Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > Hardware & Software > PC Hard & Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 16th March 2008, 14:54   #1  |  Link
graysky
Registered User
 
graysky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 429
new HD x264 video encoding benchmark

Techarp is hosting a new HD x264 benchmark. Have a look and run it on your system to help populate the data table.

Basically, you run the test encode of an HD sample (1280x720) and it will report back frames-per-second values for your machine @ it's clock/overclock level. You can run it at your stock settings and at your overclock settings to see how your machine compares to others in the database.

My goal is to have a representative set of data for many different chips and chipsets. Please just report your results here in this thread. I will keep the data at that url to keep things simple.

Thanks all and enjoy!

The following image will be updated automatically as new data comes in. It doesn't display any results, but it does show the number of data points collected so far and how they break down by CPU type:


Last edited by graysky; 18th March 2008 at 21:34.
graysky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2008, 15:11   #2  |  Link
Guest
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,924
Quote:
Originally Posted by graysky View Post
Please just report your results here in this thread. I will keep the data at that url to keep things simple.
I don't get it. It seems simpler to me if we enter our results directly at the site. Why do you want to be a middleman?
Guest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2008, 16:14   #3  |  Link
graysky
Registered User
 
graysky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 429
@neuron2 - Please feel free to do so if you have an account on techarp (accounts are free). Some people don't like to register at new places when they already have accounts. By asking peeps to post to the doom9 thread, it just makes it easier for them to post results at all.

I'm not the middleman, I'm the only person compiling the data. The good folks at TA have graciously agreed to host the file and the results.
graysky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2008, 16:27   #4  |  Link
Guest
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 21,924
I see. Thank you for your explanation.
Guest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th March 2008, 16:33   #5  |  Link
graysky
Registered User
 
graysky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 429
@neuron2 - no problem. Thank you for your work with dgindex
graysky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008, 21:34   #6  |  Link
graysky
Registered User
 
graysky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 429
...3 days and no one has an interest?
graysky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2008, 03:28   #7  |  Link
Konrad Klar
Registered User
 
Konrad Klar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wałbrzych, Poland
Posts: 100
Code:
---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 32.37 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 32.78 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 32.47 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 32.65 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 8.26 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 8.26 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 8.29 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 8.28 fps, 3942.92 kb/s
E6600, 9x333, P965, DDR2, 5-5-5-15 @ 416 MHz, Windows 2003 Server Enterprise Edition SP2.
__________________
GA-EP45-DS3R, Core2Quad Q6600 2400@3000MHz, 8 GB/800 MHz DDR2, Radeon X550 128 MB

Last edited by Konrad Klar; 20th March 2008 at 14:57. Reason: Corrected typo in timings, 5-5-5-11 was wrong.
Konrad Klar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2008, 13:31   #8  |  Link
lucassp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Romania, Timisoara
Posts: 223
Code:
---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 18.54 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 19.20 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 19.21 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 19.13 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.46 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.46 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.46 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.46 fps, 3942.92 kb/s
TL-58, 9.5x200, RS690M, 2GB DDR2@667 5-5-5-15 2T, Windows XP Pro
lucassp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2008, 15:44   #9  |  Link
Dr.Khron
Registered User
 
Dr.Khron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Gotham City, USA
Posts: 389
Eh, ever since I built the new PC, I've been catching up on all the games from the last two years that my PC was too slow to play... Hell, I havn't even OC'ed the new box yet, havn't needed to.

I'm in the midst of a QuakeWars addiction right now, when it dries up in a few days, I'll give your new benchmark a go. It'll be a good excuse to do some OCing and tweaking. I should be able to get a significant boost out of my machine with the stock cooler.
Dr.Khron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2008, 21:08   #10  |  Link
graysky
Registered User
 
graysky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 429
thanks for the data, guys. Will update shortly.
graysky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2008, 12:47   #11  |  Link
Southstorm
20yr Videographer
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Great Northwest
Posts: 272
Code:
---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 12.84 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 12.88 fps, 3904.07 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 12.89 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 12.89 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 3.30 fps, 3941.77 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 3.31 fps, 3942.27 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 3.30 fps, 3941.77 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 3.30 fps, 3941.77 kb/s
Prescott 550, 17x200, 915G, DDR, 3-3-3-8 @ 200MHz, XP Home SP2
Southstorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd April 2008, 17:22   #12  |  Link
deekey777
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 91
Quote:
---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.62 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.77 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.83 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 20.80 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.67 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.67 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.68 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 4.68 fps, 3942.92 kb/s
A64 X2 3600+ (S939), 10x200, DDR400, WinXP SP2, ASRock 939DUAL-VSTA (ULi 1695)
deekey777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2008, 09:59   #13  |  Link
graysky
Registered User
 
graysky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 429
@deekey777- which 3600+ do you have (codename)?
graysky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2008, 11:24   #14  |  Link
deekey777
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by graysky View Post
@deekey777- which 3600+ do you have (codename)?
It's A64 X2 3600+ wit 2x2,0 GHz and 2x256 kB L2 cache for S939.
Codename? Hm, Everest says, it's a Manchester.
deekey777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2008, 12:51   #15  |  Link
DD51
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 98
CPU Q6600
MB Asus P5K Deluxe P35
9x373
3357MHZ
5-5-5-12 @447Mhz 5:6
Windows XP SP2 x32

Quote:
---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 68.98 fps, 3904.67 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 68.77 fps, 3904.67 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 69.29 fps, 3904.67 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 69.86 fps, 3904.67 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 18.93 fps, 3952.97 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 18.97 fps, 3952.97 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 18.96 fps, 3952.97 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 18.95 fps, 3952.97 kb/s
DD51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2008, 13:14   #16  |  Link
graysky
Registered User
 
graysky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 429
Quote:
Originally Posted by deekey777 View Post
It's A64 X2 3600+ wit 2x2,0 GHz and 2x256 kB L2 cache for S939.
Codename? Hm, Everest says, it's a Manchester.
Cool, can you give me the memory timings and final memory speed?
graysky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2008, 14:16   #17  |  Link
deekey777
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by graysky View Post
Cool, can you give me the memory timings and final memory speed?

Dual DDR400, 200 MHz, 2.5-3-3-7 CR1
deekey777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2008, 17:47   #18  |  Link
graysky
Registered User
 
graysky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 429
Thanks man, will update the table shortly.
@DD51 and southstorm - thanks for the data also
graysky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th April 2008, 12:56   #19  |  Link
breez
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 110
Quote:

---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 32.48 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 32.74 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 32.56 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 32.51 fps, 3905.08 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 8.23 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 8.30 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 8.18 fps, 3942.92 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 8.29 fps, 3942.92 kb/s
E4300, 9x333, P35, 4GB DDR2 @ 800MHz 18-5-5-5, Vista x64
breez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th April 2008, 07:48   #20  |  Link
Manao
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: France
Posts: 2,856
Quote:
---------- RUN1PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 58.67 fps, 3904.94 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 58.56 fps, 3904.94 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 58.67 fps, 3904.94 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS1.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 58.71 fps, 3904.94 kb/s

---------- RUN1PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 28.74 fps, 3974.08 kb/s

---------- RUN2PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 28.73 fps, 3974.08 kb/s

---------- RUN3PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 28.70 fps, 3974.08 kb/s

---------- RUN4PASS2.LOG
encoded 1442 frames, 28.73 fps, 3974.08 kb/s
2 x Xeon E5420 @ 2.5 Ghz, 4GB DDR2 @ 333 MHz 5-5-5-15, Windows 2003 Server
__________________
Manao is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:22.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions Inc.