Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > Capturing and Editing Video > Capturing Video
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 25th January 2007, 16:22   #1  |  Link
ross_MoHaX
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 8
Direct WMV capture

One discussion forum will take place in our company, there are will be three to five analog video signals and 5 mono audio signals. My task is convert it to wmv 320 kbit (320x240, 4 sec base frame) as fast as possible.

is there any capture cards that could capture directly in WMV? If no I've some questions to you:
1) Does third party wmv software (as http://www.blazemp.com/video_capture_software.htm) use same wmv codec as native Microsoft WMV encoder?
2) What card I should use? What do you say about Pinnacle Studio Movie Board? Or any ATI Theatre 650 Pro based card (which one?)? Is there any cards which could deinterlace input analog video before passing it to codec?
3) I couldn't find any cmdline based wmv muxer to mux result video track with each of audo track? I cmdline bacause I want to automate my work as much as possible

Any advice will be very helpful.
ross_MoHaX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th January 2007, 07:47   #2  |  Link
Blue_MiSfit
Derek Prestegard IRL
 
Blue_MiSfit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,989
you could probably use VirtualDub to capture to WMV - although it will only encode WMV video in an AVI container. Getting all those input sources captured simultaneously will probably be very difficult without special hardware. I would get an external muxer to handle that however you want (4up display, or alternating every few seconds), and have it output a single stream to your capture card. WMV supports interlacing well, so I would just leave it interlaced

Shouldn't bee too tricky
__________________
These are all my personal statements, not those of my employer :)
Blue_MiSfit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2007, 11:40   #3  |  Link
mgh
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: India
Posts: 321
windows media encoder will capture directly to wmv-use their mpeg4 codec-it needs min cpu. You should not need deinterlacing if you capture at 320x240.
__________________
A shut mouth gathers no foot
mgh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2007, 14:19   #4  |  Link
AHelpingHand
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 9
I don't think capturing directly in WMV will give you the best results.
AHelpingHand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2007, 06:58   #5  |  Link
zambelli
Doom9ing since 2001
 
zambelli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 2,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by ross_MoHaX View Post
is there any capture cards that could capture directly in WMV?
I'm not aware of any.
Quote:
If no I've some questions to you:
1) Does third party wmv software (as http://www.blazemp.com/video_capture_software.htm) use same wmv codec as native Microsoft WMV encoder?
Typically it does. For most companies it's cheaper to pay the licensing fee and use Microsoft's codecs than implement WM codecs entirely from scratch.
Quote:
2) What card I should use? What do you say about Pinnacle Studio Movie Board? Or any ATI Theatre 650 Pro based card (which one?)? Is there any cards which could deinterlace input analog video before passing it to codec?
WME9 dates back to 2002 so it might be a little picky about choice of capture cards, but I know for sure it will not use MPEG-2 capture cards such as the Hauppauge PVR-250, for example.
Quote:
3) I couldn't find any cmdline based wmv muxer to mux result video track with each of audo track? I cmdline bacause I want to automate my work as much as possible
AsfBin might be able to do it (not sure), or you could write a quick C++ app that uses WM Multiplexer orSolveigMM ASF Multiplexer DShow filters to do it. In fact, who knows, maybe someone already wrote one - I couldn't find one, but that's not to say it's not out there.
zambelli is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:48.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.