Re-encoding extra Features (that haves 60 Fps video)

DaRarenunikeone · 14th March 2004, 00:11

I love all of the guides on here with CCE.. and all of the batch and do it all for you's but i was wondering.. when i re encode my extra features (that have parts of the video where it looks like 60 fps (watching a tv show).. the frame drops down to the 29.97 i was wondering if i re encoded the extra features without the deinterlace option in the CCE, would they appear like 60 fps in my dvd player (as the original does).. if anyone understanda what iam saying.. please help

D3s7 · 14th March 2004, 02:13

Well.. all NTSC is encoded at 29.97 FPS and PAL is 25FPS.

if you are referring to the combing effect you get when watching interlaced material, then I'm not sure what it you are trying to accomplish??

Trahald · 14th March 2004, 15:39

i THINK what he is referring to the 59.94 FIELDS per second of interlace. Since we deinterlace down to 29.97 it messes up the motion. basically you can keep it interlaced.. but would require manual intervention. Fmalibu might be more insightful than I am about that. Although i have thought about it, since the output can only be truely tested on my TV... i have shyed away from messing with it.. also it is in many opinions harder on the encoder to encode in interlace.

DaRarenunikeone · 14th March 2004, 19:13

Exactly.. that smooth fps when ya see it on tv and it looks like a comb on the pc.. how do you re encode a movie keeping the smooth frame rate.. but compressing it.. is there a script file or anything i can do to make that happen with the compresed size.. thanks for th help in advance

influenza · 15th March 2004, 14:27

If you want to keep the motion smooth yopu have to encode as interlaced I believe. Downside of this is that interlaced material needs a lot of bitrate to look good.

DaRarenunikeone · 16th March 2004, 07:17

I tried to re encode it.. but when i do it cce will show the file being bigger than the expected size and then while the prgress is like 22% the file size gets small again and gets bigger and does the same.. is that a glitch in cce or it suposed to encode like that?

influenza · 16th March 2004, 07:35

hmmm. Well I guess you're talking multiple passes here

So each pass the file starts at 0 and becomes bigger, untill the next pass starts again etc.

14th March 2004, 00:11	#1 \| Link
DaRarenunikeone Registered User Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 6	Re-encoding extra Features (that haves 60 Fps video) I love all of the guides on here with CCE.. and all of the batch and do it all for you's but i was wondering.. when i re encode my extra features (that have parts of the video where it looks like 60 fps (watching a tv show).. the frame drops down to the 29.97 i was wondering if i re encoded the extra features without the deinterlace option in the CCE, would they appear like 60 fps in my dvd player (as the original does).. if anyone understanda what iam saying.. please help

14th March 2004, 02:13	#2 \| Link
D3s7 ScenAid Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 1,623	Well.. all NTSC is encoded at 29.97 FPS and PAL is 25FPS. if you are referring to the combing effect you get when watching interlaced material, then I'm not sure what it you are trying to accomplish?? __________________ ScenAid May just replace the dog as man's best friend http://www.scenaid.com

14th March 2004, 15:39	#3 \| Link
Trahald Wewkiee Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: kashyyyk Posts: 2,269	i THINK what he is referring to the 59.94 FIELDS per second of interlace. Since we deinterlace down to 29.97 it messes up the motion. basically you can keep it interlaced.. but would require manual intervention. Fmalibu might be more insightful than I am about that. Although i have thought about it, since the output can only be truely tested on my TV... i have shyed away from messing with it.. also it is in many opinions harder on the encoder to encode in interlace. __________________ ...yeah...but...why on earth would I compare apples with apples?

15th March 2004, 14:27	#5 \| Link
influenza Dutch strain Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Netherlands Posts: 2,039	If you want to keep the motion smooth yopu have to encode as interlaced I believe. Downside of this is that interlaced material needs a lot of bitrate to look good. __________________ What can I do to protect myself against the flu? By far, the single best way to prevent the flu is for individuals, especially persons at high risk for serious complications from the flu, to get a flu shot each fall.

16th March 2004, 07:17	#6 \| Link
DaRarenunikeone Registered User Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 6	cool I tried to re encode it.. but when i do it cce will show the file being bigger than the expected size and then while the prgress is like 22% the file size gets small again and gets bigger and does the same.. is that a glitch in cce or it suposed to encode like that?

14th March 2004, 19:13	#4 \| Link
DaRarenunikeone Registered User Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 6	Exactly.. that smooth fps when ya see it on tv and it looks like a comb on the pc.. how do you re encode a movie keeping the smooth frame rate.. but compressing it.. is there a script file or anything i can do to make that happen with the compresed size.. thanks for th help in advance

16th March 2004, 07:35	#7 \| Link
influenza Dutch strain Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Netherlands Posts: 2,039	hmmm. Well I guess you're talking multiple passes here So each pass the file starts at 0 and becomes bigger, untill the next pass starts again etc. __________________ What can I do to protect myself against the flu? By far, the single best way to prevent the flu is for individuals, especially persons at high risk for serious complications from the flu, to get a flu shot each fall.