Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
3rd September 2013, 22:28 | #42 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 173
|
Physic is my new nickname last several years (I know and like science e.t.c). My real name is Roman actually. And I forget email and password at this forum.
I got Blu-ray specs several hours ago. So, I am going to start with 3D bluray on output (and 3D subtiels as well). It is going to take several days. So, you can add feature requests, I'll arrange it. But I'll start a little bit latter with bugs and features. Current target - 3D. |
3rd September 2013, 22:36 | #43 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 230
|
Quote:
|
|
3rd September 2013, 22:38 | #44 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 173
|
tsMuxeR is started as my own project. But then I shared rights with SmartLabs (all source code is written by me in anyway). Smartlabs and I both have full rights to tsMuxeR source.
Network Optix - startup company where I working now. I want to improve Network Optix brand awareness. |
3rd September 2013, 22:39 | #45 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,059
|
physic, to create ssif I think you will need add option which restrict output to iso. On a side note I own mvc encoder if you need help or think I can help let me know.
Last edited by HWK; 3rd September 2013 at 22:50. Reason: remove unwanted data |
3rd September 2013, 22:49 | #47 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 173
|
By the way: if anybody have a couple of fast SSD drives: please check tsMuxeR processing speed in some general scenario (M2TS remuxin for example), I meain source and target files should be on a different SSD drive to improve speed.
- Is version 1.11.x have better speed than 1.10.x? - How big processing speed in Mb/sec? |
3rd September 2013, 23:18 | #51 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 48
|
Quote:
SSD #1 : OCZ Vector 512 GB - Sequential Read: 550 MB/s; Sequential Write: 530 MB/s 4k Random Write: 100K IOPS; 4k Random Read: 95K IOPS SSD #2 OCZ Vertex 3 128 GB Max Read: up to 550MB/s, Max Write: up to 500 MB/s, 4KB Random Write: I/O Per Second (IOPS): 60,000 IOPS, Seek time: 0.1 ms, Controller: SandForce 2281 SSD #3 OCZ Vertex 3 128 GB I will do test and will put results here |
|
4th September 2013, 01:20 | #52 | Link |
QB the Slayer
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 697
|
Demux from 4x500GB Caviar Black RAID0 to 2x60GB Mushkin Chronos RAID0 (via mounted ISO located on a 300GB short stroke):
Remux (to Bluray) from above files on 2x60GB Mushkin Chronos RAID0 to 4x500GB Caviar Black RAID0 (300GB short stroke): I also checked CPU usage and it was working with nice multi-threading (I have an FX-8350) Hope this info helps edit: I just did a windows cut and paste of the demuxed files and it only transfered at an average of 299 MB/s (doing the math of the bluray remux, tsMuxeR did it at 322 MB/s)... your SW is more efficient than Win 7 x64 explorer! QB ps... I have been in love with your SW for a very long time... glad to see development is back underway!
__________________
Last edited by QBhd; 4th September 2013 at 03:13. Reason: More info... |
4th September 2013, 01:43 | #53 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 48
|
Quote:
Source: OCZ Vector 512 GB (non-raid) Destination: OCZ Vertex 3 128 GB (non-raid) File Size: 34,3 GB Type: .m2ts TsMuxeR 1.10.6 Disk Usage: TsMuxeR 1.11.6(b) Disk Usage: CPU Usage (Intel i7-3970x): This is my results, hope will help you. Last edited by jediknight; 4th September 2013 at 01:46. |
|
4th September 2013, 03:30 | #54 | Link |
QB the Slayer
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 697
|
Update:
I forgot to do a comparison to Version 1.10.6... so I ran the exact same file as above in the exact same way with Version 1.10.6... here are the results: Demuxing time: 3 min 2 sec Muxing time: 1 min 30 sec Also the original .m2ts from the BluRay ISO was 22.7 GB (24,381,474,816 bytes). So as you can see 1.11.6(b) is substantially faster and more multi-threaded as well... the demux is 22.5% faster and the remux is 20% faster EDIT: Ran the 1.11.6(b) test again but from the SSD's to the HDD's on the demux and here is that result: Demuxing time: 1 min 17 sec Seems that I am limited by the speed of the 4x500GB Caviar Blacks... I took a screenie of CPU usage for this one: QB
__________________
Last edited by QBhd; 4th September 2013 at 03:47. |
4th September 2013, 10:35 | #55 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 7,277
|
just saw this thread and didn't have time to do any testing,..
Here's a list of a bunch of bugs that the old version had and which should be fixed:
|
4th September 2013, 13:28 | #56 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 173
|
QBhd
Thank you! So, version 1.11 is faster as I expected, but still limited by CPU in muxing operation. I think after correct optimization speed about 500 Mb/sec can be achieved in scenario with 2 SSD (as fast as simple file copy). But so high speed required a lot to work to do. It is not high priority task in my list. |
4th September 2013, 13:50 | #57 | Link |
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 5,034
|
Not to take away from Roman's efforts but this is hardly a benchmark.
Windows Explorer is a bloated piece of garbage (increasingly so as Windows versions advance) with idiotic animated progress dialogs that eat 100 times more CPU cycles than the copying process it is supposed to perform.
__________________
Groucho's Avisynth Stuff |
4th September 2013, 17:11 | #58 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,059
|
I conducted some test as well and from what I can conclude there is certainly decrease in time to create output for blu-ray, avchd or m2ts.
Decrease in time 11.1% to build file in new version. I want to also mention all test took place in ram as such I couldn't show screenshot of resource monitor, since it didn't appear in there. Source: Ice Age: A mammoth Christmas special (Run time 25 min) Processor usage was at 1% and clock at 4.00GHZ (Intel i7-3930K) Last edited by HWK; 4th September 2013 at 20:19. Reason: remove images |
4th September 2013, 18:27 | #59 | Link |
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Spain
Posts: 6,915
|
@HWK
Thanks for your job testing old and new tsMuxeR versions. BTW, I don't want attach 10 big (1918x877) jpg files (1795.7 KB) only to show this info: Code:
Muxing time 1.10.6 1.11.6 ------------ ------ ------ AVCHD 9 sec 8 sec Blu-ray disk 9 sec 8 sec Demux 12 sec 12 sec M2TSMuxing 9 sec 8 sec TSMuxing 8 sec 8 sec
__________________
BeHappy, AviSynth audio transcoder. Last edited by tebasuna51; 4th September 2013 at 18:34. |
4th September 2013, 20:01 | #60 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,059
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|