Welcome to Doom9's Forum, THE in-place to be for everyone interested in DVD conversion. Before you start posting please read the forum rules. By posting to this forum you agree to abide by the rules. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
30th October 2011, 10:19 | #10201 | Link |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,806
|
because it does not make sense. for instenance have you ever seen stereo ac3 encoded at 384,448,640 kbps. higher bitrate is only useful for streams with more channels.
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper |
30th October 2011, 11:00 | #10203 | Link |
RipBot264 author
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Poland
Posts: 7,806
|
why? because you like placebo effect? aac 128kps gives better quality than mp3 192kbps.
__________________
Windows 7 Image Updater - SkyLake\KabyLake\CoffeLake\Ryzen Threadripper |
30th October 2011, 11:22 | #10204 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Arabian Peninsula
Posts: 10
|
More freedom of choice for the bit rate from 32 to 320kbps is so much better than to be limited to only 3 choices (64,96,128 ) for all your videos encoding even if aac 128kps gives better quality than mp3 192kbps.
|
30th October 2011, 16:19 | #10206 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 121
|
Quote:
I'm guessing it's to keep ripbot as simple as possible. Less things to go wrong. But you can use mkvmerge, which is included in the ripbot package, to add multiple tracks and it takes just a few seconds. |
|
30th October 2011, 16:22 | #10207 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 121
|
Quote:
If you need 320k MP3's, maybe Ripbot might not be right for you. If you are a 64k MP3 Pro person, this is the game for you. Ultimately, you can manually go in to the jobs queue and change the number to whatever you want. Just open up the .bat file and go at it. |
|
30th October 2011, 16:32 | #10208 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 121
|
Quote:
Anyway, if you use CQ mode with NO filters, you get 100%. If you touch it in anyway, you get 30%. That tells me it's not a System issue, but a program issue. It seems that the x264 encoder doesn't like to use external filters or settings. |
|
30th October 2011, 19:28 | #10210 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 39
|
Quote:
i said i want quality, but if quality drops, then it doesnt matter. you took that to mean i dont care if quality drops. what i meant was if it affects quality it doesnt matter il just leave it as it is |
|
31st October 2011, 08:27 | #10212 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Arabian Peninsula
Posts: 10
|
i hope that i expressed my thought well
all what i wanted is the whole list of the 2 channels audio bit rates from 32 to 320kbps and not to be limited only to (64,96,128) even if no one going to use 320kbps i hope i find it in the next release |
31st October 2011, 16:25 | #10214 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 174
|
Quote:
Seriously, if you can do some ABX tests and show that you really need more than 128K on two channel content, that might convince Atak to add more, but until that time it's not gonna happen. Check out the tests of music (much more difficult than effects in movies) at hydrogenaudio.org and tell me you need more than 128K. Maybe, just maybe adding 160 to placate those wanting more, but it's not necessary. |
|
1st November 2011, 05:46 | #10215 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 121
|
Random Rant
I just have say I love this program. I have some STE WEB-DL's that are 1.5gb and I'm reEcoding them and they are coming out at 500-550mb and check this out, THEY ARE BETTER QUALITY THAN THE ORIGINALs.
Seriously. With a little tweaking of the colors, contrast, and the denoising, they look better at 1/3rd the size. Oh, and I'm correcting the FPS which was at a sqeaky 25fps to 23.976FPS. ALL with Ripbot. |
1st November 2011, 08:19 | #10216 | Link |
German doom9/Gleitz SuMo
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Germany, rural Altmark
Posts: 6,753
|
@ Zorro70:
Always unterstand that the encoder can only encode as fast as it receives the uncompressed video it shall process. What exactly is your source? (MediaInfo analysis please.) Which decoder do you use to decode it for x264, if it is compressed? If the source is compressed, the bottleneck might be the decoder running in one thread only, or the filtering, before the final video arrives in the encoder. If the source is completely uncompressed, the bottleneck might be the harddisk, but you will know how many GB per minute you stored. __ It may look better, but can't be better. That is the difference between "subjective quality" (how annoying the flaws appear) and "objective quality" (any difference is a loss, no matter if it looks more convenient). Last edited by LigH; 1st November 2011 at 08:22. |
1st November 2011, 14:59 | #10217 | Link |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 121
|
While I understand what you are trying to say about something being recompressed being better, "It may look better, but can't be better." since this is video and it's subjective quality is visual, if it looks better than it is better.
|
1st November 2011, 15:04 | #10218 | Link | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 121
|
Quote:
Also at least for me, I'm using the 32bit version. This might different for 64bit. There is a new version of x264.exe that was released last week. You could try it. Didn't seem to do much for me. CPU usage has increased from a bit more with No increase or real change in FPS. Last edited by rc71; 1st November 2011 at 15:20. Reason: New info |
|
1st November 2011, 15:42 | #10219 | Link |
German doom9/Gleitz SuMo
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Germany, rural Altmark
Posts: 6,753
|
1) If you believe it looks much better, enjoy. But don't try to measure anything with "quality metrics" – they will call any kind of difference a "quality loss".
2) x264 will probably be the most efficient link in the encoding chain, spreading its efforts across all available CPU cores. If it can't use all of them all the time, then it must have to wait for something else before... |
Tags |
264, 265, appletv, avchd, bluray, gui, iphone, ipod, ps3, psp, ripbot264, x264 2-pass, x264 gui, x264_64, x265, xbox360 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|