InterFrame 2.8.2 - Framedoubling/60FPS/HFR conversion script - Page 21

aegisofrime · 18th April 2012, 11:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by chainik_svp

It's "slow" for 300 FHD frames per second but not for 10.

I see. Good point. Time to shoot a few angry emails at AMD.

chainik_svp · 22nd April 2012, 21:55

aegisofrime

May be you're not alone. Could you look at video memory consumption while encoding?

chainik_svp · 27th April 2012, 17:47

aegisofrime

12.4 really improves OpenCL performance on 5xxx and 6xxx series. What about you?

aegisofrime · 28th April 2012, 04:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by chainik_svp

aegisofrime

12.4 really improves OpenCL performance on 5xxx and 6xxx series. What about you?

Heya thanks for the heads up. Unfortunately, I haven't noticed significantly increase speeds between Catalyst 12.3 and 12.4. Still slower than my old GTX 460 :/

I think I will be looking for a trade when the GTX 660 comes out. :/

Edit: One more thing that has been bugging me.

Why do I get "nvcuvid.dll" and "nvcuda.dll" errors even when I'm running ATI? Clicking ok on the error gets rid of it fine, and my encoding starts without a hitch, but I'm wondering if not having those files on my system could cause issues with my encoding.

SubJunk · 2nd May 2012, 23:40

InterFrame 2.0 is released. This marks the end of support for version 1. Enjoy

kolak · 3rd May 2012, 00:35

What are the improvements?

SubJunk · 3rd May 2012, 00:42

There are no improvements over 2.0 RC1, I just updated the libraries and renamed the files

SubJunk · 4th May 2012, 21:02

2.0.1 is released

mark0077 · 8th May 2012, 18:36

SubJunk, do you know of a way to avoid the flickering effect seen when seeking, when using these frame doubling avisynth scripts.

I see some posts on avsforum here seem to point to it being related to the avisynth dll being used. http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...0#post20171150

Is this flickering, something you think about when selecting an avisynth dll to use in your interframe packs? I'd love to get rid of it to avoid the family going blind when I seek

chainik_svp · 8th May 2012, 21:24

mark0077
I know

The only ultimate solution is to reload script after seek - uncheck "avisynth" checkbox and check it again after 1 second.

kolak · 1st June 2012, 22:49

Having issues with the smoothness

50p to 59.94p conversion on some live shot footage produces jerky scenes. Most of the scenes are absolutely fine, but some (and actually rather slow motion ones) look jerky (specially when watched on TV)- it almost looks like interframe uses original frames instead of interpolated ones. I'm with original mode=0 setting. Some of the problems were related to my adjustment to make scene changes more sensitive- going back to the default settings fixed some scenes, but there are still some bad ones left. Does it mean that interframe thinks that there are scene changes in this pieces of the footage? Should I reduce sensitivity for scene changes? It also looks like problems appears on rather darker scenes (but not very dark). It will go bad after some scene change and than get back to "normal" after another. Most interesting is that these scenes look for me as easy ones. I'm after smooth, interpolated footage, even in price of bit artefacts. Using algo=13, but algo=21 did not really help neither. I have no idea what is causing it

SubJunk · 1st June 2012, 23:00

Hi kolak, please upload a sample so I can test

chainik_svp · 1st June 2012, 23:03

@kolak
may be you could cut off a short sample of a "bad" sequence?
---
@SubJunk

kolak · 1st June 2012, 23:10

I will, but on Wednesday once I'm back to work

It looks strange, maybe some bug, as these scenes do look easy in terms of motion estimation. Done some stress test with very fast footage and there was no problems at all!
I'm bit confused

SubJunk · 4th June 2012, 13:36

InterFrame 2.0.2 is released

By the way, InterFrame is included in Universal Media Server, allowing you to transcode videos from your computer to your renderer (PS3, XBOX, TV, iPad, anything) using InterFrame in realtime. Pretty cool

Reel.Deel · 4th June 2012, 13:45

Thanks Subjunk!

Just wondering, are you ever going to implement a "placebo" preset like V.1 of Interframe?

SubJunk · 4th June 2012, 13:57

Hi Reel.Deel

I decided the old placebo preset wasn't worth it; it was only better quality by a tiiiiiny bit and was many times slower.
Anyway I don't think that method would still work with the SVP DLLs I'm using in version 2

Reel.Deel · 4th June 2012, 14:09

Thanks for the fast responce.

I'm very happy with the quality of "medium", I was just wondering... I have a sample I'll try to upload later today or tomorrow, Is a 1080p test clip shot with a DSLR at 29.97 with a high shutter speed, the interpolated frames look bad. Maybe I can get some advice on how to tune Interframe. Anyways Thanks for all!

chainik_svp · 4th June 2012, 19:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by SubJunk

By the way, InterFrame is included in Universal Media Server

Can't find any word about SVP there

SubJunk · 4th June 2012, 23:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reel.Deel

Thanks for the fast responce.

I'm very happy with the quality of "medium", I was just wondering... I have a sample I'll try to upload later today or tomorrow, Is a 1080p test clip shot with a DSLR at 29.97 with a high shutter speed, the interpolated frames look bad. Maybe I can get some advice on how to tune Interframe. Anyways Thanks for all!

I'll be happy to have a look

Quote:

Originally Posted by chainik_svp

Can't find any word about SVP there

I can find somewhere to add credit for SVP if you want

2nd May 2012, 23:40	#405 \| Link
SubJunk Registered User Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 443	InterFrame 2.0 is released. This marks the end of support for version 1. Enjoy __________________ InterFrame (HFR Conversion Script) :: MPlayer Builds

3rd May 2012, 00:42	#407 \| Link
SubJunk Registered User Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 443	There are no improvements over 2.0 RC1, I just updated the libraries and renamed the files __________________ InterFrame (HFR Conversion Script) :: MPlayer Builds

4th May 2012, 21:02	#408 \| Link
SubJunk Registered User Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 443	2.0.1 is released __________________ InterFrame (HFR Conversion Script) :: MPlayer Builds

1st June 2012, 22:49	#411 \| Link
kolak Registered User Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Poland Posts: 2,843	Having issues with the smoothness 50p to 59.94p conversion on some live shot footage produces jerky scenes. Most of the scenes are absolutely fine, but some (and actually rather slow motion ones) look jerky (specially when watched on TV)- it almost looks like interframe uses original frames instead of interpolated ones. I'm with original mode=0 setting. Some of the problems were related to my adjustment to make scene changes more sensitive- going back to the default settings fixed some scenes, but there are still some bad ones left. Does it mean that interframe thinks that there are scene changes in this pieces of the footage? Should I reduce sensitivity for scene changes? It also looks like problems appears on rather darker scenes (but not very dark). It will go bad after some scene change and than get back to "normal" after another. Most interesting is that these scenes look for me as easy ones. I'm after smooth, interpolated footage, even in price of bit artefacts. Using algo=13, but algo=21 did not really help neither. I have no idea what is causing it Last edited by kolak; 1st June 2012 at 22:53.

1st June 2012, 23:00	#412 \| Link
SubJunk Registered User Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 443	Hi kolak, please upload a sample so I can test __________________ InterFrame (HFR Conversion Script) :: MPlayer Builds

22nd April 2012, 21:55	#402 \| Link
chainik_svp Registered User Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Saint-Petersburg Posts: 239	aegisofrime May be you're not alone. Could you look at video memory consumption while encoding?

27th April 2012, 17:47	#403 \| Link
chainik_svp Registered User Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Saint-Petersburg Posts: 239	aegisofrime 12.4 really improves OpenCL performance on 5xxx and 6xxx series. What about you?

3rd May 2012, 00:35	#406 \| Link
kolak Registered User Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Poland Posts: 2,843	What are the improvements?

8th May 2012, 18:36	#409 \| Link
mark0077 Registered User Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 1,106	SubJunk, do you know of a way to avoid the flickering effect seen when seeking, when using these frame doubling avisynth scripts. I see some posts on avsforum here seem to point to it being related to the avisynth dll being used. http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...0#post20171150 Is this flickering, something you think about when selecting an avisynth dll to use in your interframe packs? I'd love to get rid of it to avoid the family going blind when I seek

8th May 2012, 21:24	#410 \| Link
chainik_svp Registered User Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Saint-Petersburg Posts: 239	mark0077 I know The only ultimate solution is to reload script after seek - uncheck "avisynth" checkbox and check it again after 1 second.

1st June 2012, 23:03	#413 \| Link
chainik_svp Registered User Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Saint-Petersburg Posts: 239	@kolak may be you could cut off a short sample of a "bad" sequence? --- @SubJunk __________________ SVPflow motion interpolation

1st June 2012, 23:10	#414 \| Link
kolak Registered User Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Poland Posts: 2,843	I will, but on Wednesday once I'm back to work It looks strange, maybe some bug, as these scenes do look easy in terms of motion estimation. Done some stress test with very fast footage and there was no problems at all! I'm bit confused

4th June 2012, 13:36	#415 \| Link
SubJunk Registered User Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 443	InterFrame 2.0.2 is released By the way, InterFrame is included in Universal Media Server, allowing you to transcode videos from your computer to your renderer (PS3, XBOX, TV, iPad, anything) using InterFrame in realtime. Pretty cool __________________ InterFrame (HFR Conversion Script) :: MPlayer Builds

4th June 2012, 13:45	#416 \| Link
Reel.Deel Registered User Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Texas Posts: 1,666	Thanks Subjunk! Just wondering, are you ever going to implement a "placebo" preset like V.1 of Interframe?

4th June 2012, 13:57	#417 \| Link
SubJunk Registered User Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 443	Hi Reel.Deel I decided the old placebo preset wasn't worth it; it was only better quality by a tiiiiiny bit and was many times slower. Anyway I don't think that method would still work with the SVP DLLs I'm using in version 2 __________________ InterFrame (HFR Conversion Script) :: MPlayer Builds

4th June 2012, 14:09	#418 \| Link
Reel.Deel Registered User Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Texas Posts: 1,666	Thanks for the fast responce. I'm very happy with the quality of "medium", I was just wondering... I have a sample I'll try to upload later today or tomorrow, Is a 1080p test clip shot with a DSLR at 29.97 with a high shutter speed, the interpolated frames look bad. Maybe I can get some advice on how to tune Interframe. Anyways Thanks for all! Last edited by Reel.Deel; 4th June 2012 at 14:17.