Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion.

Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules.

 

Go Back   Doom9's Forum > Video Encoding > MPEG-4 ASP

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 9th June 2011, 14:49   #21  |  Link
SeeMoreDigital
Life's clearer in 4K UHD
 
SeeMoreDigital's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 12,227
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrVideo View Post
OK. According to one of the people involved, DivX videos have been encoded with a vertical height of 404, which is not mod16. How can that be?
Unfortunately alot of encoding applications allow people to generate MPEG-4 SP/ASP encodes at "any old" mod value
__________________
| I've been testing hardware media playback devices and software A/V encoders and decoders since 2001 | My Network Layout & A/V Gear |
SeeMoreDigital is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th June 2011, 02:35   #22  |  Link
MrVideo
Registered User
 
MrVideo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeeMoreDigital View Post
According to your PM one of your guys has an Toshiba SC-4000 which is fitted with an Zoran Vaddis 966 chipset. Which should offer .MP4 container support too
The Toshiba SD-4000KU2 appears to display anamorphic video correctly on the screen (letterboxed), but the MP3 audio plays out-of-sync and slightly distorted. But, I'm thinking it is because the video is 59.94 fps, as the source is 720p59.94.

I'm having him check out a video, 720x400 square pixel, that is 23.976 fps.
MrVideo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2011, 08:24   #23  |  Link
MrVideo
Registered User
 
MrVideo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrVideo View Post
I'm having him check out a video, 720x400 square pixel, that is 23.976 fps.
The video played just fine, including the audio. Next up is a test for anamorphic widescreen 720x480. Also, the XviD encoder was used.
MrVideo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2011, 09:47   #24  |  Link
kalehrl
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 331
Why don't you just change the encoding parameters to suit "normal" dvd/xvid player instead of choosing a player which plays files encoded with some "strange" settings?
Maybe I'm missing something here.
kalehrl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2011, 10:08   #25  |  Link
SeeMoreDigital
Life's clearer in 4K UHD
 
SeeMoreDigital's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 12,227
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrVideo View Post
The video played just fine, including the audio. Next up is a test for anamorphic widescreen 720x480. Also, the XviD encoder was used.
Well, if the 720x480 16:9 and 4:3 anamorphic samples I gave you did not work with the Toshiba. No MPEG-4 SP/ASP .AVI contained encode will...
__________________
| I've been testing hardware media playback devices and software A/V encoders and decoders since 2001 | My Network Layout & A/V Gear |
SeeMoreDigital is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2011, 07:25   #26  |  Link
MrVideo
Registered User
 
MrVideo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeeMoreDigital View Post
Well, if the 720x480 16:9 and 4:3 anamorphic samples I gave you did not work with the Toshiba. No MPEG-4 SP/ASP .AVI contained encode will...
I have not heard a response from him about the test files. Don't know why. I will get him to play those.

720x480 anamorphic 16:9 does not play letterboxed. It plays as if the video was 4:3, i.e., does nothing but send it out the composite video.

A 720x400 square pixel encoding plays fine.
MrVideo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2011, 07:32   #27  |  Link
MrVideo
Registered User
 
MrVideo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by kalehrl View Post
Why don't you just change the encoding parameters to suit "normal" dvd/xvid player instead of choosing a player which plays files encoded with some "strange" settings?
Maybe I'm missing something here.
Who said the settings are strange. IMHO, the DivX certification is a mess. The fact that it won't play a 720x480 anamorphic 16:9 video correctly is fubar. DVDs have been that way for ages and yet, something "new" takes steps backwards.

And just what is normal? It is easy to find specs on encoding for DVDs, but pretty much impossible for DivX. And what settings might those be? The program, HDConvertToX, has lots of settings, including anamorphic.
MrVideo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2011, 08:03   #28  |  Link
kalehrl
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 331
If anamorphic is causing problems, don't use it.
It advisable to use square pixels when encoding in xvid and I think the same goes for divx.
I've been doing backups of my DVDs and satellite dvb-s recordings with AutoGK and sometimes with MeGUI and never have I had any troubles with playback on a standalone device - Philips dvp3260.
AutoGK always uses square pixels but MeGUI has also anamorphic function but, for standalone compatibility, it is not recommended when encoding in xvid.

Last edited by kalehrl; 15th June 2011 at 20:15.
kalehrl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2011, 16:43   #29  |  Link
manolito
Registered User
 
manolito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 3,079
@MrVideo

Quote:
The fact that it won't play a 720x480 anamorphic 16:9 video correctly is fubar. DVDs have been that way for ages and yet, something "new" takes steps backwards.
You really have to take into account why the DivX company created this "Home Theater" profile in the past. They had to use the least common denominator to ensure compatibility with each and every standalone which had the DivX logo slapped on the front panel. To achieve this they gladly sacrificed a lot of possible options and features which the encoder offered.

To the best of my knowledge standalone players can either have the core "DivX" logo or the "DivX Ultra" logo. DivX Ultra supports anamorphic, menus, chapters and subtitles. But you can only author such a file using their own "DivXAuthor" software or TMPGenc Authoring Works.

For full compatibility with all DivX capable standalones I recommend to use the settings which their own "DivX Converter" uses. Those are:

1. Use the "Home Theater" profile

2. Square Pixels. Do not encode anamorphic.

3. Always deinterlace the source.

4. 2-pass ABR encoding. Do not use quality based encoding.

5. Audio should be MP3 CBR. Do not use VBR.
(AC3 is also allowed, but some standalones do not like it)


Cheers
manolito

Last edited by manolito; 15th June 2011 at 20:18.
manolito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2011, 18:14   #30  |  Link
SeeMoreDigital
Life's clearer in 4K UHD
 
SeeMoreDigital's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 12,227
MPEG-4 SP/ASP hardware player history lesson...

Given that DivX developed their first player "Certification" long before "aspect ratio signalling" (ARS) detection was conceived, there was no requirement for player manufacturers to include support for it.

Indeed, SigmaDesigns A/V decoding chip-sets included ARS detection support for MPEG-4 SP/ASP streams placed within the .MP4 container, a year or so before adding support for MPEG-4 SP/ASP streams placed the .AVI container!

Hardware player manufacturers who sold players based around MediaTek's MT1389xx A/V decoding chip-set(s) offered better ARS support for .AVI contained files than any other A/V decoding chip-set manufacturer.

Although, many A/V decoding "chip-set" manufacturers developed chip-sets that supported ARS detection for MPEG-4 SP/ASP streams placed within the .AVI container, not all "player" manufacturers could be bothered to enable it. And there's no-way they ever will now!

Xvid, offered the ability to generate MPEG-4 SP/ASP streams with ARS "years" before DivX.

Xvid also created a direct-show decoder filter capable of decoding MPEG-4 SP/ASP streams with ARS "years" before DivX.


Cheers
__________________
| I've been testing hardware media playback devices and software A/V encoders and decoders since 2001 | My Network Layout & A/V Gear |
SeeMoreDigital is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2011, 20:56   #31  |  Link
MrVideo
Registered User
 
MrVideo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by kalehrl View Post
If anamorphic is causing problems, don't use it.
Because it doesn't work, I'm not.
MrVideo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2011, 21:07   #32  |  Link
MrVideo
Registered User
 
MrVideo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by manolito View Post
For full compatibility with all DivX capable standalones I recommend to use the settings which their own "DivX Converter" uses. Those are:

1. Use the "Home Theater" profile
HDConvertToX doesn't have such an option, at least not that I've found. They have a "Stand Alone Player" compatibility mode, which I use. I also use the XviD encoder, as I seem to not have DivX installed. Fine by me.

Quote:
2. Square Pixels. Do not encode anamorphic.
Ya, doing that now (720x400 for 16:9 material).

Quote:
3. Always deinterlace the source.
That doesn't make sense for pure video material, as it has to be interlaced when sent out the composite video outputs. A moot point in a majority of the cases anyway, as the source is 720p23.976 H.264 MKV.

Quote:
4. 2-pass ABR encoding. Do not use quality based encoding.
1300 kbps is the manual bitrate that I use.

Quote:
5. Audio should be MP3 CBR. Do not use VBR.
192 kbps MP3 CBR
MrVideo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th June 2011, 21:09   #33  |  Link
MrVideo
Registered User
 
MrVideo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeeMoreDigital View Post
MPEG-4 SP/ASP hardware player history lesson...
I appreciate the info. Thanks.
MrVideo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2011, 14:40   #34  |  Link
Jawor
Ex-ter-mi-nate!
 
Jawor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: www.videoaudio.pl
Posts: 218
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrVideo View Post
That doesn't make sense for pure video material, as it has to be interlaced when sent out the composite video outputs.
The “DivX Home Theater” profile supports interlacing, but...

1. It does not allow B-VOPs together with interlacing.
2. To retain the interlacing we'd have to keep the vertical resolution (576/480). Since the maximum horizontal resolution for “PAL” material is 720, we'll have a distorted AR with such clips (due to lack of widespread support for anamorphic signaling). Sure, we can create interlaced clips using other resolutions (by smart-bobbing before resizing and re-interlacing the clip after resizing), but does that really make sense?
3. Some players seem to have issues with interlaced MPEG-4 despite being DivX-certified. E.g. my Philips DVP3142/12 (also based on the Zoran Vaddis 966 chipset) doesn't like TFF with 720x576 @ 25 FPS, but with 720x480 @ 29.97 FPS it works just fine.
__________________
Please excuse if my English is crappy.

Archive of my Xvid builds

http://www.videoaudio.pl

Last edited by Jawor; 7th July 2011 at 13:16.
Jawor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th June 2011, 16:44   #35  |  Link
SeeMoreDigital
Life's clearer in 4K UHD
 
SeeMoreDigital's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 12,227
Personally speaking...

Given the relative low cost of todays "high-def" capable network media players along with their ability to play just about any "popular" audio, video and container format. I'm of the opinion it's not worth the effort trying to find specific encoding options to accommodate these "low spec/weak" players!
__________________
| I've been testing hardware media playback devices and software A/V encoders and decoders since 2001 | My Network Layout & A/V Gear |

Last edited by SeeMoreDigital; 13th July 2011 at 09:22.
SeeMoreDigital is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2011, 10:15   #36  |  Link
MrVideo
Registered User
 
MrVideo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,132
As a result of all this, only 23.976 progressive material will be converted.
MrVideo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2011, 15:58   #37  |  Link
kurkosdr
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 313
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrVideo View Post
I also believe that the issue is with SUPER, but have no proof one way or the other.
Divx avi clips made with SUPER don't play in my player too (toshiba 19DV615DG). When I select the clip, the screen goes black, as if it's about to start playing, but nothing happens. So, just use some other program to make Divx avi files.

The converter I use is Divx Plus Converter (yes, the one from Divx Inc). The real problem with other converters is that they are not really Divx-compatible. If you encode using high quality settings (like me), they are almost certainly going to produce a bitrate spike that exceeds 4096Kbps for more than one second, thus causing some players to freeze or skip.

Even AutoGK, which has compatibility profiles for the ESS and MTK chipsets, if you select "100%" in the "target quality" setting, it tells you that "some compatibility parameterers are going to be ignored".

Of course, if you encode using low bitrates (quantizer 4 or just fitting a 2hour movie in 1CD/2CD), then this problem doesn't show itself, so you may also use AutoGK.
kurkosdr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2011, 16:18   #38  |  Link
Ghitulescu
Registered User
 
Ghitulescu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 5,769
Quote:
Originally Posted by kurkosdr View Post
The converter I use is Divx Plus Converter (yes, the one from Divx Inc). The real problem with other converters is that they are not really Divx-compatible. If you encode using high quality settings (like me), they are almost certainly going to produce a bitrate spike that exceeds 4096Kbps for more than one second, thus causing some players to freeze or skip.
Since DivX Networks (now DivX inc) licences the divx use, format and logo for standalones, it's no wonder their encodes work the best on them.
__________________
Born in the USB (not USA)
Ghitulescu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2011, 16:31   #39  |  Link
Jawor
Ex-ter-mi-nate!
 
Jawor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: www.videoaudio.pl
Posts: 218
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghitulescu View Post
DivX Networks (now DivX inc)
Now a part of Macrovision

Quote:
The real problem with other converters is that they are not really Divx-compatible. If you encode using high quality settings (like me), they are almost certainly going to produce a bitrate spike that exceeds 4096Kbps for more than one second, thus causing some players to freeze or skip.
Using VBV in Xvid (which, BTW, is enabled by default in its VfW interface for two-pass encodes ) should help here. Actually, Xvid.org's own Xvid Home profile uses the same VBV values that are specified in DivX Home Theater (so do celtic_druid's MTK PAL / MTK NTSC profiles and my Generic Standalone profile).
__________________
Please excuse if my English is crappy.

Archive of my Xvid builds

http://www.videoaudio.pl
Jawor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2011, 16:42   #40  |  Link
Ghitulescu
Registered User
 
Ghitulescu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 5,769
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jawor View Post
Now a part of Macrovision
I thought part of Sonic Solutions. Good to know.
__________________
Born in the USB (not USA)
Ghitulescu is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:31.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.