Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > Video Encoding > MPEG-4 ASP

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1st June 2004, 19:26   #1  |  Link
gnr
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 41
chroma optimizer and i frame boost?

is chroma optimizer (zone options) good for whole movie (not only the credits) encoding. and 2nd pass option i-frame boost (default 10) controls quality? should i leave it as default for all movies or need to change it sometimes.

thanks in advance.
gnr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2004, 19:41   #2  |  Link
Jawor
4 8 15 16 23 42
 
Jawor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Island
Posts: 127
Re: chroma optimizer and i frame boost?

Quote:
Originally posted by gnr
and 2nd pass option i-frame boost (default 10) controls quality? should i leave it as default for all movies or need to change it sometimes.
Values from 0 to 10 usually work fine. Setting it too high may result in so called keyframe pumping - sudden jumps of quality when I-frames are displayed.
__________________
Please excuse if my English is crappy

Quant Matrices & XviD Binaries
http://www.videoaudio.pl
Jawor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2004, 21:40   #3  |  Link
gnr
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 41
did u mean setting it to 0 would be better and good for quality?

thanks
gnr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2004, 21:49   #4  |  Link
thoralf
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Thiersechs
Posts: 165
Quote:
Originally posted by gnr
did u mean setting it to 0 would be better and good for quality?
Leaving these settings at their defaults is probably a good idea. If you want max quality, you should go for a one-pass encode with a constant quant of 2 ...

With kind regards,
Thoralf.
thoralf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd June 2004, 18:17   #5  |  Link
Jawor
4 8 15 16 23 42
 
Jawor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Island
Posts: 127
Quote:
Originally posted by gnr
did u mean setting it to 0 would be better and good for quality?
I didn't notice a big difference between 0 and 10.
Quote:
Originally posted by thoralf
Leaving these settings at their defaults is probably a good idea.
Yeah, there's nothing wrong with the default setting.
__________________
Please excuse if my English is crappy

Quant Matrices & XviD Binaries
http://www.videoaudio.pl
Jawor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd June 2004, 20:10   #6  |  Link
gnr
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 41
thanks for the reply. what about chroma optimizer for whole movie, ever tried?
gnr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd June 2004, 13:52   #7  |  Link
Jawor
4 8 15 16 23 42
 
Jawor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Island
Posts: 127
Chroma optimizer blurs colors in very dark and very bright areas where the human eye can't notice it, thus the codec can achieve better compression in these areas. sysKin, is my translation of your explanation at http://www.divx.howto.pl correct?

I never tried to use it for the whole movie. Perhaps I should try
__________________
Please excuse if my English is crappy

Quant Matrices & XviD Binaries
http://www.videoaudio.pl
Jawor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd June 2004, 14:30   #8  |  Link
sysKin
Registered User
 
sysKin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 1,166
Quote:
Originally posted by Jawor
Chroma optimizer blurs colors in very dark and very bright areas where the human eye can't notice it, thus the codec can achieve better compression in these areas. sysKin, is my translation of your explanation at http://www.divx.howto.pl correct?
Yes, that's what it does.
Also explained in Crusty's FAQ if I remember correctly.
It's not a problem if you use it for whole movies - I *think* I do that
__________________
Visit #xvid or #x264 at irc.freenode.net
sysKin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd June 2004, 17:36   #9  |  Link
Jawor
4 8 15 16 23 42
 
Jawor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Island
Posts: 127
Quote:
Originally posted by sysKin
Also explained in Crusty's FAQ if I remember correctly.
The explanation in Crusty's FAQ says:
Quote:
-'Chroma Optimizer enabled' will do some extra magic on color information to minimize the stepped-stairs effect on edges. It will improve quality at the cost of encoding speed. It reduces PSNR by nature. The mathematical deviation to the original picture will get bigger - but the subjective image quality will raise (as mentioned, the "stair step artifacts" get less). Since it works with color information, you might want to turn it off when encoding in greyscale.
That's why I told the guy at DHT that chroma optimizer reduces the stepped-stairs effect ("schodkowatosc").
__________________
Please excuse if my English is crappy

Quant Matrices & XviD Binaries
http://www.videoaudio.pl
Jawor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th June 2004, 18:09   #10  |  Link
gnr
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 41
Quote:
Originally posted by thoralf
Leaving these settings at their defaults is probably a good idea. If you want max quality, you should go for a one-pass encode with a constant quant of 2 ...
i always do 1cd rip, setting i frame boost to 0 will save some bits and those saved bits will be distrubute where necessary to improve quality. plz correct me if i am wrong.
gnr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th June 2004, 00:16   #11  |  Link
lordadmira
Registered User
 
lordadmira's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Zinzinnati
Posts: 281
Yes but there are reletively few key frames, so giving them a little more data won't affect much overall. It will actually increase quality since all those P and B frames will be predicted off those higher quality I frames. The benefit is greater the fewer key frames there are.

I leave chroma optimizer turned on as a standard default for all my encodes.

LA
__________________
Anata wa baka da! REPENT!
lordadmira is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th June 2004, 19:46   #12  |  Link
gnr
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 41
thanks Jawor, thoralf, sysKin, lordadmira for the time, really appreciated.
gnr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:03.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.