DXVA encoding era has started

[rica]

Hi guys, i can say the new era has started.


Badaboom beta2 is re-encoding to 720p PS3 file with 14-15 fps while the original is 1080p 24. (DXVA)

Even the profiles are limited yet; it is a good start.

You will find here 177.92 FW for nVidia and Badaboom trial:

http://www.nvidia.com/content/forcew.../download2.asp




_ _ _ _ _ _

[CruNcher]

and another test i hope they fixed some source input problems
tough 14-15 fps isn't really fast got 30 fps there with beta1 for 1080p H.264 (Casino Royale) bitstreams to 720p on my 8800 GT
the CPU utilization looks the same as for me around 30%

[Tagert]

thats cool
wonder how good the ati program is compared to this one

[rica]

CruNcher, i lived issues with beta1.
Re-encoding of long clips never been succeeded with beta1.

But this is working very well.

btw my GPU is 8600 GTS E6750 2GB/800 ram...


Tagert, Ati has to wait Cyberlink

[CruNcher]

http://www.badaboomit.com/?q=node/112 <- changes

Support for some web formats such as DIVX, WMV, and FLV have been removed from the accepted input formats but will be added in version 1.1.

Hehe if it doesn't work right remove it

[Atak_Snajpera]

Badaboom beta2 is re-encoding to 720p PS3 file with 14-15 fps while the original is 1080p 24. (DXVA)

Phiiii I have about 12 fps in x264 CRF@22 on quad core 3Ghz . Besides x264 gives alot better quality than this. (baseline profile)

[CruNcher]

Yeah X264 is still better i doubt they updated the Core Engine here but you never know also it's easy to get X264 as fast as ETIs Encoder X264 is the most versaitaile Encoder exisiting you can get it from Ultrafast to Ultraslow and with some code modifications even faster then Ultrafast :P

[rica]

hey guys,

nobody compared a baby with a mature man

Admit or not; some day this baby will growup

[Atak_Snajpera]

Admit or not; some day this baby will growup

yeah right... By that time I will have 8 core cpu

[rica]

What if they give the half of the job to your 4 core and give the remaining job to your GPU

[clsid]

GPUs are only useful for painting ugly Mona Lisas

[rica]

Originally Posted by clsid

GPUs are only useful for painting ugly Mona Lisas

Not bad, is it?




http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/4069/atakns9.png



_ _ _ _ _

[Atak_Snajpera]

It looks like upscaled SD. Was source interlaced?

[rica]

No it was 23.976 1080p h264..

EDIT: This is the source:

http://www.zshare.net/image/179694619043807c/


Edit: sorry, the file is a little big for imageshack i think; btw my tv is 720p.

[G_M_C]

Not another GPU encoder / badaboom thread ....

HEre's another, and i've seen a badaboom-one to; http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=140385

GPU-encoding is really not up to the task of high quality encoding, and it wont be in a long time.

[Atak_Snajpera]

I see serious lost in horizontal resolution. It looks like badly deinterlaced source.

[plonk420]

Originally Posted by Atak_Snajpera

It looks like upscaled SD. Was source interlaced?

ouch. looks good to me for the resolution it was scaled to (720p)

[Atak_Snajpera]

EDIT: This is the source:

What???? This screenshot has 800x450!?!? I don't see 1080p!

[rica]

Ok i've edited..

Here is the source and destination files info:

http://www.zshare.net/image/179701022df70cde/



_ _ _ __ _

[CruNcher]

http://mirror05.x264.nl/CruNcher/?dir=././GPU-Encoding <- here is the old test i did of Beta1 currently testing Beta2 be aware the ETI Encoder killed 10 frames in the beggining here :P