Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
![]() |
#1 | Link |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Buenos Aires - Argentina
Posts: 43
|
Convert PAL DV to Standard PAL
I´ve to convert files PAL lower field first (DV) to Standard PAL, upper field first. Any suggestion about scritp? Avisynth 2.0x or 2.5x? I´m compressing later the file using TMPGEnc Plus.
Thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | Link |
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,907
|
One trick for reversing the field dominance is to crop one line off the top and then use BorderControl() to duplicate the bottom line.
Note: Swapping fields is not the same as reversing field dominance. Last edited by Guest; 23rd February 2003 at 05:57. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | Link |
Simply me
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lancashire, England
Posts: 610
|
I've only ever played with a DV file once and just did it "by hand" as the saying goes, but I think a dedicated plugin would be quite useful.
I'll knock one up unless you want to Don? regards Simon
__________________
http://www.geocities.com/siwalters_uk/fnews.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | Link |
Simply me
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lancashire, England
Posts: 610
|
erm...
Version 1 Shift all lines up one except the top one. Copy 2nd bottom line to bottom line. Version 1.1 Maybe let use decide whether to shift down instead of up? regards Simon
__________________
http://www.geocities.com/siwalters_uk/fnews.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | Link |
Simply me
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lancashire, England
Posts: 610
|
what a task master
name: ReverseFieldDominance Version 1 will support RGB and YUY2 It'll be compiled for Avisynth 2.5 Once you big boys have sorted out the YV12 chroma interlacing issues it might do YV12 in a later version. I'm just keeping out of the way for now
__________________
http://www.geocities.com/siwalters_uk/fnews.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | Link | |
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,907
|
Re: .oOo.
Quote:
1 3 5 2 4 6 Your method would make: 3 5 7 2 4 6 The dominance has been changed, yes, but the fields have been recombined. Probably in most applications (where reversing dominance is required) that is acceptable. But to maintain the original field combinations, you'd need the shifting method. Also, your method is a bit trickier to implement in a standalone filter. Trivia point: Your method can also be done by: SeparateFields().Trim(1,0).Weave() Last edited by Guest; 23rd February 2003 at 07:37. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | Link | |
Guest
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,907
|
OK, here's a VirtualDub reverse dominance filter
Quote:
Last edited by Guest; 23rd February 2003 at 07:13. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | Link |
Simply me
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lancashire, England
Posts: 610
|
Avisynth version 1.0 (as per functional spec
![]() [Edit: URL corrected] regards Simon
__________________
http://www.geocities.com/siwalters_uk/fnews.html Last edited by Si; 25th February 2003 at 19:21. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 539
|
Hello everybody,
>Version 1 >Shift all lines up one except the top one. >Copy 2nd bottom line to bottom line. >Version 1.1 >Maybe let use decide whether to shift down instead of up? >regards >Simon mmmh, would'nt it be better to swap the even and odd lines like this? Line 001 ---> Line 002 Line 002 ---> Line 001 Line 003 ---> Line 004 Line 004 ---> Line 003 ... Line 575 ---> Line 006 Line 576 ---> Line 005 So the first line of field1 is still the first line, but of field2. I Think this method is a little slower, but it is more correct. Or am i wrong? Maybe you you could let the user select the method? hanfrunz |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | Link |
Simply me
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lancashire, England
Posts: 610
|
@hanfrunz
Well, that corrects the temporal order but at the expense of the spatial field order. Moving everything up by 1 line corrects temporal but keeps spatial order as well. regards Simon
__________________
http://www.geocities.com/siwalters_uk/fnews.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 93
|
Quote:
Just curious, what exactly is the diffenece between the two? For example my capture card gets the field wrong and I always use field swap. Is field dominance also a hardware/driver issue or is it in some sources and not in others? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|