soft bicubic better than Bilinear? - Page 2

Narions · 24th January 2002, 09:30

Skyout, im refering to a film camera (dvd).
By the way, im Spanish and my main problem is that many times i cannot express what im thinking (for example my last post about a camera and first planes (i think my words can be interpreted in other sense and i will be not understandable...)

bb · 24th January 2002, 10:46

If you ask me: To get a good picture with a DV camcorder you'll need to use filters most of the time. To get rid of the noise, you might want to use smart smoother, dynamic noise reduction, or chroma noise reduction, some temporal smoothing, etc.

Because the filtering usually decreases crispness, you should better use Precise Bicubic (0.75) which sharpens a little.

bb

24th January 2002, 16:03

Quote:

Originally posted by skyout Christian - Ummm, doesn't quite make sense, does it? What does a power supply to a camcorder have to do with the firewire connection?

It does make sense to those with a background in electronics ..... simply a 50 Hz mains noise on the firewire ( common ground ) .... and your interface I/O chip gets crazy....

24th January 2002, 09:30	#21 \| Link
Narions Registered User Join Date: Nov 2001 Posts: 4	Skyout, im refering to a film camera (dvd). By the way, im Spanish and my main problem is that many times i cannot express what im thinking (for example my last post about a camera and first planes (i think my words can be interpreted in other sense and i will be not understandable...)

24th January 2002, 10:46	#22 \| Link
bb Moderator Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Germany Posts: 2,665	If you ask me: To get a good picture with a DV camcorder you'll need to use filters most of the time. To get rid of the noise, you might want to use smart smoother, dynamic noise reduction, or chroma noise reduction, some temporal smoothing, etc. Because the filtering usually decreases crispness, you should better use Precise Bicubic (0.75) which sharpens a little. bb