entry if it would be sufficient to just list those settings. Especially if they are so close to the standard-settings as these. Posting a new thread with a downloadable profile sounds like a contribution at first but on second thoughts it isn't much different from posting something like 'hey, try my new and cool XviD settings'... As Cruncher said, something like that would have to be justified by tests or something - in this case though Sagittaire just posted settings that had been recommended in diverse threads over and over (they're my standard settings btw, except for packed bitstream). __________________ It's a man's life in Doom9's 52nd MPEG division. "The cat sat on the mat." ATM I'm thoroughly enjoying the Banshee - a fantastic music player/ripper for Linux. Give it a whirl! Last edited by Teegedeck; 4th June 2004 at 09:39.

4th June 2004, 16:31	#7 \| Link
jon.schaffer Eternally Junior Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: France Posts: 229	Oops... a week or so ago and a dark-blue background... I think it's related to my thread (?)... Well, Teegedeck is right: Adaptive Quantization is not rendered invalid by such a test... I'm embarassed to see some people draw such a conclusion... I didn't mean it! I wouldn't like my test to be badly interpreted, JohnMK. Read again the thread, I did not say "AQ is bullshit". On the contrary, I think it is a powerful option... and I persist in using it. Yours, Jon __________________ "Methinks it is like a weasel" (Hamlet in Hamlet, by Shakespeare)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

4th June 2004, 00:35	#3 \| Link
JohnMK Registered User Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Seattle Posts: 551	@Cruncher: Not everyone still uses a Celeron 1.2GHz. I use similar settings as the original poster (well, I don't use AQ anyone 'cuz of that thread a week or so ago that trashed it) and I'm a little leery of GMC 'cuz I don't know what it's good for or if it really helps, but actually I use identical settings otherwise. I stick to quants 2 & 3 and maybe some 4 (80% compressibility result). It's not accurate to talk bitrates when what really matters is quants IMO. I also keep the keep much of the original resolution, downscaling to no less than 640 resolution horizontally.

4th June 2004, 07:57	#5 \| Link
JohnMK Registered User Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Seattle Posts: 551	OK, let me invent the 29 hour day here and I'll find time to invent & verify everything on my own.

4th June 2004, 17:03	#8 \| Link
bot Registered User Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 56	groan Are register entries really necessary? Register entries is the reason why I never more than glanced att RV.

4th June 2004, 18:16	#10 \| Link
bot Registered User Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 56	My apologies. I got that impression from reading about registry tweaks in just about every thread I looked at about RV (and I think it's mentioned the codec comparison too). (And a second apology for dragging RV into the xvid forum a second time).

4th June 2004, 18:30	#11 \| Link
RadicalEd Registered User Join Date: Dec 2001 Posts: 987	[RV] It's easy enough to get confused with all the Helix stuff flying around. Check out Easy RealMedia Producer. [/RV]